Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGowin, Krisstina
dc.contributor.authorCerny, Jan
dc.date2022-08-11T08:09:56.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T16:49:24Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T16:49:24Z
dc.date.issued2020-05-12
dc.date.submitted2020-06-05
dc.identifier.citation<p>Gowin K, Ballen K, Ahn KW, Hu ZH, Ali H, Arcasoy MO, Devlin R, Coakley M, Gerds AT, Green M, Gupta V, Hobbs G, Jain T, Kandarpa M, Komrokji R, Kuykendall AT, Luber K, Masarova L, Michaelis LC, Patches S, Pariser AC, Rampal R, Stein B, Talpaz M, Verstovsek S, Wadleigh M, Agrawal V, Aljurf M, Angel Diaz M, Avalos BR, Bacher U, Bashey A, Beitinjaneh AM, Cerny J, Chhabra S, Copelan E, Cutler CS, DeFilipp Z, Gadalla SM, Ganguly S, Grunwald MR, Hashmi SK, Kharfan-Dabaja MA, Kindwall-Keller T, Kröger N, Lazarus HM, Liesveld JL, Litzow MR, Marks DI, Nathan S, Nishihori T, Olsson RF, Pawarode A, Rowe JM, Savani BN, Savoie ML, Seo S, Solh M, Tamari R, Verdonck LF, Yared JA, Alyea E, Popat U, Sobecks R, Scott BL, Nakamura R, Mesa R, Saber W. Survival following allogeneic transplant in patients with myelofibrosis. Blood Adv. 2020 May 12;4(9):1965-1973. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2019001084. PMID: 32384540; PMCID: PMC7218417. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2019001084">Link to article on publisher's site</a></p>
dc.identifier.issn2473-9529 (Linking)
dc.identifier.doi10.1182/bloodadvances.2019001084
dc.identifier.pmid32384540
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/41455
dc.description<p>Full author list omitted for brevity. For the full list of authors, see article.</p>
dc.description.abstractAllogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is the only curative therapy for myelofibrosis (MF). In this large multicenter retrospective study, overall survival (OS) in MF patients treated with allogeneic HCT (551 patients) and without HCT (non-HCT) (1377 patients) was analyzed with Cox proportional hazards model. Survival analysis stratified by the Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System (DIPSS) revealed that the first year of treatment arm assignment, due to upfront risk of transplant-related mortality (TRM), HCT was associated with inferior OS compared with non-HCT (non-HCT vs HCT: DIPSS intermediate 1 [Int-1]: hazard ratio [HR] = 0.26, P < .0001; DIPSS-Int-2 and higher: HR, 0.39, P < .0001). Similarly, in the DIPSS low-risk MF group, due to upfront TRM risk, OS was superior with non-HCT therapies compared with HCT in the first-year post treatment arm assignment (HR, 0.16, P = .006). However, after 1 year, OS was not significantly different (HR, 1.38, P = .451). Beyond 1 year of treatment arm assignment, an OS advantage with HCT therapy in Int-1 and higher DIPSS score patients was observed (non-HCT vs HCT: DIPSS-Int-1: HR, 2.64, P < .0001; DIPSS-Int-2 and higher: HR, 2.55, P < .0001). In conclusion, long-term OS advantage with HCT was observed for patients with Int-1 or higher risk MF, but at the cost of early TRM. The magnitude of OS benefit with HCT increased as DIPSS risk score increased and became apparent with longer follow-up.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<p><a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=32384540&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a></p>
dc.rightsCopyright © 2020 by The American Society of Hematology. Publisher PDF posted as allowed by the publisher's author rights policy at https://ashpublications.org/bloodadvances/pages/copyright.
dc.subjectclinical trials and observations
dc.subjectMyeloid Neoplasia
dc.subjecttransplantation
dc.subjectmyelofibrosis
dc.subjectfollow-up
dc.subjectClinical Trials
dc.subjectHealth Services Administration
dc.subjectHealth Services Research
dc.subjectHematology
dc.subjectHemic and Lymphatic Diseases
dc.subjectNeoplasms
dc.subjectOncology
dc.titleSurvival following allogeneic transplant in patients with myelofibrosis
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleBlood advances
dc.source.volume4
dc.source.issue9
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5253&amp;context=oapubs&amp;unstamped=1
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/oapubs/4234
dc.identifier.contextkey17992624
refterms.dateFOA2022-08-23T16:49:24Z
html.description.abstract<p>Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is the only curative therapy for myelofibrosis (MF). In this large multicenter retrospective study, overall survival (OS) in MF patients treated with allogeneic HCT (551 patients) and without HCT (non-HCT) (1377 patients) was analyzed with Cox proportional hazards model. Survival analysis stratified by the Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System (DIPSS) revealed that the first year of treatment arm assignment, due to upfront risk of transplant-related mortality (TRM), HCT was associated with inferior OS compared with non-HCT (non-HCT vs HCT: DIPSS intermediate 1 [Int-1]: hazard ratio [HR] = 0.26, P < .0001; DIPSS-Int-2 and higher: HR, 0.39, P < .0001). Similarly, in the DIPSS low-risk MF group, due to upfront TRM risk, OS was superior with non-HCT therapies compared with HCT in the first-year post treatment arm assignment (HR, 0.16, P = .006). However, after 1 year, OS was not significantly different (HR, 1.38, P = .451). Beyond 1 year of treatment arm assignment, an OS advantage with HCT therapy in Int-1 and higher DIPSS score patients was observed (non-HCT vs HCT: DIPSS-Int-1: HR, 2.64, P < .0001; DIPSS-Int-2 and higher: HR, 2.55, P < .0001). In conclusion, long-term OS advantage with HCT was observed for patients with Int-1 or higher risk MF, but at the cost of early TRM. The magnitude of OS benefit with HCT increased as DIPSS risk score increased and became apparent with longer follow-up.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathoapubs/4234
dc.contributor.departmentDivision of Hematology Oncology, Department of Medicine
dc.source.pages1965-1973


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
advancesadv2019001084.pdf
Size:
858.4Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record