Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKhidir, Hazar
dc.contributor.authorMcWilliams, J. Michael
dc.contributor.authorO'Malley, A. James
dc.contributor.authorZaborski, Lawrence
dc.contributor.authorLandon, Bruce E.
dc.contributor.authorSmulowitz, Peter B.
dc.date2022-08-11T08:10:06.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T16:55:27Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T16:55:27Z
dc.date.issued2021-09-01
dc.date.submitted2022-06-02
dc.identifier.citation<p>Khidir H, McWilliams JM, O'Malley AJ, Zaborski L, Landon BE, Smulowitz PB. Analysis of Consistency in Emergency Department Physician Variation in Propensity for Admission Across Patient Sociodemographic Groups. JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Sep 1;4(9):e2125193. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.25193. PMID: 34546373; PMCID: PMC8456378. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.25193">Link to article on publisher's site</a></p>
dc.identifier.issn2574-3805 (Linking)
dc.identifier.doi10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.25193
dc.identifier.pmid34546373
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/42718
dc.description.abstractImportance: Sociodemographic disparities in health care and variation in physician practice patterns have been well documented; however, the contribution of variation in individual physician care practices to health disparities is challenging to quantify. Emergency department (ED) physicians vary in their propensity to admit patients. The consistency of this variation across sociodemographic groups may help determine whether physician-specific factors are associated with care differences between patient groups. Objective: To estimate the consistency of ED physician admission propensities across categories of patient sex, race and ethnicity, and Medicaid enrollment. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study analyzed Medicare fee-for-service claims for ED visits from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2019, in a 10% random sample of hospitals. The allocation of patients to ED physicians in the acute care setting was used to isolate physician-level variation in admission rates that reflects variation in physician decision-making. Multi-level models with physician random effects and hospital fixed effects were used to estimate the within-hospital physician variation in admission propensity for different patient sociodemographic subgroups and the covariation in these propensities between subgroups (consistency), adjusting for primary diagnosis and comorbidities. Main Outcomes and Measures: Admission from the ED. Results: The analysis included 4567760 ED visits involving 2334361 beneficiaries and 15767 physicians in 396 EDs. The mean (SD) age of the beneficiaries was 78 (8.2) years, 2700661 visits (59.1%) were by women, and most patients (3839055 [84.1%]) were not eligible for Medicaid. Of 4 473 978 race and ethnicity reports on enrollment, 103 699 patients (2.3%) were Asian/Pacific Islander, 421 588 (9.4%) were Black, 257 422 (5.8%) were Hispanic, and 3 691 269 (82.5%) were non-Hispanic White. Within hospitals, adjusted rates of admission were higher for men (36.8%; 95% CI, 36.8%-36.9%) than for women (33.7%; 95% CI, 33.7%-33.8%); higher for non-Hispanic White (36.0%; 95% CI, 35.9%-36.0%) than for Asian/Pacific Islander (33.6%; 95% CI, 33.3%-33.9%), Black (30.2%; 95% CI, 30.0%-30.3%), or Hispanic (31.1%; 95% CI, 30.9%-31.2%) beneficiaries; and higher for beneficiaries dually enrolled in Medicaid (36.3%; 95% CI, 36.2%-36.5%) than for those who were not (34.7%; 95% CI, 34.7%-34.8%). Within hospitals, physicians varied in the percentage of patients admitted, ranging from 22.4% for physicians at the 10th percentile to 47.6% for physicians at the 90th percentile of the estimated distribution. Physician admission propensities were correlated between men and women (r = 0.99), Black and non-Hispanic White patients (r = 0.98), and patients who were dually enrolled and not dually enrolled in Medicaid (r = 0.98). Conclusions and Relevance: This cross-sectional study indicated that, although overall rates of admission differ systematically by patient sociodemographic factors, an individual physician's propensity to admit relative to other physicians appears to be applied consistently across sociodemographic groups of patients.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<p><a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=34546373&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a></p>
