Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorYu, Suhong
dc.contributor.authorXu, Huijun
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Yin
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Xin
dc.contributor.authorDyer, Michael A.
dc.contributor.authorHirsch, Ariel E.
dc.contributor.authorTam Truong, Minh
dc.contributor.authorZhen, Heming
dc.date2022-08-11T08:09:59.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T16:51:09Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T16:51:09Z
dc.date.issued2021-03-01
dc.date.submitted2021-05-12
dc.identifier.citation<p>Yu S, Xu H, Zhang Y, Zhang X, Dyer MA, Hirsch AE, Tam Truong M, Zhen H. Knowledge-based planning in robotic intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery treatments. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2021 Mar;22(3):48-54. doi: 10.1002/acm2.13173. Epub 2021 Feb 9. PMID: 33560592; PMCID: PMC7984472. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13173">Link to article on publisher's site</a></p>
dc.identifier.issn1526-9914 (Linking)
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/acm2.13173
dc.identifier.pmid33560592
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/41802
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE: To develop a knowledge-based planning (KBP) model that predicts dosimetric indices and facilitates planning in CyberKnife intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery/radiotherapy (SRS/SRT). METHODS: Forty CyberKnife SRS/SRT plans were retrospectively used to build a linear KBP model which correlated the equivalent radius of the PTV (req_PTV ) and the equivalent radius of volume that receives a set of prescription dose (req_Vi , where Vi = V10% , V20% ... V120% ). To evaluate the model's predictability, a fourfold cross-validation was performed for dosimetric indices such as gradient measure (GM) and brain V50% . The accuracy of the prediction was quantified by the mean and the standard deviation of the difference between planned and predicted values, (i.e., DeltaGM = GMpred - GMclin and fractional DeltaV50% = (V50%pred - V50%clin )/V50%clin ) and a coefficient of determination, R(2) . Then, the KBP model was incorporated into the planning for another 22 clinical cases. The training plans and the KBP test plans were compared in terms of the new conformity index (nCI) as well as the planning efficiency. RESULTS: Our KBP model showed desirable predictability. For the 40 training plans, the average prediction error from cross-validation was only 0.36 +/- 0.06 mm for DeltaGM, and 0.12 +/- 0.08 for DeltaV50% . The R(2) for the linear fit between req_PTV and req_vi was 0.985 +/- 0.019 for isodose volumes ranging from V10% to V120% ; particularly, R(2) = 0.995 for V50% and R(2) = 0.997 for V100% . Compared to the training plans, our KBP test plan nCI was improved from 1.31 +/- 0.15 to 1.15 +/- 0.08 (P < 0.0001). The efficient automatic generation of the optimization constraints by using our model requested no or little planner's intervention. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated a linear KBP based on PTV volumes that accurately predicts CyberKnife SRS/SRT planning dosimetric indices and greatly helps achieve superior plan quality and planning efficiency.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<p><a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=33560592&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a></p>
dc.rightsCopyright © 2021 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectCyberknife
dc.subjectknowledge-based planning
dc.subjectstereotactic radiosurgery
dc.subjectstereotactic radiotherapy
dc.subjectArtificial Intelligence and Robotics
dc.subjectPhysics
dc.subjectRadiation Medicine
dc.titleKnowledge-based planning in robotic intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery treatments
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleJournal of applied clinical medical physics
dc.source.volume22
dc.source.issue3
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5635&amp;context=oapubs&amp;unstamped=1
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/oapubs/4604
dc.identifier.contextkey22897442
refterms.dateFOA2022-08-23T16:51:09Z
html.description.abstract<p>PURPOSE: To develop a knowledge-based planning (KBP) model that predicts dosimetric indices and facilitates planning in CyberKnife intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery/radiotherapy (SRS/SRT).</p> <p>METHODS: Forty CyberKnife SRS/SRT plans were retrospectively used to build a linear KBP model which correlated the equivalent radius of the PTV (req_PTV ) and the equivalent radius of volume that receives a set of prescription dose (req_Vi , where Vi = V10% , V20% ... V120% ). To evaluate the model's predictability, a fourfold cross-validation was performed for dosimetric indices such as gradient measure (GM) and brain V50% . The accuracy of the prediction was quantified by the mean and the standard deviation of the difference between planned and predicted values, (i.e., DeltaGM = GMpred - GMclin and fractional DeltaV50% = (V50%pred - V50%clin )/V50%clin ) and a coefficient of determination, R(2) . Then, the KBP model was incorporated into the planning for another 22 clinical cases. The training plans and the KBP test plans were compared in terms of the new conformity index (nCI) as well as the planning efficiency.</p> <p>RESULTS: Our KBP model showed desirable predictability. For the 40 training plans, the average prediction error from cross-validation was only 0.36 +/- 0.06 mm for DeltaGM, and 0.12 +/- 0.08 for DeltaV50% . The R(2) for the linear fit between req_PTV and req_vi was 0.985 +/- 0.019 for isodose volumes ranging from V10% to V120% ; particularly, R(2) = 0.995 for V50% and R(2) = 0.997 for V100% . Compared to the training plans, our KBP test plan nCI was improved from 1.31 +/- 0.15 to 1.15 +/- 0.08 (P < 0.0001). The efficient automatic generation of the optimization constraints by using our model requested no or little planner's intervention.</p> <p>CONCLUSION: We demonstrated a linear KBP based on PTV volumes that accurately predicts CyberKnife SRS/SRT planning dosimetric indices and greatly helps achieve superior plan quality and planning efficiency.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathoapubs/4604
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Radiation Oncology
dc.source.pages48-54


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
acm2.13173.pdf
Size:
647.2Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Copyright © 2021 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Copyright © 2021 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.