Patient perspectives on achieving treat-to-target goals: a critical examination of patient-reported outcomes
| dc.contributor.author | Curtis, Jeffrey R. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Shan, Ying | |
| dc.contributor.author | Harrold, Leslie R. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Zhang, Jie | |
| dc.contributor.author | Greenberg, Jeffrey D. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Reed, George W. | |
| dc.date | 2022-08-11T08:10:08.000 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-08-23T16:56:35Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2022-08-23T16:56:35Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2013-10-01 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2014-03-24 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | <p>Curtis, J. R., Shan, Y., Harrold, L., Zhang, J., Greenberg, J. D. and Reed, G. W. (2013), Patient Perspectives on Achieving Treat-to-Target Goals: A Critical Examination of Patient-Reported Outcomes. Arthritis Care Res, 65: 1707–1712. doi: 10.1002/acr.22048. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acr.22048" target="_blank"> Link to article on publisher's site</a></p> | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2151-464X (Linking) | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1002/acr.22048 | |
| dc.identifier.pmid | 23740824 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/42961 | |
| dc.description.abstract | OBJECTIVE: Treat-to-target (T2T) recommendations suggest that rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients should strive for remission or low disease activity (LDA). However, it is unclear whether patients experiencing a good response to biologic agents might experience further improvement in patient-reported outcomes (PROs) if they subsequently achieve a lower disease activity state, particularly the T2T goals of LDA or remission. METHODS: Using the Consortium of Rheumatology Researchers of North America database, we identified RA patients initiating biologic agents. We restricted the analysis to patients with improvement (Clinical Disease Activity Index [CDAI] improvement of >/=10 units) at 3-6 months (baseline visit; n = 1,368) with a followup visit approximately 9 months later (n = 984). Patients in CDAI remission or with a worsened disease activity category were excluded, leaving 562 eligible patients. PROs (global assessment, pain, and fatigue by 0-10 visual analog scales and disability by the modified Health Assessment Questionnaire [M-HAQ]) were examined at these 2 visits. Mean change in PROs compared achievement of a lower disease activity category versus staying in the same disease activity category, adjusting for potential confounders. RESULTS: Patients who achieved a lower disease activity category (40% of the eligible cohort, 86% of these achieving LDA or remission) had significantly better improvement in patient pain (-14.9; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] -18.4, -11.6), patient global (-17.5; 95% CI -20.8, -14.3), fatigue (-8.5; 95% CI -15.8, -1.3), and M-HAQ score (-0.13; 95% CI -0.18, -0.08) compared to patients who stayed in the same disease activity category. However, even for patients improving, fewer than half exceeded the minimum clinically important difference for each PRO. CONCLUSION: Achievement of a lower disease activity disease state, especially T2T goals, was associated with further improvement in PROs, albeit modest in magnitude. | |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | |
| dc.relation | <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=23740824&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a> | |
| dc.relation.url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acr.22048 | |
| dc.subject | Adult | |
| dc.subject | Aged | |
| dc.subject | Antirheumatic Agents | |
| dc.subject | Arthritis, Rheumatoid | |
| dc.subject | Biological Products | |
| dc.subject | Disability Evaluation | |
| dc.subject | Disease Progression | |
| dc.subject | Female | |
| dc.subject | *Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice | |
| dc.subject | Humans | |
| dc.subject | Least-Squares Analysis | |
| dc.subject | Male | |
| dc.subject | Middle Aged | |
| dc.subject | Multivariate Analysis | |
| dc.subject | Pain Measurement | |
| dc.subject | Patients | |
| dc.subject | *Perception | |
| dc.subject | Predictive Value of Tests | |
| dc.subject | Remission Induction | |
| dc.subject | *Self Report | |
| dc.subject | Severity of Illness Index | |
| dc.subject | Time Factors | |
| dc.subject | Treatment Outcome | |
| dc.subject | Musculoskeletal Diseases | |
| dc.subject | Rheumatology | |
| dc.title | Patient perspectives on achieving treat-to-target goals: a critical examination of patient-reported outcomes | |
| dc.type | Journal Article | |
| dc.source.journaltitle | Arthritis care and research | |
| dc.source.volume | 65 | |
| dc.source.issue | 10 | |
| dc.identifier.legacycoverpage | https://escholarship.umassmed.edu/ortho_pp/164 | |
| dc.identifier.contextkey | 5374664 | |
| html.description.abstract | <p>OBJECTIVE: Treat-to-target (T2T) recommendations suggest that rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients should strive for remission or low disease activity (LDA). However, it is unclear whether patients experiencing a good response to biologic agents might experience further improvement in patient-reported outcomes (PROs) if they subsequently achieve a lower disease activity state, particularly the T2T goals of LDA or remission.</p> <p>METHODS: Using the Consortium of Rheumatology Researchers of North America database, we identified RA patients initiating biologic agents. We restricted the analysis to patients with improvement (Clinical Disease Activity Index [CDAI] improvement of >/=10 units) at 3-6 months (baseline visit; n = 1,368) with a followup visit approximately 9 months later (n = 984). Patients in CDAI remission or with a worsened disease activity category were excluded, leaving 562 eligible patients. PROs (global assessment, pain, and fatigue by 0-10 visual analog scales and disability by the modified Health Assessment Questionnaire [M-HAQ]) were examined at these 2 visits. Mean change in PROs compared achievement of a lower disease activity category versus staying in the same disease activity category, adjusting for potential confounders.</p> <p>RESULTS: Patients who achieved a lower disease activity category (40% of the eligible cohort, 86% of these achieving LDA or remission) had significantly better improvement in patient pain (-14.9; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] -18.4, -11.6), patient global (-17.5; 95% CI -20.8, -14.3), fatigue (-8.5; 95% CI -15.8, -1.3), and M-HAQ score (-0.13; 95% CI -0.18, -0.08) compared to patients who stayed in the same disease activity category. However, even for patients improving, fewer than half exceeded the minimum clinically important difference for each PRO.</p> <p>CONCLUSION: Achievement of a lower disease activity disease state, especially T2T goals, was associated with further improvement in PROs, albeit modest in magnitude.</p> | |
| dc.identifier.submissionpath | ortho_pp/164 | |
| dc.contributor.department | Department of Medicine, Division of Preventive and Behavioral Medicine | |
| dc.contributor.department | Department of Orthopedics and Physical Rehabilitation | |
| dc.source.pages | 1707-12 |