Anatomic outcomes of vaginal mesh procedure (Prolift) compared with uterosacral ligament suspension and abdominal sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: a Fellows' Pelvic Research Network study
Name:
Publisher version
View Source
Access full-text PDFOpen Access
View Source
Check access options
Check access options
Authors
Sanses, Tatiana V. D.Shahryarinejad, Azin
Molden, Stephanie
Hoskey, Kay A.
Abbasy, Shameem
Patterson, Danielle
Saks, Emily K.
Weber Lebrun, Emily Elise
Gamble, Tondalaya L.
King, Virginia G.
Nguyen, Aimee L.
Abed, Husam
Young, Stephen B.
UMass Chan Affiliations
Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyDocument Type
Journal ArticlePublication Date
2009-11-01Keywords
AgedFemale
Gynecologic Surgical Procedures
Humans
Middle Aged
Pelvic Organ Prolapse
Retrospective Studies
*Suburethral Slings
*Surgical Mesh
Treatment Outcome
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to compare apical support anatomic outcomes following vaginal mesh procedure (VMP) (Prolift) to uterosacral ligament suspension (USLS) and abdominal sacrocolpopexy (ASC). STUDY DESIGN: This multicenter, retrospective chart review compared apical anatomic success (stage 0 or 1 based on point C or D of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification), level of vaginal apex (point C or D) 3-6 months after prolapse repair at 10 US centers between 2004 and 2007. RESULTS: VMP, USLS, and ASC were performed for 206, 231, and 305 subjects respectively. There was no difference in apical success after VMP (98.8%) compared with USLS (99.1%) or ASC (99.3%) (both P = 1.00) 3-6 months after surgery. The average elevation of the vaginal apex was lower after VMP (-6.9 cm) than USLS (-8.05 cm) and ASC (-8.5 cm) (both P < .001) CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing VMP have similar apical success compared with USLS and ASC despite lower vaginal apex 3-6 month after surgery.Source
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Nov;201(5):519.e1-8. Epub 2009 Aug 28. Link to article on publisher's siteDOI
10.1016/j.ajog.2009.07.004Permanent Link to this Item
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/42765PubMed ID
19716533Related Resources
Link to Article in PubMedae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/j.ajog.2009.07.004