Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBarlow, Erin
dc.contributor.authorAggarwal, Anjali
dc.contributor.authorJohnstone, Joley
dc.contributor.authorAllen, Lisa
dc.contributor.authorKives, Sari
dc.contributor.authorOrnstein, Melanie
dc.contributor.authorSpitzer, Rachel F.
dc.contributor.authorCaccia, Nicolette
dc.date2022-08-11T08:10:06.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T16:55:42Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T16:55:42Z
dc.date.issued2012-02-01
dc.date.submitted2016-01-20
dc.identifier.citationPaediatr Child Health. 2012 Feb;17(2):e12-5.
dc.identifier.issn1205-7088 (Linking)
dc.identifier.pmid23372404
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/42766
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: Paediatric and adolescent gynecology (PAG) is an evolving subspecialty, with patients often having to travel large distances to access care. The goal of the present study was to assess whether Telehealth (TH) would be appropriate for PAG services in a tertiary care centre and to determine patient/family interest. METHODS: The present study was a prospective observational study of patients who attended PAG clinics over the course of one year. Patient data collected on each visit included postal code, diagnosis, availability of a local hospital with TH, patient appropriateness for TH and patient/family reasons for accepting TH. Visits were stratified by diagnosis to determine if certain conditions were more amenable to TH. RESULTS: From the total visits through the year (July 15, 2008 to July 15, 2009), 1541 (79.6%) patients were approached for participation; 8 (0.5%) declined. The final sample size was 1533 patient visits. Four hundred sixty-nine visits (30.6%) were potentially appropriate for TH based on geography. According to clinic physicians, only 51 of these 469 visits (10.9%) were appropriate for TH. The main reasons for being inappropriate were the need for physical examination (n=238, 57.0%), imaging (n=57, 13.6%), or issues regarding sexuality/privacy (n=45, 10.8%). Of the 51 appropriate visits, 28 patients/families (55.0%) expressed interest in TH. Of those not interested in TH, the main reasons included the desire for a face-to-face encounter and the need to coordinate with other health care appointments. CONCLUSION: Of the patient visits considered for TH (based on the fact that patients lived a considerable distance from the hospital), 10.9% were deemed appropriate for TH by the PAG team, but 45.0% of families/patients in this group said they would prefer a traditional clinic visit. Currently, TH appears to be appropriate for only a small subset of patients/families.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=23372404&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a>
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3299360/
dc.subjectAdolescent gynecology
dc.subjectPaediatric gynecology
dc.subjectTelehealth
dc.subjectTelemedicine
dc.subjectFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications
dc.subjectHealth Information Technology
dc.subjectMaternal and Child Health
dc.subjectObstetrics and Gynecology
dc.subjectWomen's Health
dc.titleCan paediatric and adolescent gynecological care be delivered via Telehealth
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitlePaediatrics and child health
dc.source.volume17
dc.source.issue2
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/obgyn_pp/120
dc.identifier.contextkey8028989
html.description.abstract<p>OBJECTIVE: Paediatric and adolescent gynecology (PAG) is an evolving subspecialty, with patients often having to travel large distances to access care. The goal of the present study was to assess whether Telehealth (TH) would be appropriate for PAG services in a tertiary care centre and to determine patient/family interest.</p> <p>METHODS: The present study was a prospective observational study of patients who attended PAG clinics over the course of one year. Patient data collected on each visit included postal code, diagnosis, availability of a local hospital with TH, patient appropriateness for TH and patient/family reasons for accepting TH. Visits were stratified by diagnosis to determine if certain conditions were more amenable to TH.</p> <p>RESULTS: From the total visits through the year (July 15, 2008 to July 15, 2009), 1541 (79.6%) patients were approached for participation; 8 (0.5%) declined. The final sample size was 1533 patient visits. Four hundred sixty-nine visits (30.6%) were potentially appropriate for TH based on geography. According to clinic physicians, only 51 of these 469 visits (10.9%) were appropriate for TH. The main reasons for being inappropriate were the need for physical examination (n=238, 57.0%), imaging (n=57, 13.6%), or issues regarding sexuality/privacy (n=45, 10.8%). Of the 51 appropriate visits, 28 patients/families (55.0%) expressed interest in TH. Of those not interested in TH, the main reasons included the desire for a face-to-face encounter and the need to coordinate with other health care appointments.</p> <p>CONCLUSION: Of the patient visits considered for TH (based on the fact that patients lived a considerable distance from the hospital), 10.9% were deemed appropriate for TH by the PAG team, but 45.0% of families/patients in this group said they would prefer a traditional clinic visit. Currently, TH appears to be appropriate for only a small subset of patients/families.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathobgyn_pp/120
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology
dc.source.pagese12-5


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record