Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNagpal, Vandana
dc.contributor.authorPhilbin, Mary
dc.contributor.authorYazdani, Majid
dc.contributor.authorVeerreddy, Prashant
dc.contributor.authorFish, David
dc.contributor.authorReidy, Jennifer
dc.date2022-08-11T08:09:59.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T16:51:22Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T16:51:22Z
dc.date.issued2021-03-10
dc.date.submitted2021-06-14
dc.identifier.citation<p>Nagpal V, Philbin M, Yazdani M, Veerreddy P, Fish D, Reidy J. Effective Goals-of-Care Conversations: From Skills Training to Bedside. MedEdPORTAL. 2021 Mar 10;17:11122. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11122. PMID: 33768153; PMCID: PMC7970639. <a href="https://doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11122">Link to article on publisher's site</a></p>
dc.identifier.issn2374-8265 (Linking)
dc.identifier.doi10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11122
dc.identifier.pmid33768153
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/41844
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Goals-of-care (GOC) conversations are essential to ensure high-quality care for people with serious illness. We developed a simulation experience to train internal medicine residents in GOC conversations near end of life, followed by a real-life GOC conversation as a Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise (Mini-CEX) including direct feedback from participating patients. Methods: The 3-hour simulation session trained teams of two learners each to interact with standardized patients portraying a patient with end-stage heart failure and an accompanying family member. Residents completed pre- and postsurveys regarding their self-assessed abilities and confidence in conducting these conversations. Piloted in 2016, the Mini-CEX was completed in 2017 with 28 residents 3-9 months after simulation. Patients and participating family members were invited to complete an optional, deidentified survey of their experience. Results: From 2015 to 2017, 84 residents completed simulation training. Ninety percent of postsurvey responders felt more prepared to conduct GOC conversations after simulation compared to 42% before training. Eighty percent or more reported confidence in discussing GOC (previously 67%), prognosis (previously 62%), and hospice (previously 49%). Analysis of Mini-CEX scores revealed that the majority of residents' skills were the same or improved compared with their performance in simulation; more than 70% demonstrated improvement in ensuring patients' comfort, displaying empathy, and recognizing/responding to emotion. Almost all patients and families reported feeling heard and satisfied with their conversation with the resident. Discussion: This curriculum was well received, and initial data support its effectiveness in enhancing residents' self-perceived confidence and interpersonal skills in real-world patient encounters.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<p><a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=33768153&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a></p>
dc.rightsCopyright © 2021 Nagpal et al. This is an open-access publication distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial license.
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.subjectClinical Skills Assessment/OSCEs
dc.subjectClinical Teaching/Bedside Teaching
dc.subjectCommunication Skills
dc.subjectGoals-of-Care Conversations
dc.subjectHospice
dc.subjectHospice & Palliative Medicine
dc.subjectInternal Medicine
dc.subjectPalliative Care
dc.subjectSimulation
dc.subjectHealth Communication
dc.subjectHealth Services Administration
dc.subjectInternal Medicine
dc.subjectMedical Education
dc.subjectPalliative Care
dc.titleEffective Goals-of-Care Conversations: From Skills Training to Bedside
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleMedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources
dc.source.volume17
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5678&amp;context=oapubs&amp;unstamped=1
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/oapubs/4647
dc.identifier.contextkey23344518
refterms.dateFOA2022-08-23T16:51:22Z
html.description.abstract<p>Introduction: Goals-of-care (GOC) conversations are essential to ensure high-quality care for people with serious illness. We developed a simulation experience to train internal medicine residents in GOC conversations near end of life, followed by a real-life GOC conversation as a Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise (Mini-CEX) including direct feedback from participating patients.</p> <p>Methods: The 3-hour simulation session trained teams of two learners each to interact with standardized patients portraying a patient with end-stage heart failure and an accompanying family member. Residents completed pre- and postsurveys regarding their self-assessed abilities and confidence in conducting these conversations. Piloted in 2016, the Mini-CEX was completed in 2017 with 28 residents 3-9 months after simulation. Patients and participating family members were invited to complete an optional, deidentified survey of their experience.</p> <p>Results: From 2015 to 2017, 84 residents completed simulation training. Ninety percent of postsurvey responders felt more prepared to conduct GOC conversations after simulation compared to 42% before training. Eighty percent or more reported confidence in discussing GOC (previously 67%), prognosis (previously 62%), and hospice (previously 49%). Analysis of Mini-CEX scores revealed that the majority of residents' skills were the same or improved compared with their performance in simulation; more than 70% demonstrated improvement in ensuring patients' comfort, displaying empathy, and recognizing/responding to emotion. Almost all patients and families reported feeling heard and satisfied with their conversation with the resident.</p> <p>Discussion: This curriculum was well received, and initial data support its effectiveness in enhancing residents' self-perceived confidence and interpersonal skills in real-world patient encounters.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathoapubs/4647
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Medicine
dc.source.pages11122


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
mep_2374_8265.11122.pdf
Size:
129.0Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Copyright © 2021 Nagpal et al. This is an open-access publication distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial license.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Copyright © 2021 Nagpal et al. This is an open-access publication distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial license.