Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKim, Ji Eun
dc.contributor.authorPark, Sang Joon
dc.contributor.authorKim, Yong Chul
dc.contributor.authorMin, Sang-Il
dc.contributor.authorHa, Jongwon
dc.contributor.authorKim, Yon Su
dc.contributor.authorYoon, Soon Ho
dc.contributor.authorHan, Seung Seok
dc.date2022-08-11T08:10:00.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T16:51:48Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T16:51:48Z
dc.date.issued2021-05-25
dc.date.submitted2021-09-21
dc.identifier.citation<p>Kim JE, Park SJ, Kim YC, Min SI, Ha J, Kim YS, Yoon SH, Han SS. Deep Learning-Based Quantification of Visceral Fat Volumes Predicts Posttransplant Diabetes Mellitus in Kidney Transplant Recipients. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 May 25;8:632097. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.632097. PMID: 34113628; PMCID: PMC8185023. <a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.632097">Link to article on publisher's site</a></p>
dc.identifier.issn2296-858X (Linking)
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fmed.2021.632097
dc.identifier.pmid34113628
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/41928
dc.description.abstractBackground: Because obesity is associated with the risk of posttransplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM), the precise estimation of visceral fat mass before transplantation may be helpful. Herein, we addressed whether a deep-learning based volumetric fat quantification on pretransplant computed tomographic images predicted the risk of PTDM more precisely than body mass index (BMI). Methods: We retrospectively included a total of 718 nondiabetic kidney recipients who underwent pretransplant abdominal computed tomography. The 2D (waist) and 3D (waist or abdominal) volumes of visceral, subcutaneous, and total fat masses were automatically quantified using the deep neural network. The predictability of the PTDM risk was estimated using a multivariate Cox model and compared among the fat parameters using the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROCs). Results: PTDM occurred in 179 patients (24.9%) during the median follow-up period of 5 years (interquartile range, 2.5-8.6 years). All the fat parameters predicted the risk of PTDM, but the visceral and total fat volumes from 2D and 3D evaluations had higher AUROC values than BMI did, and the best predictor of PTDM was the 3D abdominal visceral fat volumes [AUROC, 0.688 (0.636-0.741)]. The addition of the 3D abdominal VF volume to the model with clinical risk factors increased the predictability of PTDM, but BMI did not. Conclusions: A deep-learning based quantification of visceral fat volumes on computed tomographic images better predicts the risk of PTDM after kidney transplantation than BMI.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<p><a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=34113628&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a></p>
dc.rightsCopyright © 2021 Kim, Park, Kim, Min, Ha, Kim, Yoon and Han. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectartificial intelligence
dc.subjectbody mass index
dc.subjectdeep learning
dc.subjectfat
dc.subjectkidney transplantation
dc.subjectpost-transplant diabetes mellitus
dc.subjectArtificial Intelligence and Robotics
dc.subjectEndocrine System Diseases
dc.subjectNutritional and Metabolic Diseases
dc.subjectRadiology
dc.subjectSurgical Procedures, Operative
dc.titleDeep Learning-Based Quantification of Visceral Fat Volumes Predicts Posttransplant Diabetes Mellitus in Kidney Transplant Recipients
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleFrontiers in medicine
dc.source.volume8
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5766&amp;context=oapubs&amp;unstamped=1
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/oapubs/4733
dc.identifier.contextkey25048790
refterms.dateFOA2022-08-23T16:51:48Z
html.description.abstract<p>Background: Because obesity is associated with the risk of posttransplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM), the precise estimation of visceral fat mass before transplantation may be helpful. Herein, we addressed whether a deep-learning based volumetric fat quantification on pretransplant computed tomographic images predicted the risk of PTDM more precisely than body mass index (BMI).</p> <p>Methods: We retrospectively included a total of 718 nondiabetic kidney recipients who underwent pretransplant abdominal computed tomography. The 2D (waist) and 3D (waist or abdominal) volumes of visceral, subcutaneous, and total fat masses were automatically quantified using the deep neural network. The predictability of the PTDM risk was estimated using a multivariate Cox model and compared among the fat parameters using the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROCs).</p> <p>Results: PTDM occurred in 179 patients (24.9%) during the median follow-up period of 5 years (interquartile range, 2.5-8.6 years). All the fat parameters predicted the risk of PTDM, but the visceral and total fat volumes from 2D and 3D evaluations had higher AUROC values than BMI did, and the best predictor of PTDM was the 3D abdominal visceral fat volumes [AUROC, 0.688 (0.636-0.741)]. The addition of the 3D abdominal VF volume to the model with clinical risk factors increased the predictability of PTDM, but BMI did not.</p> <p>Conclusions: A deep-learning based quantification of visceral fat volumes on computed tomographic images better predicts the risk of PTDM after kidney transplantation than BMI.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathoapubs/4733
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Radiology
dc.source.pages632097


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
fmed_08_632097.pdf
Size:
1.260Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Copyright © 2021 Kim, Park, Kim, Min, Ha, Kim, Yoon and Han. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Copyright © 2021 Kim, Park, Kim, Min, Ha, Kim, Yoon and Han. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.