Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHarley, Carol A.
dc.contributor.authorHolt, Jonathan A.
dc.contributor.authorTurner, Rhiannon
dc.contributor.authorTipper, Donald J.
dc.date2022-08-11T08:10:04.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T16:54:06Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T16:54:06Z
dc.date.issued1998-09-12
dc.date.submitted2008-08-04
dc.identifier.citation<p>J Biol Chem. 1998 Sep 18;273(38):24963-71.</p>
dc.identifier.issn0021-9258 (Print)
dc.identifier.doi10.1074/jbc.273.38.24963
dc.identifier.pmid9733804
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/42424
dc.description.abstractThe determinants of transmembrane protein insertion orientation at the endoplasmic reticulum have been investigated in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using variants of a Type III (naturally exofacial N terminus (Nexo)) transmembrane fusion protein derived from the N terminus of Ste2p, the alpha-factor receptor. Small positive and negative charges adjacent to the transmembrane segment had equal and opposite effects on orientation, and this effect was independent of N- or C-terminal location, consistent with a purely electrostatic interaction with response mechanisms. A 3:1 bias toward Nexo insertion, observed in the absence of a charge difference, was shown to reflect the Nexo bias conferred by longer transmembrane segments. Orientation correlated best with total hydrophobicity rather than length, but it was also strongly affected by the distribution of hydrophobicity within the transmembrane segment. The most hydrophobic terminus was preferentially translocated. Insertion orientation thus depends on integration of responses to at least three parameters: charge difference across a transmembrane segment, its total hydrophobicity, and its hydrophobicity gradient. Relative signal strengths were estimated, and consequences for topology prediction are discussed. Responses to transmembrane sequence may depend on protein-translocon interactions, but responses to charge difference may be mediated by the electrostatic field provided by anionic phospholipids.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<p><a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=9733804&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a></p>
dc.relation.urlhttps://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.273.38.24963
dc.subjectAmino Acid Sequence
dc.subjectBase Sequence
dc.subjectDNA Primers
dc.subjectElectrostatics
dc.subjectEndoplasmic Reticulum
dc.subjectIntracellular Membranes
dc.subjectMembrane Fusion
dc.subjectMolecular Sequence Data
dc.subjectPolymerase Chain Reaction
dc.subjectProtein Conformation
dc.subjectReceptors, Mating Factor
dc.subjectReceptors, Peptide
dc.subjectRecombinant Fusion Proteins
dc.subjectSaccharomyces cerevisiae
dc.subject*Transcription Factors
dc.subjectVariation (Genetics)
dc.subjectLife Sciences
dc.subjectMedicine and Health Sciences
dc.titleTransmembrane protein insertion orientation in yeast depends on the charge difference across transmembrane segments, their total hydrophobicity, and its distribution
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleThe Journal of biological chemistry
dc.source.volume273
dc.source.issue38
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/oapubs/775
dc.identifier.contextkey564690
html.description.abstract<p>The determinants of transmembrane protein insertion orientation at the endoplasmic reticulum have been investigated in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using variants of a Type III (naturally exofacial N terminus (Nexo)) transmembrane fusion protein derived from the N terminus of Ste2p, the alpha-factor receptor. Small positive and negative charges adjacent to the transmembrane segment had equal and opposite effects on orientation, and this effect was independent of N- or C-terminal location, consistent with a purely electrostatic interaction with response mechanisms. A 3:1 bias toward Nexo insertion, observed in the absence of a charge difference, was shown to reflect the Nexo bias conferred by longer transmembrane segments. Orientation correlated best with total hydrophobicity rather than length, but it was also strongly affected by the distribution of hydrophobicity within the transmembrane segment. The most hydrophobic terminus was preferentially translocated. Insertion orientation thus depends on integration of responses to at least three parameters: charge difference across a transmembrane segment, its total hydrophobicity, and its hydrophobicity gradient. Relative signal strengths were estimated, and consequences for topology prediction are discussed. Responses to transmembrane sequence may depend on protein-translocon interactions, but responses to charge difference may be mediated by the electrostatic field provided by anionic phospholipids.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathoapubs/775
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology
dc.source.pages24963-71


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record