Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPowell, Craig C.
dc.contributor.authorLi, Jian-ming
dc.contributor.authorRodino, Louis
dc.contributor.authorAnderson, Frederick A.
dc.date2022-08-11T08:10:00.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T16:51:37Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T16:51:37Z
dc.date.issued2000-02-05
dc.date.submitted2007-12-10
dc.identifier.citation<p>AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000 Feb;174(2):315-8.</p>
dc.identifier.issn0361-803X (Print)
dc.identifier.doi10.2214/ajr.174.2.1740315
dc.identifier.pmid10658697
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/41892
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: The extravasation detection accessory (EDA) is designed for use during contrast-enhanced CT studies performed with a power injector. The EDA detects the changes in soft-tissue impedance that occur with enhanced extravasation and halts the further infusion of contrast material via a feedback circuit to the injector. We tested the sensitivity of this device in a model of contrast extravasation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Study subjects had an extravasation of 5% dextrose in water (nonionic contrast equivalent) in one arm and 0.9% sodium chloride solution (ionic contrast equivalent) in the other. An EDA was placed over the site of infusion and connected to a power injector. Injections were performed at 0.25 ml/sec (n = 40), 2.5 ml/sec (n = 62), or 5 ml/sec (n = 20). RESULTS: At infusion rates of 2.5 and 5 ml/sec, the device halted the injector in every subject after an average volume of 12.5 +/- 1.6 ml was delivered. At 0.25 ml/sec, the device failed to halt the injector in 11 of 20 events. After reprogramming the algorithm, 10 more subjects were tested at the lowest injection rate. The device halted 18 of 20 extravasation events with an average volume of 3.7 +/- 0.5 ml. CONCLUSION: In our model of contrast extravasation, the EDA halted a power injector with reliability and reproducibility before a large volume of contrast material was delivered. The sensitivity of the device approached, but did not reach, 100%. This device may serve to diminish the morbidity of extravasation events.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<p><a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=10658697&dopt=Abstract">Link to to article in PubMed</a></p>
dc.relation.urlhttps://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.174.2.1740315
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectEvaluation Studies
dc.subjectExtravasation of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Materials
dc.subjectcontrol
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectMiddle Aged
dc.subject*Tomography, X-Ray Computed
dc.subjectLife Sciences
dc.subjectMedicine and Health Sciences
dc.titleA new device to limit extravasation during contrast-enhanced CT
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleAJR. American journal of roentgenology
dc.source.volume174
dc.source.issue2
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/oapubs/47
dc.identifier.contextkey403064
html.description.abstract<p>OBJECTIVE: The extravasation detection accessory (EDA) is designed for use during contrast-enhanced CT studies performed with a power injector. The EDA detects the changes in soft-tissue impedance that occur with enhanced extravasation and halts the further infusion of contrast material via a feedback circuit to the injector. We tested the sensitivity of this device in a model of contrast extravasation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Study subjects had an extravasation of 5% dextrose in water (nonionic contrast equivalent) in one arm and 0.9% sodium chloride solution (ionic contrast equivalent) in the other. An EDA was placed over the site of infusion and connected to a power injector. Injections were performed at 0.25 ml/sec (n = 40), 2.5 ml/sec (n = 62), or 5 ml/sec (n = 20). RESULTS: At infusion rates of 2.5 and 5 ml/sec, the device halted the injector in every subject after an average volume of 12.5 +/- 1.6 ml was delivered. At 0.25 ml/sec, the device failed to halt the injector in 11 of 20 events. After reprogramming the algorithm, 10 more subjects were tested at the lowest injection rate. The device halted 18 of 20 extravasation events with an average volume of 3.7 +/- 0.5 ml. CONCLUSION: In our model of contrast extravasation, the EDA halted a power injector with reliability and reproducibility before a large volume of contrast material was delivered. The sensitivity of the device approached, but did not reach, 100%. This device may serve to diminish the morbidity of extravasation events.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathoapubs/47
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Surgery
dc.source.pages315-8


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record