Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWalkey, Allan J.
dc.contributor.authorBashar, Syed K.
dc.contributor.authorHossain, Md Billal.
dc.contributor.authorDing, Eric Y.
dc.contributor.authorAlbuquerque, Daniella
dc.contributor.authorWinter, Michael
dc.contributor.authorChon, Ki H.
dc.contributor.authorMcManus, David D.
dc.date2022-08-11T08:09:59.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T16:51:11Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T16:51:11Z
dc.date.issued2021-02-15
dc.date.submitted2021-05-18
dc.identifier.citation<p>Walkey AJ, Bashar SK, Hossain MB, Ding E, Albuquerque D, Winter M, Chon KH, McManus DD. Development and Validation of an Automated Algorithm to Detect Atrial Fibrillation Within Stored Intensive Care Unit Continuous Electrocardiographic Data: Observational Study. JMIR Cardio. 2021 Feb 15;5(1):e18840. doi: 10.2196/18840. PMID: 33587041. <a href="https://doi.org/10.2196/18840">Link to article on publisher's site</a></p>
dc.identifier.issn2561-1011 (Linking)
dc.identifier.doi10.2196/18840
dc.identifier.pmid33587041
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/41809
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia during critical illness, representing a sepsis-defining cardiac dysfunction associated with adverse outcomes. Large burdens of premature beats and noisy signal during sepsis may pose unique challenges to automated AF detection. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to develop and validate an automated algorithm to accurately identify AF within electronic health care data among critically ill patients with sepsis. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of patients hospitalized with sepsis identified from Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC III) electronic health data with linked electrocardiographic (ECG) telemetry waveforms. Within 3 separate cohorts of 50 patients, we iteratively developed and validated an automated algorithm that identifies ECG signals, removes noise, and identifies irregular rhythm and premature beats in order to identify AF. We compared the automated algorithm to current methods of AF identification in large databases, including ICD-9 (International Classification of Diseases, 9th edition) codes and hourly nurse annotation of heart rhythm. Methods of AF identification were tested against gold-standard manual ECG review. RESULTS: AF detection algorithms that did not differentiate AF from premature atrial and ventricular beats performed modestly, with 76% (95% CI 61%-87%) accuracy. Performance improved (P=.02) with the addition of premature beat detection (validation set accuracy: 94% [95% CI 83%-99%]). Median time between automated and manual detection of AF onset was 30 minutes (25th-75th percentile 0-208 minutes). The accuracy of ICD-9 codes (68%; P=.002 vs automated algorithm) and nurse charting (80%; P=.02 vs algorithm) was lower than that of the automated algorithm. CONCLUSIONS: An automated algorithm using telemetry ECG data can feasibly and accurately detect AF among critically ill patients with sepsis, and represents an improvement in AF detection within large databases.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<p><a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=33587041&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a></p>
dc.rights© Allan J Walkey, Syed K Bashar, Md Billal Hossain, Eric Ding, Daniella Albuquerque, Michael Winter, Ki H Chon, David D McManus. Originally published in JMIR Cardio (http://cardio.jmir.org), 15.02.2021. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Cardio, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://cardio.jmir.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectatrial fibrillation
dc.subjectbig data
dc.subjectdata science
dc.subjectintensive care unit
dc.subjectsepsis
dc.subjectArtificial Intelligence and Robotics
dc.subjectBiomedical Devices and Instrumentation
dc.subjectCardiology
dc.subjectCardiovascular Diseases
dc.subjectData Science
dc.subjectTheory and Algorithms
dc.titleDevelopment and Validation of an Automated Algorithm to Detect Atrial Fibrillation Within Stored Intensive Care Unit Continuous Electrocardiographic Data: Observational Study
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleJMIR cardio
dc.source.volume5
dc.source.issue1
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5641&amp;context=oapubs&amp;unstamped=1
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/oapubs/4610
dc.identifier.contextkey22982177
refterms.dateFOA2022-08-23T16:51:11Z
html.description.abstract<p>BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia during critical illness, representing a sepsis-defining cardiac dysfunction associated with adverse outcomes. Large burdens of premature beats and noisy signal during sepsis may pose unique challenges to automated AF detection.</p> <p>OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to develop and validate an automated algorithm to accurately identify AF within electronic health care data among critically ill patients with sepsis.</p> <p>METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of patients hospitalized with sepsis identified from Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC III) electronic health data with linked electrocardiographic (ECG) telemetry waveforms. Within 3 separate cohorts of 50 patients, we iteratively developed and validated an automated algorithm that identifies ECG signals, removes noise, and identifies irregular rhythm and premature beats in order to identify AF. We compared the automated algorithm to current methods of AF identification in large databases, including ICD-9 (International Classification of Diseases, 9th edition) codes and hourly nurse annotation of heart rhythm. Methods of AF identification were tested against gold-standard manual ECG review.</p> <p>RESULTS: AF detection algorithms that did not differentiate AF from premature atrial and ventricular beats performed modestly, with 76% (95% CI 61%-87%) accuracy. Performance improved (P=.02) with the addition of premature beat detection (validation set accuracy: 94% [95% CI 83%-99%]). Median time between automated and manual detection of AF onset was 30 minutes (25th-75th percentile 0-208 minutes). The accuracy of ICD-9 codes (68%; P=.002 vs automated algorithm) and nurse charting (80%; P=.02 vs algorithm) was lower than that of the automated algorithm.</p> <p>CONCLUSIONS: An automated algorithm using telemetry ECG data can feasibly and accurately detect AF among critically ill patients with sepsis, and represents an improvement in AF detection within large databases.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathoapubs/4610
dc.contributor.departmentGraduate School of Biomedical Sciences
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine
dc.source.pagese18840


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
PDF.pdf
Size:
162.8Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© Allan J Walkey, Syed K Bashar, Md Billal Hossain, Eric Ding, Daniella Albuquerque, Michael Winter, Ki H Chon, David D McManus. Originally published in JMIR Cardio (http://cardio.jmir.org), 15.02.2021. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Cardio, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://cardio.jmir.org, as well as this
copyright and license information must be included.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © Allan J Walkey, Syed K Bashar, Md Billal Hossain, Eric Ding, Daniella Albuquerque, Michael Winter, Ki H Chon, David D McManus. Originally published in JMIR Cardio (http://cardio.jmir.org), 15.02.2021. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Cardio, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://cardio.jmir.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.