dc.rightsCopyright 2021 Khidir H et al. JAMA Network Open. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectemergency department
dc.subjectpatient admissions
dc.subjectphysicians
dc.subjectvariation
dc.subjectpatient sociodemographic groups
dc.subjectEmergency Medicine
dc.subjectHealth Services Administration
dc.subjectHealth Services Research
dc.titleAnalysis of Consistency in Emergency Department Physician Variation in Propensity for Admission Across Patient Sociodemographic Groups
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleJAMA network open
dc.source.volume4
dc.source.issue9
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5997&amp;context=oapubs&amp;unstamped=1
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/oapubs/4962
dc.identifier.contextkey29511298
refterms.dateFOA2022-08-23T16:55:28Z
html.description.abstract<p>Importance: Sociodemographic disparities in health care and variation in physician practice patterns have been well documented; however, the contribution of variation in individual physician care practices to health disparities is challenging to quantify. Emergency department (ED) physicians vary in their propensity to admit patients. The consistency of this variation across sociodemographic groups may help determine whether physician-specific factors are associated with care differences between patient groups.</p> <p>Objective: To estimate the consistency of ED physician admission propensities across categories of patient sex, race and ethnicity, and Medicaid enrollment.</p> <p>Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study analyzed Medicare fee-for-service claims for ED visits from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2019, in a 10% random sample of hospitals. The allocation of patients to ED physicians in the acute care setting was used to isolate physician-level variation in admission rates that reflects variation in physician decision-making. Multi-level models with physician random effects and hospital fixed effects were used to estimate the within-hospital physician variation in admission propensity for different patient sociodemographic subgroups and the covariation in these propensities between subgroups (consistency), adjusting for primary diagnosis and comorbidities.</p> <p>Main Outcomes and Measures: Admission from the ED.</p> <p>Results: The analysis included 4567760 ED visits involving 2334361 beneficiaries and 15767 physicians in 396 EDs. The mean (SD) age of the beneficiaries was 78 (8.2) years, 2700661 visits (59.1%) were by women, and most patients (3839055 [84.1%]) were not eligible for Medicaid. Of 4 473 978 race and ethnicity reports on enrollment, 103 699 patients (2.3%) were Asian/Pacific Islander, 421 588 (9.4%) were Black, 257 422 (5.8%) were Hispanic, and 3 691 269 (82.5%) were non-Hispanic White. Within hospitals, adjusted rates of admission were higher for men (36.8%; 95% CI, 36.8%-36.9%) than for women (33.7%; 95% CI, 33.7%-33.8%); higher for non-Hispanic White (36.0%; 95% CI, 35.9%-36.0%) than for Asian/Pacific Islander (33.6%; 95% CI, 33.3%-33.9%), Black (30.2%; 95% CI, 30.0%-30.3%), or Hispanic (31.1%; 95% CI, 30.9%-31.2%) beneficiaries; and higher for beneficiaries dually enrolled in Medicaid (36.3%; 95% CI, 36.2%-36.5%) than for those who were not (34.7%; 95% CI, 34.7%-34.8%). Within hospitals, physicians varied in the percentage of patients admitted, ranging from 22.4% for physicians at the 10th percentile to 47.6% for physicians at the 90th percentile of the estimated distribution. Physician admission propensities were correlated between men and women (r = 0.99), Black and non-Hispanic White patients (r = 0.98), and patients who were dually enrolled and not dually enrolled in Medicaid (r = 0.98).</p> <p>Conclusions and Relevance: This cross-sectional study indicated that, although overall rates of admission differ systematically by patient sociodemographic factors, an individual physician's propensity to admit relative to other physicians appears to be applied consistently across sociodemographic groups of patients.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathoapubs/4962
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Emergency Medicine
dc.source.pagese2125193


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
khidir_2021_oi_210743_16316275 ...
Size:
1.077Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Copyright 2021 Khidir H et al. JAMA Network Open. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Copyright 2021 Khidir H et al. JAMA Network Open. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.