Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMagee, B. Dale
dc.contributor.authorLeung, Katherine G.
dc.contributor.authorMoore Simas, Tiffany A.
dc.date2022-08-11T08:10:06.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T16:55:43Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T16:55:43Z
dc.date.issued2016-12-01
dc.date.submitted2016-12-19
dc.identifier.doi10.13028/6at7-gv62
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/42769
dc.description<p>This is an unpublished manuscript reporting on a study about point of service reminders for the HPV vaccine.</p>
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Our objective is to assess HPV vaccine series completion rates, whether on-screen Point of Service reminders (POS) make a difference, and missed opportunities for reminders to have an effect. Methods: Retrospective, claims-based study of females aged 9-26 receiving an initial dose of HPV vaccine during 2 periods: before (period 1) and after (period 2) implementation of a POS reminder system in 1(“Change Group”) of 2 physician groups using EHRs for both periods. Completion rates, and missed opportunities during eligible periods were calculated for those with continuous enrollment in the health plan investigated. Results: Completion rates within 1 year of the 1st dose were Period 1: 47% Change Group vs. 46% Control Group (p=0.847). Period 2: 50% Change group vs. 57% Control Group (p=0.158). No significant improvement occurred between the 2 periods in either group. Differences in 1 year completion rates by specialty of initiating provider or age group (≥18) were not significant. During period 2, among those with continuous insurance plan enrollment in the Change Group, 43 patients received 1 dose and 46 received 2 doses. Of those receiving 1 dose, 30 (70%) had a visit to the same group within an eligible time period (median # visits: 2, range 1-20); of those completing 2 doses, 4 (9%) had a visit to the same group within an eligible period (median # visits: 1, range: 1-3). Among those receiving 1 dose, 25 (58%) had a visit to the same group and same specialty as the initial dose (median # visits: 1, range 1-8); for those having received 2 doses, 3 (6%) had a subsequent visit to same group and specialty (median # visits: 1, range 1-3). Conclusion: POS reminder systems was not associated with improved completion rates. POS reminders are limited by infrequent visits among non-completers in an eligible period.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.rightsCopyright The Authors. This manuscript is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectHuman Papillomavirus
dc.subjectHPV
dc.subjectvaccine
dc.subjectpoint of service
dc.subjectPOS
dc.subjectcompletion rates
dc.subjectreminders
dc.subjectGardasil
dc.subjectCervarix
dc.subjectCommunity Health and Preventive Medicine
dc.subjectFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications
dc.subjectHealth Services Administration
dc.subjectObstetrics and Gynecology
dc.subjectPublic Health Education and Promotion
dc.subjectWomen's Health
dc.titleHPV Vaccine Reminders at the Point of Service: Efficacy and Missed Opportunities. A Claims Based Study within One Health Plan
dc.typePreprint
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1123&amp;context=obgyn_pp&amp;unstamped=1
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/obgyn_pp/124
dc.legacy.embargo2016-12-14T00:00:00-08:00
dc.identifier.contextkey9486815
refterms.dateFOA2022-08-26T06:23:08Z
html.description.abstract<p>Introduction: Our objective is to assess HPV vaccine series completion rates, whether on-screen Point of Service reminders (POS) make a difference, and missed opportunities for reminders to have an effect.</p> <p>Methods: Retrospective, claims-based study of females aged 9-26 receiving an initial dose of HPV vaccine during 2 periods: before (period 1) and after (period 2) implementation of a POS reminder system in 1(“Change Group”) of 2 physician groups using EHRs for both periods. Completion rates, and missed opportunities during eligible periods were calculated for those with continuous enrollment in the health plan investigated.</p> <p>Results: Completion rates within 1 year of the 1<sup>st</sup> dose were Period 1: 47% Change Group vs. 46% Control Group (p=0.847). Period 2: 50% Change group vs. 57% Control Group (p=0.158). No significant improvement occurred between the 2 periods in either group. Differences in 1 year completion rates by specialty of initiating provider or age group (≥18) were not significant.</p> <p>During period 2, among those with continuous insurance plan enrollment in the Change Group, 43 patients received 1 dose and 46 received 2 doses. Of those receiving 1 dose, 30 (70%) had a visit to the same group within an eligible time period (median # visits: 2, range 1-20); of those completing 2 doses, 4 (9%) had a visit to the same group within an eligible period (median # visits: 1, range: 1-3). Among those receiving 1 dose, 25 (58%) had a visit to the same group and same specialty as the initial dose (median # visits: 1, range 1-8); for those having received 2 doses, 3 (6%) had a subsequent visit to same group and specialty (median # visits: 1, range 1-3).</p> <p>Conclusion: POS reminder systems was not associated with improved completion rates. POS reminders are limited by infrequent visits among non-completers in an eligible period.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathobgyn_pp/124
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Gardasil_Reminder_Paper_eSchol ...
Size:
338.7Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Copyright The Authors. This manuscript is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Copyright The Authors. This manuscript is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.