Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGuharoy, Roy
dc.contributor.authorKrenzelok, Edward P.
dc.date2022-08-11T08:09:57.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T16:50:11Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T16:50:11Z
dc.date.issued2020-10-26
dc.date.submitted2020-11-30
dc.identifier.citation<p>Guharoy R, Krenzelok EP. FDA Emergency Use Authorization: Glass Half Empty? Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Oct 26:ciaa1653. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1653. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 33104216; PMCID: PMC7665427. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaa1653">Link to article on publisher's site</a></p>
dc.identifier.issn1058-4838 (Linking)
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/cid/ciaa1653
dc.identifier.pmid33104216
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/41613
dc.description.abstractRecently, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued emergency use authorization (EUA) of convalescent plasma (CP) for the treatment of COVID-19 hospitalized patients based on a non-peer reviewed open label observational study. Issuance of an EUA without a proven randomized control trial (RCT) sets a dangerous precedent since the premature action drives health care providers and patients away from RCTs that are essential for determining the efficacy and safety of CP. More caution should have been taken based on what was learned from the recently rescinded EUA of hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine debacle which was approved initially based on an anecdotal report. The FDA approval process for determining efficacy and safety must be based solely on data from RCTs to sustain public and professional trust for future treatment or vaccine efforts to be successful.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<p><a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=33104216&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a></p>
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7665427/
dc.subjectemergency use authorization
dc.subjectconvalescent plasma
dc.subjectpublic trust
dc.subjectrandomized control trial
dc.subjectCOVID-19
dc.subjectClinical Trials
dc.subjectHealth Services Administration
dc.subjectInfectious Disease
dc.subjectPharmacy Administration, Policy and Regulation
dc.subjectVirus Diseases
dc.titleUS Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Emergency Use Authorization: Glass Half Full or Glass Half Empty
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5429&amp;context=oapubs&amp;unstamped=1
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/oapubs/4400
dc.identifier.contextkey20344432
refterms.dateFOA2022-08-23T16:50:12Z
html.description.abstract<p>Recently, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued emergency use authorization (EUA) of convalescent plasma (CP) for the treatment of COVID-19 hospitalized patients based on a non-peer reviewed open label observational study. Issuance of an EUA without a proven randomized control trial (RCT) sets a dangerous precedent since the premature action drives health care providers and patients away from RCTs that are essential for determining the efficacy and safety of CP. More caution should have been taken based on what was learned from the recently rescinded EUA of hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine debacle which was approved initially based on an anecdotal report. The FDA approval process for determining efficacy and safety must be based solely on data from RCTs to sustain public and professional trust for future treatment or vaccine efforts to be successful.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathoapubs/4400
dc.contributor.departmentInfectious Diseases


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
ciaa1653.pdf
Size:
161.6Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record