Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorEllis, Randall P.
dc.contributor.authorHsu, Heather E.
dc.contributor.authorSong, Chenlu
dc.contributor.authorKuo, Tzu-Chun
dc.contributor.authorMartins, Bruno
dc.contributor.authorSiracuse, Jeffrey J.
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Ying
dc.contributor.authorAsh, Arlene S.
dc.date2022-08-11T08:09:56.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T16:49:19Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T16:49:19Z
dc.date.issued2020-04-01
dc.date.submitted2020-05-13
dc.identifier.citation<p>Ellis RP, Hsu HE, Song C, Kuo TC, Martins B, Siracuse JJ, Liu Y, Ash AS. Diagnostic Category Prevalence in 3 Classification Systems Across the Transition to the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Apr 1;3(4):e202280. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.2280. PMID: 32267514; PMCID: PMC7142382. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.2280">Link to article on publisher's site</a></p>
dc.identifier.issn2574-3805 (Linking)
dc.identifier.doi10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.2280
dc.identifier.pmid32267514
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/41439
dc.description.abstractImportance: On October 1, 2015, the US transitioned to the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) for recording diagnoses, symptoms, and procedures. It is unknown whether this transition was associated with changes in diagnostic category prevalence based on diagnosis classification systems commonly used for payment and quality reporting. Objective: To assess changes in diagnostic category prevalence associated with the ICD-10-CM transition. Design, Setting, and Participants: This interrupted time series analysis and cross-sectional study examined level and trend changes in diagnostic category prevalence associated with the ICD-10-CM transition and clinically reviewed a subset of diagnostic categories with changes of 20% or more. Data included insurance claim diagnoses from the IBM MarketScan Commercial Database from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2017, for more than 18 million people aged 0 to 64 years with private insurance. Diagnoses were mapped using 3 common diagnostic classification systems: World Health Organization (WHO) disease chapters, Department of Health and Human Services Hierarchical Condition Categories (HHS-HCCs), and Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Clinical Classification System (AHRQ-CCS). Data were analyzed from December 1, 2018, to January 21, 2020. Exposures: US implementation of ICD-10-CM. Main Outcomes and Measures: Monthly rates of individuals with at least 1 diagnosis in a diagnostic classification category per 10000 eligible members. Results: The analytic sample contained information on 2.1 billion enrollee person-months with 3.4 billion clinically assigned diagnoses; the mean (range) monthly sample size was 22.1 (18.4 to 27.1 ) million individuals. While diagnostic category prevalence changed minimally for WHO disease chapters, the ICD-10-CM transition was associated with level changes of 20% or more among 20 of 127 HHS-HCCs (15.7%) and 46 of 282 AHRQ-CCS categories (16.3%) and with trend changes of 20% or more among 12 of 127 of HHS-HCCs (9.4%) and 27 of 282 of AHRQ-CCS categories (9.6%). For HHS-HCCs, monthly rates of individuals with any acute myocardial infarction diagnosis increased 131.5% (95% CI, 124.1% to 138.8%), primarily because HHS added non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction diagnoses to this category. The HHS-HCC for diabetes with chronic complications increased by 92.4% (95% CI, 84.2% to 100.5%), primarily from including new diabetes-related hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia codes, and the rate for completed pregnancy with complications decreased by 54.5% (95% CI, -58.7% to -50.2%) partly due to removing vaginal birth after cesarean delivery as a complication. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that the ICD-10-CM transition was associated with large prevalence changes for many diagnostic categories. Diagnostic classification systems developed using ICD-9-CM may need to be refined using ICD-10-CM data to avoid unintended consequences for disease surveillance, performance assessment, and risk-adjusted payments.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<p><a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=32267514&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a></p>
dc.rights© 2020 Ellis RP et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectInternational Classification of Diseases
dc.subjectICD-9-CM
dc.subjectICD-10-CM
dc.subjectdiagnostic category prevalence
dc.subjectdiagnoses
dc.subjectclassification
dc.subjectUMCCTS funding
dc.subjectDiagnosis
dc.subjectHealth and Medical Administration
dc.subjectHealth Policy
dc.subjectHealth Services Administration
dc.titleDiagnostic Category Prevalence in 3 Classification Systems Across the Transition to the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleJAMA network open
dc.source.volume3
dc.source.issue4
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5238&amp;context=oapubs&amp;unstamped=1
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/oapubs/4219
dc.identifier.contextkey17724372
refterms.dateFOA2022-08-23T16:49:20Z
html.description.abstract<p>Importance: On October 1, 2015, the US transitioned to the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) for recording diagnoses, symptoms, and procedures. It is unknown whether this transition was associated with changes in diagnostic category prevalence based on diagnosis classification systems commonly used for payment and quality reporting.</p> <p>Objective: To assess changes in diagnostic category prevalence associated with the ICD-10-CM transition.</p> <p>Design, Setting, and Participants: This interrupted time series analysis and cross-sectional study examined level and trend changes in diagnostic category prevalence associated with the ICD-10-CM transition and clinically reviewed a subset of diagnostic categories with changes of 20% or more. Data included insurance claim diagnoses from the IBM MarketScan Commercial Database from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2017, for more than 18 million people aged 0 to 64 years with private insurance. Diagnoses were mapped using 3 common diagnostic classification systems: World Health Organization (WHO) disease chapters, Department of Health and Human Services Hierarchical Condition Categories (HHS-HCCs), and Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Clinical Classification System (AHRQ-CCS). Data were analyzed from December 1, 2018, to January 21, 2020.</p> <p>Exposures: US implementation of ICD-10-CM.</p> <p>Main Outcomes and Measures: Monthly rates of individuals with at least 1 diagnosis in a diagnostic classification category per 10000 eligible members.</p> <p>Results: The analytic sample contained information on 2.1 billion enrollee person-months with 3.4 billion clinically assigned diagnoses; the mean (range) monthly sample size was 22.1 (18.4 to 27.1 ) million individuals. While diagnostic category prevalence changed minimally for WHO disease chapters, the ICD-10-CM transition was associated with level changes of 20% or more among 20 of 127 HHS-HCCs (15.7%) and 46 of 282 AHRQ-CCS categories (16.3%) and with trend changes of 20% or more among 12 of 127 of HHS-HCCs (9.4%) and 27 of 282 of AHRQ-CCS categories (9.6%). For HHS-HCCs, monthly rates of individuals with any acute myocardial infarction diagnosis increased 131.5% (95% CI, 124.1% to 138.8%), primarily because HHS added non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction diagnoses to this category. The HHS-HCC for diabetes with chronic complications increased by 92.4% (95% CI, 84.2% to 100.5%), primarily from including new diabetes-related hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia codes, and the rate for completed pregnancy with complications decreased by 54.5% (95% CI, -58.7% to -50.2%) partly due to removing vaginal birth after cesarean delivery as a complication.</p> <p>Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that the ICD-10-CM transition was associated with large prevalence changes for many diagnostic categories. Diagnostic classification systems developed using ICD-9-CM may need to be refined using ICD-10-CM data to avoid unintended consequences for disease surveillance, performance assessment, and risk-adjusted payments.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathoapubs/4219
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences
dc.source.pagese202280


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
ellis_2020_oi_200120.pdf
Size:
1.084Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2020 Ellis RP et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © 2020 Ellis RP et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.