We are upgrading the repository! A content freeze is in effect until December 6, 2024. New submissions or changes to existing items will not be allowed during this period. All content already published will remain publicly available for searching and downloading. Updates will be posted in the Website Upgrade 2024 FAQ in the sidebar Help menu. Reach out to escholarship@umassmed.edu with any questions.

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLee, Joon Y.
dc.contributor.authorNassr, Ahmad
dc.contributor.authorEck, Jason C.
dc.contributor.authorVaccaro, Alexander R.
dc.date2022-08-11T08:10:08.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T16:56:48Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T16:56:48Z
dc.date.issued2009-05-24
dc.date.submitted2011-05-26
dc.identifier.citationSpine J. 2009 May;9(5):418-23. Epub 2009 Feb 23. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2009.01.005">Link to article on publisher's site</a>
dc.identifier.issn1529-9430 (Linking)
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.spinee.2009.01.005
dc.identifier.pmid19233734
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/43008
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND CONTEXT: Cervical spine dislocations represent an area of great controversy among spine surgeons. PURPOSE: The purpose of this review is to present the specific areas of controversy and to provide a review of the literature. STUDY DESIGN: A case of cervical spine dislocation is presented to illustrate the major controversies related to the treatment of cervical spine dislocations. METHODS: A review of the literature is presented regarding the major controversial aspects of the treatment of cervical spine dislocations. RESULTS: The major areas of controversy include the choice of imaging, closed versus open reduction and surgical approach. CONCLUSIONS: Guidelines for the management of cervical spine dislocations are presented based on evidence-based medicine.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=19233734&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a>
dc.relation.urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2009.01.005
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectCervical Vertebrae
dc.subjectDiagnostic Imaging
dc.subjectDislocations
dc.subjectEvidence-Based Medicine
dc.subjectFracture Fixation
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectPractice Guidelines as Topic
dc.subjectSpinal Cord Injuries
dc.subjectOrthopedics
dc.subjectRehabilitation and Therapy
dc.titleControversies in the treatment of cervical spine dislocations
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleThe spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society
dc.source.volume9
dc.source.issue5
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/ortho_pp/21
dc.identifier.contextkey2032260
html.description.abstract<p>BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Cervical spine dislocations represent an area of great controversy among spine surgeons.</p> <p>PURPOSE: The purpose of this review is to present the specific areas of controversy and to provide a review of the literature.</p> <p>STUDY DESIGN: A case of cervical spine dislocation is presented to illustrate the major controversies related to the treatment of cervical spine dislocations.</p> <p>METHODS: A review of the literature is presented regarding the major controversial aspects of the treatment of cervical spine dislocations.</p> <p>RESULTS: The major areas of controversy include the choice of imaging, closed versus open reduction and surgical approach.</p> <p>CONCLUSIONS: Guidelines for the management of cervical spine dislocations are presented based on evidence-based medicine.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathortho_pp/21
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Orthopedics and Physical Rehabilitation
dc.source.pages418-23


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Publisher version

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record