Differences in Perceived and Predicted Bleeding Risk in Older Adults With Atrial Fibrillation: The SAGE-AF Study
Authors
Bamgbade, Benita A.McManus, David D.
Helm, Robert
Mehawej, Jordy
Gurwitz, Jerry H.
Mailhot, Tanya
Abu, Hawa Ozien
Goldberg, Robert J.
Wang, Zi-Yue
Tisminetzky, Mayra
Pierre-Louis, Isabelle C.
Saczynski, Jane S.
UMass Chan Affiliations
Department of Population and Quantitative Health SciencesMeyers Primary Care Institute
Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine
Document Type
Journal ArticlePublication Date
2021-09-07Keywords
anticoagulantatrial fibrillation
bleeding risk perception
predicted bleeding risk
Cardiology
Cardiovascular Diseases
Geriatrics
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Background Little research has evaluated patient bleeding risk perceptions in comparison with calculated bleeding risk among oral anticoagulant users with atrial fibrillation. Our objective was to investigate underestimation of bleeding risk and to describe the characteristics and patient-reported outcomes associated with underestimation of bleeding risk. Methods and Results In the SAGE-AF (Systematic Assessment of Geriatric Elements in Atrial Fibrillation) study, a prospective cohort study of patients > /=65 years with atrial fibrillation, a CHA2DS2-VASc risk score > /=2 and who were on oral anticoagulant therapy, we compared patients' self-reported bleeding risk with their predicted bleeding risk from their HAS-BLED score. Among the 754 participants (mean age 74.8 years, 48.3% women), 68.0% underestimated their bleeding risk. Participants who were Asian or Pacific Islander, Black, Native American or Alaskan Native, Mixed Race or Hispanic (non-White) (adjusted OR [AOR], 0.45; 95% CI, 0.24-0.82) and women (AOR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.40-0.95) had significantly lower odds of underestimating their bleeding risk than respective comparison groups. Participants with a history of bleeding (AOR, 3.07; 95% CI, 1.73-5.44) and prior hypertension (AOR, 4.33; 95% CI, 2.43-7.72), stroke (AOR, 5.18; 95% CI, 1.87-14.40), or renal disease (AOR, 5.05; 95% CI, 2.98-8.57) had significantly higher odds of underestimating their bleeding risk. Conclusions We found that more than two-thirds of patients with atrial fibrillation on oral anticoagulant therapy underestimated their bleeding risk and that participants with a history of bleeding and several comorbid conditions were more likely to underestimate their bleeding risk whereas non-Whites and women were less likely to underestimate their bleeding risk. Clinicians should ensure that patients prescribed oral anticoagulant therapy have a thorough understanding of bleeding risk.Source
Bamgbade BA, McManus DD, Helm R, Mehawej J, Gurwitz JH, Mailhot T, Abu HO, Goldberg R, Wang Z, Tisminetzky M, Pierre-Louis IC, Saczynski JS. Differences in Perceived and Predicted Bleeding Risk in Older Adults With Atrial Fibrillation: The SAGE-AF Study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Sep 7;10(17):e019979. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.019979. Epub 2021 Aug 16. PMID: 34398677; PMCID: PMC8649256. Link to article on publisher's site
DOI
10.1161/JAHA.120.019979Permanent Link to this Item
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/42091PubMed ID
34398677Related Resources
Rights
Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.Distribution License
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1161/JAHA.120.019979
Scopus Count
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.