Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRaglan, Greta B.
dc.contributor.authorCain, Joanna
dc.contributor.authorSchulkin, Jay
dc.date2022-08-11T08:10:06.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T16:55:39Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T16:55:39Z
dc.date.issued2015-07-14
dc.date.submitted2016-01-20
dc.identifier.citationJ Healthc Qual. 2015 Jul 14. [Epub ahead of print] <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jhq.12083">Link to article on publisher's site</a>
dc.identifier.issn1062-2551 (Linking)
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jhq.12083
dc.identifier.pmid25155041
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/42755
dc.description.abstractOn a day-to-day basis, doctors must decide which treatments are most beneficial for their patients, and which make the most sense in terms of costs. In medical decision making, factors such as efficiency and cost-effectiveness can be particularly challenging to navigate because many of the most expensive procedures encountered in medical practice are also high-stake treatments for patients. One-hundred-six obstetricians-gynecologists (Obs/Gyns) completed a survey asking them to allocate the following resources in scenarios in which they are scarce: human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccinations, mammograms, and in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatments. Additional questions focused on how fairness and cost-effectiveness factored into the allocation decisions of each group. Results indicated that Obs/Gyns were more efficient in their distribution of HPV vaccinations and mammograms than in their distribution of IVF treatments. More efficient responding was associated with placing less emphasis on fairness in decision making. This study demonstrates the differences that exist in the emphasis that physicians place on medical evidence, cost, outcomes, and perceptions of fair (equal) allocation when faced with different costs and health impacts.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=25155041&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a>
dc.relation.urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jhq.12083
dc.subjectFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications
dc.subjectHealth Services Administration
dc.subjectObstetrics and Gynecology
dc.subjectWomen's Health
dc.titleBrief Report on Obstetricians'/Gynecologists' Distribution of Scarce Resources
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleJournal for healthcare quality : official publication of the National Association for Healthcare Quality
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/obgyn_pp/107
dc.identifier.contextkey8028975
html.description.abstract<p>On a day-to-day basis, doctors must decide which treatments are most beneficial for their patients, and which make the most sense in terms of costs. In medical decision making, factors such as efficiency and cost-effectiveness can be particularly challenging to navigate because many of the most expensive procedures encountered in medical practice are also high-stake treatments for patients. One-hundred-six obstetricians-gynecologists (Obs/Gyns) completed a survey asking them to allocate the following resources in scenarios in which they are scarce: human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccinations, mammograms, and in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatments. Additional questions focused on how fairness and cost-effectiveness factored into the allocation decisions of each group. Results indicated that Obs/Gyns were more efficient in their distribution of HPV vaccinations and mammograms than in their distribution of IVF treatments. More efficient responding was associated with placing less emphasis on fairness in decision making. This study demonstrates the differences that exist in the emphasis that physicians place on medical evidence, cost, outcomes, and perceptions of fair (equal) allocation when faced with different costs and health impacts.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathobgyn_pp/107
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record