Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKandadai, Padma
dc.contributor.authorMcvay, Samantha
dc.contributor.authorLarrieux, Jean-Robert
dc.contributor.authorO'Dell, Katherine K.
dc.date2022-08-11T08:10:06.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T16:55:47Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T16:55:47Z
dc.date.issued2016-11-01
dc.date.submitted2017-08-11
dc.identifier.citationFemale Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2016 Nov/Dec;22(6):491-496. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000000322">Link to article on publisher's site</a>
dc.identifier.issn2151-8378 (Linking)
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/SPV.0000000000000322
dc.identifier.pmid27661211
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/42785
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine factors associated with perceived comfort with pessary management among obstetrics and gynecology (OB/GYN) residents in the United States. METHODS: A 31-item anonymous electronic survey regarding experience with, attitudes toward, and comfort with pessary management was distributed to US OB/GYN residents in all postgraduate years (PGYs). Demographic and program-specific data on pessary education were collected. Descriptive statistical analyses were performed. Single-predictor logistic regression analysis, followed by analysis of a multivariable model that included significant single predictors, was performed to determine factors associated with residents' perception of comfort. Results were stratified for junior (PGYs 1, 2), senior (PGYs 3, 4), and chief (PGY4) residents. RESULTS: Four hundred seventy-eight completed surveys were returned and analyzed. Mean age of respondents was 29.5 (+/-2.56) years. Training levels were distributed evenly (PGY1, 25%; PGY2, 28%; PGY3, 25%; PGY4, 22%). Twenty-eight percent had a urogynecology fellowship in the department. Factors associated with comfort were similar for all training levels and included working with advanced practitioners, a formal urogynecology rotation, experience with pessary fitting, and receiving formal pessary-specific didactics (P < 0.001). PGY4s also benefitted from a formal urogynecology rotation. Factors that did not improve comfort were having a urogynecology fellowship and receiving general didactics on prolapse and incontinence. CONCLUSIONS: Gaining outpatient experience, especially with pessary fitting, along with formal didactics specific to pessary fitting and management may improve resident' confidence with pessary use.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=27661211&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a>
dc.relation.urlhttps://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000000322
dc.subjectFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications
dc.subjectMaternal and Child Health
dc.subjectMedical Education
dc.subjectObstetrics and Gynecology
dc.subjectWomen's Health
dc.titleKnowledge and Comfort With Pessary Use: A Survey of US Obstetrics and Gynecology Residents
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleFemale pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery
dc.source.volume22
dc.source.issue6
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/obgyn_pp/140
dc.identifier.contextkey10586760
html.description.abstract<p>OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine factors associated with perceived comfort with pessary management among obstetrics and gynecology (OB/GYN) residents in the United States.</p> <p>METHODS: A 31-item anonymous electronic survey regarding experience with, attitudes toward, and comfort with pessary management was distributed to US OB/GYN residents in all postgraduate years (PGYs). Demographic and program-specific data on pessary education were collected. Descriptive statistical analyses were performed. Single-predictor logistic regression analysis, followed by analysis of a multivariable model that included significant single predictors, was performed to determine factors associated with residents' perception of comfort. Results were stratified for junior (PGYs 1, 2), senior (PGYs 3, 4), and chief (PGY4) residents.</p> <p>RESULTS: Four hundred seventy-eight completed surveys were returned and analyzed. Mean age of respondents was 29.5 (+/-2.56) years. Training levels were distributed evenly (PGY1, 25%; PGY2, 28%; PGY3, 25%; PGY4, 22%). Twenty-eight percent had a urogynecology fellowship in the department. Factors associated with comfort were similar for all training levels and included working with advanced practitioners, a formal urogynecology rotation, experience with pessary fitting, and receiving formal pessary-specific didactics (P < 0.001). PGY4s also benefitted from a formal urogynecology rotation. Factors that did not improve comfort were having a urogynecology fellowship and receiving general didactics on prolapse and incontinence.</p> <p>CONCLUSIONS: Gaining outpatient experience, especially with pessary fitting, along with formal didactics specific to pessary fitting and management may improve resident' confidence with pessary use.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathobgyn_pp/140
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology
dc.source.pages491-496


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record