Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMohler, James L.
dc.contributor.authorHalabi, Susan
dc.contributor.authorRyan, Stephen T.
dc.contributor.authorAl-Daghmin, Ali
dc.contributor.authorSokoloff, Mitchell H.
dc.contributor.authorSteinberg, Gary D.
dc.contributor.authorSanford, Ben L.
dc.contributor.authorEastham, James A.
dc.contributor.authorWalther, Philip J.
dc.contributor.authorMorris, Michael J.
dc.contributor.authorSmall, Eric J.
dc.date2022-08-11T08:09:53.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T16:47:24Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T16:47:24Z
dc.date.issued2019-05-01
dc.date.submitted2019-07-08
dc.identifier.citation<p>Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2019 May;22(2):309-316. doi: 10.1038/s41391-018-0106-1. Epub 2018 Nov 1. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41391-018-0106-1">Link to article on publisher's site</a></p>
dc.identifier.issn1365-7852 (Linking)
dc.identifier.doi10.1038/s41391-018-0106-1
dc.identifier.pmid30385835
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/41071
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: To evaluate efficacy and morbidity prospectively in a contemporary multi-institutional salvage radical prostatectomy (SRP) series. METHODS: Forty-one men were enrolled between 1997 and 2006, who suffered biopsy-proven recurrent prostate cancer (CaP) after receiving > /= 60c Gy radiation as primary treatment for cT1-2NXM0 disease. Surgical morbidity, quality of life, biochemical progression-free survival (BPFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated. RESULTS: Twenty-four men had undergone external beam radiotherapy, 11 brachytherapy, and six both. Median time between radiation and SRP was 64 months. Median age at SRP was 64 years. Pathologic staging revealed 44% pT2, 54% pT3, and 3% pT4. Surgical margins were positive in 17 and 88% were pN0. Twenty-two percent required intraoperative blood transfusion. Three rectal and one obturator nerve injuries occurred. Seventeen of 38 evaluable patients (45%) had urinary incontinence ( > /= 3 pads/day) prior to SRP; 88% reported urinary incontinence at 6 months, 85% at 12 months, 63% at 24 months after SRP. Furthermore, 37% of men reported impotence prior to SRP; 78% reported impotence at 6 months, 82% at 12 months, and 44% at 24 months after SRP. The 2-, 5- and 10-year BPFS rates were 51, 39, and 33% respectively; the 2-, 5- and 10-year OS rates were 100, 89, and 52%, respectively, at median follow-up 91 months. CONCLUSIONS: Modern surgical techniques continue to be associated with significant peri-operative complication rates. Nevertheless, SRP may benefit carefully selected patients through durable oncologic control.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<p><a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=30385835&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a></p>
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6494708/
dc.subjectMale Urogenital Diseases
dc.subjectNeoplasms
dc.subjectOncology
dc.subjectSurgery
dc.subjectSurgical Procedures, Operative
dc.subjectTherapeutics
dc.titleManagement of recurrent prostate cancer after radiotherapy: long-term results from CALGB 9687 (Alliance), a prospective multi-institutional salvage prostatectomy series
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleProstate cancer and prostatic diseases
dc.source.volume22
dc.source.issue2
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/oapubs/3862
dc.identifier.contextkey14880266
html.description.abstract<p>BACKGROUND: To evaluate efficacy and morbidity prospectively in a contemporary multi-institutional salvage radical prostatectomy (SRP) series.</p> <p>METHODS: Forty-one men were enrolled between 1997 and 2006, who suffered biopsy-proven recurrent prostate cancer (CaP) after receiving > /= 60c Gy radiation as primary treatment for cT1-2NXM0 disease. Surgical morbidity, quality of life, biochemical progression-free survival (BPFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated.</p> <p>RESULTS: Twenty-four men had undergone external beam radiotherapy, 11 brachytherapy, and six both. Median time between radiation and SRP was 64 months. Median age at SRP was 64 years. Pathologic staging revealed 44% pT2, 54% pT3, and 3% pT4. Surgical margins were positive in 17 and 88% were pN0. Twenty-two percent required intraoperative blood transfusion. Three rectal and one obturator nerve injuries occurred. Seventeen of 38 evaluable patients (45%) had urinary incontinence ( > /= 3 pads/day) prior to SRP; 88% reported urinary incontinence at 6 months, 85% at 12 months, 63% at 24 months after SRP. Furthermore, 37% of men reported impotence prior to SRP; 78% reported impotence at 6 months, 82% at 12 months, and 44% at 24 months after SRP. The 2-, 5- and 10-year BPFS rates were 51, 39, and 33% respectively; the 2-, 5- and 10-year OS rates were 100, 89, and 52%, respectively, at median follow-up 91 months.</p> <p>CONCLUSIONS: Modern surgical techniques continue to be associated with significant peri-operative complication rates. Nevertheless, SRP may benefit carefully selected patients through durable oncologic control.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathoapubs/3862
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Urology
dc.source.pages309-316


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record