Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCurtis, Jeffrey R.
dc.contributor.authorShan, Ying
dc.contributor.authorHarrold, Leslie R.
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Jie
dc.contributor.authorGreenberg, Jeffrey D.
dc.contributor.authorReed, George W.
dc.date2022-08-11T08:10:08.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T16:56:35Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T16:56:35Z
dc.date.issued2013-10-01
dc.date.submitted2014-03-24
dc.identifier.citation<p>Curtis, J. R., Shan, Y., Harrold, L., Zhang, J., Greenberg, J. D. and Reed, G. W. (2013), Patient Perspectives on Achieving Treat-to-Target Goals: A Critical Examination of Patient-Reported Outcomes. Arthritis Care Res, 65: 1707–1712. doi: 10.1002/acr.22048. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acr.22048" target="_blank"> Link to article on publisher's site</a></p>
dc.identifier.issn2151-464X (Linking)
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/acr.22048
dc.identifier.pmid23740824
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/42961
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: Treat-to-target (T2T) recommendations suggest that rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients should strive for remission or low disease activity (LDA). However, it is unclear whether patients experiencing a good response to biologic agents might experience further improvement in patient-reported outcomes (PROs) if they subsequently achieve a lower disease activity state, particularly the T2T goals of LDA or remission. METHODS: Using the Consortium of Rheumatology Researchers of North America database, we identified RA patients initiating biologic agents. We restricted the analysis to patients with improvement (Clinical Disease Activity Index [CDAI] improvement of >/=10 units) at 3-6 months (baseline visit; n = 1,368) with a followup visit approximately 9 months later (n = 984). Patients in CDAI remission or with a worsened disease activity category were excluded, leaving 562 eligible patients. PROs (global assessment, pain, and fatigue by 0-10 visual analog scales and disability by the modified Health Assessment Questionnaire [M-HAQ]) were examined at these 2 visits. Mean change in PROs compared achievement of a lower disease activity category versus staying in the same disease activity category, adjusting for potential confounders. RESULTS: Patients who achieved a lower disease activity category (40% of the eligible cohort, 86% of these achieving LDA or remission) had significantly better improvement in patient pain (-14.9; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] -18.4, -11.6), patient global (-17.5; 95% CI -20.8, -14.3), fatigue (-8.5; 95% CI -15.8, -1.3), and M-HAQ score (-0.13; 95% CI -0.18, -0.08) compared to patients who stayed in the same disease activity category. However, even for patients improving, fewer than half exceeded the minimum clinically important difference for each PRO. CONCLUSION: Achievement of a lower disease activity disease state, especially T2T goals, was associated with further improvement in PROs, albeit modest in magnitude.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=23740824&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a>
dc.relation.urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acr.22048
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectAged
dc.subjectAntirheumatic Agents
dc.subjectArthritis, Rheumatoid
dc.subjectBiological Products
dc.subjectDisability Evaluation
dc.subjectDisease Progression
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subject*Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectLeast-Squares Analysis
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectMiddle Aged
dc.subjectMultivariate Analysis
dc.subjectPain Measurement
dc.subjectPatients
dc.subject*Perception
dc.subjectPredictive Value of Tests
dc.subjectRemission Induction
dc.subject*Self Report
dc.subjectSeverity of Illness Index
dc.subjectTime Factors
dc.subjectTreatment Outcome
dc.subjectMusculoskeletal Diseases
dc.subjectRheumatology
dc.titlePatient perspectives on achieving treat-to-target goals: a critical examination of patient-reported outcomes
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleArthritis care and research
dc.source.volume65
dc.source.issue10
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/ortho_pp/164
dc.identifier.contextkey5374664
html.description.abstract<p>OBJECTIVE: Treat-to-target (T2T) recommendations suggest that rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients should strive for remission or low disease activity (LDA). However, it is unclear whether patients experiencing a good response to biologic agents might experience further improvement in patient-reported outcomes (PROs) if they subsequently achieve a lower disease activity state, particularly the T2T goals of LDA or remission.</p> <p>METHODS: Using the Consortium of Rheumatology Researchers of North America database, we identified RA patients initiating biologic agents. We restricted the analysis to patients with improvement (Clinical Disease Activity Index [CDAI] improvement of >/=10 units) at 3-6 months (baseline visit; n = 1,368) with a followup visit approximately 9 months later (n = 984). Patients in CDAI remission or with a worsened disease activity category were excluded, leaving 562 eligible patients. PROs (global assessment, pain, and fatigue by 0-10 visual analog scales and disability by the modified Health Assessment Questionnaire [M-HAQ]) were examined at these 2 visits. Mean change in PROs compared achievement of a lower disease activity category versus staying in the same disease activity category, adjusting for potential confounders.</p> <p>RESULTS: Patients who achieved a lower disease activity category (40% of the eligible cohort, 86% of these achieving LDA or remission) had significantly better improvement in patient pain (-14.9; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] -18.4, -11.6), patient global (-17.5; 95% CI -20.8, -14.3), fatigue (-8.5; 95% CI -15.8, -1.3), and M-HAQ score (-0.13; 95% CI -0.18, -0.08) compared to patients who stayed in the same disease activity category. However, even for patients improving, fewer than half exceeded the minimum clinically important difference for each PRO.</p> <p>CONCLUSION: Achievement of a lower disease activity disease state, especially T2T goals, was associated with further improvement in PROs, albeit modest in magnitude.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathortho_pp/164
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Medicine, Division of Preventive and Behavioral Medicine
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Orthopedics and Physical Rehabilitation
dc.source.pages1707-12


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record