Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLee, Joon Y.
dc.contributor.authorNassr, Ahmad
dc.contributor.authorEck, Jason C.
dc.contributor.authorVaccaro, Alexander R.
dc.date2022-08-11T08:10:08.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T16:56:48Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T16:56:48Z
dc.date.issued2009-05-24
dc.date.submitted2011-05-26
dc.identifier.citationSpine J. 2009 May;9(5):418-23. Epub 2009 Feb 23. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2009.01.005">Link to article on publisher's site</a>
dc.identifier.issn1529-9430 (Linking)
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.spinee.2009.01.005
dc.identifier.pmid19233734
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/43008
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND CONTEXT: Cervical spine dislocations represent an area of great controversy among spine surgeons. PURPOSE: The purpose of this review is to present the specific areas of controversy and to provide a review of the literature. STUDY DESIGN: A case of cervical spine dislocation is presented to illustrate the major controversies related to the treatment of cervical spine dislocations. METHODS: A review of the literature is presented regarding the major controversial aspects of the treatment of cervical spine dislocations. RESULTS: The major areas of controversy include the choice of imaging, closed versus open reduction and surgical approach. CONCLUSIONS: Guidelines for the management of cervical spine dislocations are presented based on evidence-based medicine.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=19233734&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a>
dc.relation.urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2009.01.005
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectCervical Vertebrae
dc.subjectDiagnostic Imaging
dc.subjectDislocations
dc.subjectEvidence-Based Medicine
dc.subjectFracture Fixation
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectPractice Guidelines as Topic
dc.subjectSpinal Cord Injuries
dc.subjectOrthopedics
dc.subjectRehabilitation and Therapy
dc.titleControversies in the treatment of cervical spine dislocations
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleThe spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society
dc.source.volume9
dc.source.issue5
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/ortho_pp/21
dc.identifier.contextkey2032260
html.description.abstract<p>BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Cervical spine dislocations represent an area of great controversy among spine surgeons.</p> <p>PURPOSE: The purpose of this review is to present the specific areas of controversy and to provide a review of the literature.</p> <p>STUDY DESIGN: A case of cervical spine dislocation is presented to illustrate the major controversies related to the treatment of cervical spine dislocations.</p> <p>METHODS: A review of the literature is presented regarding the major controversial aspects of the treatment of cervical spine dislocations.</p> <p>RESULTS: The major areas of controversy include the choice of imaging, closed versus open reduction and surgical approach.</p> <p>CONCLUSIONS: Guidelines for the management of cervical spine dislocations are presented based on evidence-based medicine.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathortho_pp/21
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Orthopedics and Physical Rehabilitation
dc.source.pages418-23


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Publisher version

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record