Knowledge-based planning in robotic intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery treatments
dc.contributor.author | Yu, Suhong | |
dc.contributor.author | Xu, Huijun | |
dc.contributor.author | Zhang, Yin | |
dc.contributor.author | Zhang, Xin | |
dc.contributor.author | Dyer, Michael A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Hirsch, Ariel E. | |
dc.contributor.author | Tam Truong, Minh | |
dc.contributor.author | Zhen, Heming | |
dc.date | 2022-08-11T08:09:59.000 | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-08-23T16:51:09Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-08-23T16:51:09Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021-03-01 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2021-05-12 | |
dc.identifier.citation | <p>Yu S, Xu H, Zhang Y, Zhang X, Dyer MA, Hirsch AE, Tam Truong M, Zhen H. Knowledge-based planning in robotic intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery treatments. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2021 Mar;22(3):48-54. doi: 10.1002/acm2.13173. Epub 2021 Feb 9. PMID: 33560592; PMCID: PMC7984472. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13173">Link to article on publisher's site</a></p> | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1526-9914 (Linking) | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1002/acm2.13173 | |
dc.identifier.pmid | 33560592 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/41802 | |
dc.description.abstract | PURPOSE: To develop a knowledge-based planning (KBP) model that predicts dosimetric indices and facilitates planning in CyberKnife intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery/radiotherapy (SRS/SRT). METHODS: Forty CyberKnife SRS/SRT plans were retrospectively used to build a linear KBP model which correlated the equivalent radius of the PTV (req_PTV ) and the equivalent radius of volume that receives a set of prescription dose (req_Vi , where Vi = V10% , V20% ... V120% ). To evaluate the model's predictability, a fourfold cross-validation was performed for dosimetric indices such as gradient measure (GM) and brain V50% . The accuracy of the prediction was quantified by the mean and the standard deviation of the difference between planned and predicted values, (i.e., DeltaGM = GMpred - GMclin and fractional DeltaV50% = (V50%pred - V50%clin )/V50%clin ) and a coefficient of determination, R(2) . Then, the KBP model was incorporated into the planning for another 22 clinical cases. The training plans and the KBP test plans were compared in terms of the new conformity index (nCI) as well as the planning efficiency. RESULTS: Our KBP model showed desirable predictability. For the 40 training plans, the average prediction error from cross-validation was only 0.36 +/- 0.06 mm for DeltaGM, and 0.12 +/- 0.08 for DeltaV50% . The R(2) for the linear fit between req_PTV and req_vi was 0.985 +/- 0.019 for isodose volumes ranging from V10% to V120% ; particularly, R(2) = 0.995 for V50% and R(2) = 0.997 for V100% . Compared to the training plans, our KBP test plan nCI was improved from 1.31 +/- 0.15 to 1.15 +/- 0.08 (P < 0.0001). The efficient automatic generation of the optimization constraints by using our model requested no or little planner's intervention. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated a linear KBP based on PTV volumes that accurately predicts CyberKnife SRS/SRT planning dosimetric indices and greatly helps achieve superior plan quality and planning efficiency. | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.relation | <p><a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=33560592&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a></p> | |
dc.rights | Copyright © 2021 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. | |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | |
dc.subject | Cyberknife | |
dc.subject | knowledge-based planning | |
dc.subject | stereotactic radiosurgery | |
dc.subject | stereotactic radiotherapy | |
dc.subject | Artificial Intelligence and Robotics | |
dc.subject | Physics | |
dc.subject | Radiation Medicine | |
dc.title | Knowledge-based planning in robotic intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery treatments | |
dc.type | Journal Article | |
dc.source.journaltitle | Journal of applied clinical medical physics | |
dc.source.volume | 22 | |
dc.source.issue | 3 | |
dc.identifier.legacyfulltext | https://escholarship.umassmed.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5635&context=oapubs&unstamped=1 | |
dc.identifier.legacycoverpage | https://escholarship.umassmed.edu/oapubs/4604 | |
dc.identifier.contextkey | 22897442 | |
refterms.dateFOA | 2022-08-23T16:51:09Z | |
html.description.abstract | <p>PURPOSE: To develop a knowledge-based planning (KBP) model that predicts dosimetric indices and facilitates planning in CyberKnife intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery/radiotherapy (SRS/SRT).</p> <p>METHODS: Forty CyberKnife SRS/SRT plans were retrospectively used to build a linear KBP model which correlated the equivalent radius of the PTV (req_PTV ) and the equivalent radius of volume that receives a set of prescription dose (req_Vi , where Vi = V10% , V20% ... V120% ). To evaluate the model's predictability, a fourfold cross-validation was performed for dosimetric indices such as gradient measure (GM) and brain V50% . The accuracy of the prediction was quantified by the mean and the standard deviation of the difference between planned and predicted values, (i.e., DeltaGM = GMpred - GMclin and fractional DeltaV50% = (V50%pred - V50%clin )/V50%clin ) and a coefficient of determination, R(2) . Then, the KBP model was incorporated into the planning for another 22 clinical cases. The training plans and the KBP test plans were compared in terms of the new conformity index (nCI) as well as the planning efficiency.</p> <p>RESULTS: Our KBP model showed desirable predictability. For the 40 training plans, the average prediction error from cross-validation was only 0.36 +/- 0.06 mm for DeltaGM, and 0.12 +/- 0.08 for DeltaV50% . The R(2) for the linear fit between req_PTV and req_vi was 0.985 +/- 0.019 for isodose volumes ranging from V10% to V120% ; particularly, R(2) = 0.995 for V50% and R(2) = 0.997 for V100% . Compared to the training plans, our KBP test plan nCI was improved from 1.31 +/- 0.15 to 1.15 +/- 0.08 (P < 0.0001). The efficient automatic generation of the optimization constraints by using our model requested no or little planner's intervention.</p> <p>CONCLUSION: We demonstrated a linear KBP based on PTV volumes that accurately predicts CyberKnife SRS/SRT planning dosimetric indices and greatly helps achieve superior plan quality and planning efficiency.</p> | |
dc.identifier.submissionpath | oapubs/4604 | |
dc.contributor.department | Department of Radiation Oncology | |
dc.source.pages | 48-54 |