Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGaspari, Romolo Joseph
dc.contributor.authorTeran, Felipe
dc.contributor.authorKamilaris, Andrew
dc.contributor.authorGleeson, Timothy P.
dc.date2022-08-11T08:10:01.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T16:52:13Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T16:52:13Z
dc.date.issued2021-03-06
dc.date.submitted2021-12-14
dc.identifier.citation<p>Gaspari R, Teran F, Kamilaris A, Gleeson T. Development and validation of a novel image quality rating scale for echocardiography during cardiac arrest. Resusc Plus. 2021 Mar 6;6:100097. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2021.100097. PMID: 34223362; PMCID: PMC8244517. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resplu.2021.100097">Link to article on publisher's site</a></p>
dc.identifier.issn2666-5204 (Linking)
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.resplu.2021.100097
dc.identifier.pmid34223362
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/42012
dc.description.abstractObjective: Research into echocardiography (echo) during cardiac arrest has suffered from methodological flaws that limit aggregation of findings. We developed and validated a novel image rating scale for qualitative analysis of echo images obtained during resuscitation. Methods: A novel 5-point ordinal rating scale was developed and validated using recorded echo images from 145 consecutive cardiac arrest patients. Recorded echo images were reviewed in a blinded fashion by investigators experienced in cardiac arrest echo, and image quality was rated using this scale. Cardiac activity was subsequently classified as no activity, disorganized activity and organized activity. The primary outcome was inter-rater agreement using the image quality rating scale. Secondary outcome was the qualitative evaluation of the type of cardiac activity. Results: A total of 235 ultrasounds were analyzed by study investigators using the image quality rating scale. The overall image quality agreement between reviewers using the scale was good with a weighted kappa of 0.65. Agreement for image quality in subxyphoid images was greater than in parasternal images (0.65-0.52). Echo analysis of cardiac activity showed no activity (33%), disorganized activity (18%), and organized activity (49%). Agreement was great for presence or absence of "cardiac activity" and "organized cardiac activity" with a kappa of 0.84 and 0.78. Conclusions: A novel image quality rating scale for echo during cardiac arrest demonstrates substantial agreement between reviewers. Agreement regarding the presence or absence, as well as the organization of cardiac activity was substantial.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<p><a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=34223362&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a></p>
dc.rights© 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subject95%CI
dc.subject95% confidence intervals
dc.subjectACLS
dc.subjectAdvanced Cardiac Life Support
dc.subjectCPR
dc.subjectCardiopulmonary Resuscitation
dc.subjectCardiac arrest
dc.subjectECG
dc.subjectElectrocardiography
dc.subjectED
dc.subjectEmergency Department
dc.subjectEcho
dc.subjectEchocardiography
dc.subjectEchocardiography
dc.subjectOHCA
dc.subjectOut of hospital Cardiac Arrest
dc.subjectResearch methodology
dc.subjectUltrasound image quality
dc.subjectAnalytical, Diagnostic and Therapeutic Techniques and Equipment
dc.subjectCardiovascular Diseases
dc.subjectEmergency Medicine
dc.titleDevelopment and validation of a novel image quality rating scale for echocardiography during cardiac arrest
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleResuscitation plus
dc.source.volume6
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5848&amp;context=oapubs&amp;unstamped=1
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/oapubs/4815
dc.identifier.contextkey26839329
refterms.dateFOA2022-08-23T16:52:14Z
html.description.abstract<p>Objective: Research into echocardiography (echo) during cardiac arrest has suffered from methodological flaws that limit aggregation of findings. We developed and validated a novel image rating scale for qualitative analysis of echo images obtained during resuscitation.</p> <p>Methods: A novel 5-point ordinal rating scale was developed and validated using recorded echo images from 145 consecutive cardiac arrest patients. Recorded echo images were reviewed in a blinded fashion by investigators experienced in cardiac arrest echo, and image quality was rated using this scale. Cardiac activity was subsequently classified as no activity, disorganized activity and organized activity. The primary outcome was inter-rater agreement using the image quality rating scale. Secondary outcome was the qualitative evaluation of the type of cardiac activity.</p> <p>Results: A total of 235 ultrasounds were analyzed by study investigators using the image quality rating scale. The overall image quality agreement between reviewers using the scale was good with a weighted kappa of 0.65. Agreement for image quality in subxyphoid images was greater than in parasternal images (0.65-0.52). Echo analysis of cardiac activity showed no activity (33%), disorganized activity (18%), and organized activity (49%). Agreement was great for presence or absence of "cardiac activity" and "organized cardiac activity" with a kappa of 0.84 and 0.78.</p> <p>Conclusions: A novel image quality rating scale for echo during cardiac arrest demonstrates substantial agreement between reviewers. Agreement regarding the presence or absence, as well as the organization of cardiac activity was substantial.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathoapubs/4815
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Emergency Medicine
dc.source.pages100097


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Publisher version
Thumbnail
Name:
1_s2.0_S2666520421000229_main.pdf
Size:
382.5Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/
licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).