Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorConnolly, Samantha L.
dc.contributor.authorHogan, Timothy P.
dc.contributor.authorShimada, Stephanie L
dc.contributor.authorMiller, Christopher J.
dc.date2022-08-11T08:09:56.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T16:50:01Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T16:50:01Z
dc.date.issued2020-09-07
dc.date.submitted2020-11-02
dc.identifier.citation<p>Connolly SL, Hogan TP, Shimada SL, Miller CJ. Leveraging Implementation Science to Understand Factors Influencing Sustained Use of Mental Health Apps: a Narrative Review. J Technol Behav Sci. 2020 Sep 7:1-13. doi: 10.1007/s41347-020-00165-4. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 32923580; PMCID: PMC7476675. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s41347-020-00165-4">Link to article on publisher's site</a></p>
dc.identifier.issn2366-5963 (Linking)
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s41347-020-00165-4
dc.identifier.pmid32923580
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/41578
dc.description.abstractMental health (MH) smartphone applications (apps), which can aid in self-management of conditions such as depression and anxiety, have demonstrated dramatic growth over the past decade. However, their effectiveness and potential for sustained use remain uncertain. This narrative review leverages implementation science theory to explore factors influencing MH app uptake. The review is guided by the integrated Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (i-PARIHS) framework and discusses the role of the innovation, its recipients, context, and facilitation in influencing successful implementation of MH apps. The review highlights critical literature published between 2015 and 2020 with a focus on depression and anxiety apps. Sources were identified via PubMed, Google Scholar, and Twitter using a range of keywords pertaining to MH apps. Findings suggest that for apps to be successful, they must be advantageous over alternative tools, relatively easy to navigate, and aligned with users' needs, skills, and resources. Significantly more attention must be paid to the complex contexts in which MH app implementation is occurring in order to refine facilitation strategies. The evidence base is still uncertain regarding the effectiveness and usability of MH apps, and much can be learned from the apps we use daily; namely, simpler is better and plans to integrate full behavioral treatments into smartphone form may be misguided. Non-traditional funding mechanisms that are nimble, responsive, and encouraging of industry partnerships will be necessary to move the course of MH app development in the right direction.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<p><a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=32923580&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a></p>
dc.rightsCopyright: This is a U.S. government work and not under copyright protection in the U.S.; foreign copyright protection may apply.
dc.subjectApp
dc.subjectImplementation science
dc.subjectMental health
dc.subjectSmartphone
dc.subjectBehavioral Medicine
dc.subjectHealth Communication
dc.subjectHealth Information Technology
dc.subjectMental and Social Health
dc.subjectPsychiatry and Psychology
dc.titleLeveraging Implementation Science to Understand Factors Influencing Sustained Use of Mental Health Apps: a Narrative Review
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleJournal of technology in behavioral science
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5397&amp;context=oapubs&amp;unstamped=1
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/oapubs/4368
dc.identifier.contextkey20053053
refterms.dateFOA2022-08-23T16:50:01Z
html.description.abstract<p>Mental health (MH) smartphone applications (apps), which can aid in self-management of conditions such as depression and anxiety, have demonstrated dramatic growth over the past decade. However, their effectiveness and potential for sustained use remain uncertain. This narrative review leverages implementation science theory to explore factors influencing MH app uptake. The review is guided by the integrated Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (i-PARIHS) framework and discusses the role of the innovation, its recipients, context, and facilitation in influencing successful implementation of MH apps. The review highlights critical literature published between 2015 and 2020 with a focus on depression and anxiety apps. Sources were identified via PubMed, Google Scholar, and Twitter using a range of keywords pertaining to MH apps. Findings suggest that for apps to be successful, they must be advantageous over alternative tools, relatively easy to navigate, and aligned with users' needs, skills, and resources. Significantly more attention must be paid to the complex contexts in which MH app implementation is occurring in order to refine facilitation strategies. The evidence base is still uncertain regarding the effectiveness and usability of MH apps, and much can be learned from the apps we use daily; namely, simpler is better and plans to integrate full behavioral treatments into smartphone form may be misguided. Non-traditional funding mechanisms that are nimble, responsive, and encouraging of industry partnerships will be necessary to move the course of MH app development in the right direction.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathoapubs/4368
dc.contributor.departmentDivision of Health Informatics and Implementation Science, Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences
dc.source.pages1-13


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Connolly2020_Article_Leveragin ...
Size:
438.6Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record