Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSchoenfeld, Elizabeth M.
dc.contributor.authorShieh, Meng-Shiou
dc.contributor.authorPekow, Penelope S.
dc.contributor.authorScales, Charles D. Jr.
dc.contributor.authorMunger, James M.
dc.contributor.authorLindenauer, Peter K.
dc.date2022-08-11T08:09:55.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T16:48:39Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T16:48:39Z
dc.date.issued2019-12-02
dc.date.submitted2020-01-13
dc.identifier.citation<p>JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Dec 2;2(12):e1916454. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.16454. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.16454">Link to article on publisher's site</a></p>
dc.identifier.issn2574-3805 (Linking)
dc.identifier.doi10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.16454
dc.identifier.pmid31790565
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/41311
dc.description.abstractImportance: Little is known about the timing of urologic interventions in patients with renal colic discharged from the emergency department. Understanding patients' likelihood of a subsequent urologic intervention could inform decision-making in this population. Objectives: To examine the rate and timing of urologic procedures performed after an emergency department visit for renal colic and the factors associated with receipt of an intervention. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study used the Massachusetts All Payers Claims Database to identify patients 18 to 64 years of age who were seen in a Massachusetts emergency department for renal colic from January 1, 2011, to October 31, 2014, Patients were identified via International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes, and all medical care was linked, enabling identification of subsequent health care use. Data analysis was performed from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2018. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was receipt of urologic procedure within 60 days. Secondary outcomes included rates of return emergency department visit and urologic and primary care follow-up. Results: A total of 66218 unique index visits by 55314 patients (mean [SD] age, 42.6 [12.4] years; 33 590 [50.7%] female; 25 411 [38.4%] Medicaid insured) were included in the study. A total of 5851 patients (8.8%) had visits resulting in admission at the index encounter, and 1774 (2.7%) had visits resulting in a urologic procedure during that admission. Of the 60367 patient visits resulting in discharge from the emergency department, 3018 (5.0%) led to a urologic procedure within 7 days, 4407 (7.3%) within 14 days, 5916 (9.8%) within 28 days, and 7667 (12.7%) within 60 days. A total of 3226 visits (5.3%) led to a subsequent emergency department visit within 7 days and 6792 (11.3%) within 60 days. For the entire cohort (admitted and discharged patients), 39 189 (59.2%) had contact with a urologist or primary care practitioner within 60 days. Having Medicaid-only insurance was associated with lower rates of urologic procedures (odds ratio, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.66-0.74) and urologic follow-up (5.6% vs 8.8%; P < .001) and higher rates of primary care follow-up (59.2% vs 47.2%; P < .001) compared with patients with all other insurance types. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, most adult patients younger than 65 years who were discharged from the emergency department with a diagnosis of renal colic did not undergo a procedure or see a urologist within 60 days. This finding has implications for both the emergency department and outpatient treatment of these patients.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<p><a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=31790565&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a></p>
dc.rightsCopyright 2019 Schoenfeld EM et al. JAMA Network Open. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectemergency department
dc.subjectrenal colic
dc.subjecturologic procedures
dc.subjectEmergency Medicine
dc.subjectFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications
dc.subjectHealth Services Administration
dc.subjectHealth Services Research
dc.subjectMale Urogenital Diseases
dc.subjectUrology
dc.titleAssociation of Patient and Visit Characteristics With Rate and Timing of Urologic Procedures for Patients Discharged From the Emergency Department With Renal Colic
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleJAMA network open
dc.source.volume2
dc.source.issue12
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5116&amp;context=oapubs&amp;unstamped=1
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/oapubs/4097
dc.identifier.contextkey16192408
refterms.dateFOA2022-08-23T16:48:40Z
html.description.abstract<p>Importance: Little is known about the timing of urologic interventions in patients with renal colic discharged from the emergency department. Understanding patients' likelihood of a subsequent urologic intervention could inform decision-making in this population.</p> <p>Objectives: To examine the rate and timing of urologic procedures performed after an emergency department visit for renal colic and the factors associated with receipt of an intervention.</p> <p>Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study used the Massachusetts All Payers Claims Database to identify patients 18 to 64 years of age who were seen in a Massachusetts emergency department for renal colic from January 1, 2011, to October 31, 2014, Patients were identified via International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes, and all medical care was linked, enabling identification of subsequent health care use. Data analysis was performed from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2018. Main Outcomes and</p> <p>Measures: The main outcome was receipt of urologic procedure within 60 days. Secondary outcomes included rates of return emergency department visit and urologic and primary care follow-up.</p> <p>Results: A total of 66218 unique index visits by 55314 patients (mean [SD] age, 42.6 [12.4] years; 33 590 [50.7%] female; 25 411 [38.4%] Medicaid insured) were included in the study. A total of 5851 patients (8.8%) had visits resulting in admission at the index encounter, and 1774 (2.7%) had visits resulting in a urologic procedure during that admission. Of the 60367 patient visits resulting in discharge from the emergency department, 3018 (5.0%) led to a urologic procedure within 7 days, 4407 (7.3%) within 14 days, 5916 (9.8%) within 28 days, and 7667 (12.7%) within 60 days. A total of 3226 visits (5.3%) led to a subsequent emergency department visit within 7 days and 6792 (11.3%) within 60 days. For the entire cohort (admitted and discharged patients), 39 189 (59.2%) had contact with a urologist or primary care practitioner within 60 days. Having Medicaid-only insurance was associated with lower rates of urologic procedures (odds ratio, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.66-0.74) and urologic follow-up (5.6% vs 8.8%; P < .001) and higher rates of primary care follow-up (59.2% vs 47.2%; P < .001) compared with patients with all other insurance types.</p> <p>Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, most adult patients younger than 65 years who were discharged from the emergency department with a diagnosis of renal colic did not undergo a procedure or see a urologist within 60 days. This finding has implications for both the emergency department and outpatient treatment of these patients.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathoapubs/4097
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences
dc.source.pagese1916454


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
schoenfeld_2019_oi_190623.pdf
Size:
995.1Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Copyright 2019 Schoenfeld EM et al. JAMA Network Open. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Copyright 2019 Schoenfeld EM et al. JAMA Network Open. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.