Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRaptopoulos, Vassilios D.
dc.contributor.authorDavidoff, Ashley
dc.contributor.authorKarellas, Andrew
dc.contributor.authorDavis, Michael A.
dc.contributor.authorCoolbaugh, Brian L.
dc.contributor.authorSmith, Edward H.
dc.date2022-08-11T08:10:04.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T16:54:02Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T16:54:02Z
dc.date.issued1988-06-01
dc.date.submitted2007-12-10
dc.identifier.citation<p>AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1988 Jun;150(6):1303-6.</p>
dc.identifier.issn0361-803X (Print)
dc.identifier.doi10.2214/ajr.150.6.1303
dc.identifier.pmid3259368
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/42407
dc.description.abstractVisualization of the head of the pancreas by CT was prospectively evaluated in two groups of 100 patients who did not have pancreatic disease. Patients were given either a fat-density oral contrast material (12.5% corn-oil emulsion and metoclopramide) or a conventional high-density oral contrast material (barium suspension or iodinated solution). There was no statistically significant difference in the subjects' tolerance to the two regimens. There was, however, a significant improvement in ability to distinguish the head of the pancreas from the duodenal C-loop when the fat-density contrast material was given. When pancreaticoduodenal discrimination was graded, patients given corn-oil emulsion and metoclopramide received an average score of 0.94, whereas those given the high-density agent received an average score of 0.74, with 1.00 being the highest possible score (p less than .005). These data suggest that for routine CT evaluation of the head of the pancreas, a combination of corn-oil emulsion and metoclopramide may be superior to the conventional high-density oral contrast agents given without metoclopramide.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<p><a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=3259368&dopt=Abstract ">Link to article in PubMed</a></p>
dc.relation.urlhttps://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.150.6.1303
dc.subjectAdministration, Oral
dc.subjectContrast Media
dc.subjectCorn Oil
dc.subjectDuodenum
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectMetoclopramide
dc.subjectMiddle Aged
dc.subjectPancreas
dc.subjectProspective Studies
dc.subject*Tomography, X-Ray Computed
dc.subjectLife Sciences
dc.subjectMedicine and Health Sciences
dc.titleCT of the pancreas with a fat-density oral contrast regimen
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleAJR. American journal of roentgenology
dc.source.volume150
dc.source.issue6
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/oapubs/76
dc.identifier.contextkey403135
html.description.abstract<p>Visualization of the head of the pancreas by CT was prospectively evaluated in two groups of 100 patients who did not have pancreatic disease. Patients were given either a fat-density oral contrast material (12.5% corn-oil emulsion and metoclopramide) or a conventional high-density oral contrast material (barium suspension or iodinated solution). There was no statistically significant difference in the subjects' tolerance to the two regimens. There was, however, a significant improvement in ability to distinguish the head of the pancreas from the duodenal C-loop when the fat-density contrast material was given. When pancreaticoduodenal discrimination was graded, patients given corn-oil emulsion and metoclopramide received an average score of 0.94, whereas those given the high-density agent received an average score of 0.74, with 1.00 being the highest possible score (p less than .005). These data suggest that for routine CT evaluation of the head of the pancreas, a combination of corn-oil emulsion and metoclopramide may be superior to the conventional high-density oral contrast agents given without metoclopramide.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathoapubs/76
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Radiology
dc.source.pages1303-6


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record