We are upgrading the repository! A content freeze is in effect until December 6, 2024. New submissions or changes to existing items will not be allowed during this period. All content already published will remain publicly available for searching and downloading. Updates will be posted in the Website Upgrade 2024 FAQ in the sidebar Help menu. Reach out to escholarship@umassmed.edu with any questions.
UMass Chan Affiliations
Department of Orthopedics and Physical RehabilitationDocument Type
Journal ArticlePublication Date
2012-06-01Keywords
AdultAged
Aged, 80 and over
Bone Morphogenetic Protein 2
Cervical Vertebrae
Combined Modality Therapy
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Pseudarthrosis
Recombinant Proteins
Retrospective Studies
Spinal Fractures
Spinal Fusion
Treatment Outcome
Orthopedics
Rehabilitation and Therapy
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Posterior cervical decompression and fusion can be performed for various spinal conditions. Previous rates of pseudoarthrosis have been reported in up to 38% of patients. The use of bone morphogenic protein (BMP) has been approved for use in certain anterior lumbar interbody fusion techniques to decrease the incidence of pseudoarthrosis. Bone morphogenic protein in the anterior cervical spine carries a potential increased risk of airway complications; however, few data exist on the safety and efficacy of BMP in the posterior cervical spine. The purpose of this study was to evaluate fusion success, safety, and heterotopic bone formation using BMP in posterior cervical fusion.Twenty-nine patients who received posterior cervical fusion with BMP were followed for a minimum of 12 months. Computed tomography scans were obtained at a minimum of 12 months postoperatively to evaluate for solid arthrodesis and the presence of heterotopic bone formation. Patients' demographic data and adverse events were evaluated. All patients underwent posterior cervical decompression and instrumented fusion of at least 1 level between 2006 and 2008. Of 37 patients eligible for the study, 29 agreed to participate. Three (10.3%) of 29 patients developed pseudoarthrosis, as found on computed tomography scan. None of these went on to further surgery. No evidence existed of heterotopic bone formation outside of the lateral masses or bone growth over the spinal canal or neuroforamen. No adverse events were related to the use of BMP in this series of posterior cervical fusions. Bone morphogenic protein can be used safely in posterior cervical spine fusion, but additional larger studies are recommended. Even with the use of bone morphogenic protein, the possibility of pseudoarthrosis exists.Source
Orthopedics. 2012 Jun;35(6):e895-8. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20120525-30. Link to article on publisher's siteDOI
10.3928/01477447-20120525-30Permanent Link to this Item
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/42938PubMed ID
22691663Related Resources
Link to Article in PubMedae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.3928/01477447-20120525-30