Controversies in the treatment of cervical spine dislocations
dc.contributor.author | Lee, Joon Y. | |
dc.contributor.author | Nassr, Ahmad | |
dc.contributor.author | Eck, Jason C. | |
dc.contributor.author | Vaccaro, Alexander R. | |
dc.date | 2022-08-11T08:10:08.000 | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-08-23T16:56:48Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-08-23T16:56:48Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2009-05-24 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2011-05-26 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Spine J. 2009 May;9(5):418-23. Epub 2009 Feb 23. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2009.01.005">Link to article on publisher's site</a> | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1529-9430 (Linking) | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.spinee.2009.01.005 | |
dc.identifier.pmid | 19233734 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/43008 | |
dc.description.abstract | BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Cervical spine dislocations represent an area of great controversy among spine surgeons. PURPOSE: The purpose of this review is to present the specific areas of controversy and to provide a review of the literature. STUDY DESIGN: A case of cervical spine dislocation is presented to illustrate the major controversies related to the treatment of cervical spine dislocations. METHODS: A review of the literature is presented regarding the major controversial aspects of the treatment of cervical spine dislocations. RESULTS: The major areas of controversy include the choice of imaging, closed versus open reduction and surgical approach. CONCLUSIONS: Guidelines for the management of cervical spine dislocations are presented based on evidence-based medicine. | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.relation | <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=19233734&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a> | |
dc.relation.url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2009.01.005 | |
dc.subject | Adult | |
dc.subject | Cervical Vertebrae | |
dc.subject | Diagnostic Imaging | |
dc.subject | Dislocations | |
dc.subject | Evidence-Based Medicine | |
dc.subject | Fracture Fixation | |
dc.subject | Humans | |
dc.subject | Male | |
dc.subject | Practice Guidelines as Topic | |
dc.subject | Spinal Cord Injuries | |
dc.subject | Orthopedics | |
dc.subject | Rehabilitation and Therapy | |
dc.title | Controversies in the treatment of cervical spine dislocations | |
dc.type | Journal Article | |
dc.source.journaltitle | The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society | |
dc.source.volume | 9 | |
dc.source.issue | 5 | |
dc.identifier.legacycoverpage | https://escholarship.umassmed.edu/ortho_pp/21 | |
dc.identifier.contextkey | 2032260 | |
html.description.abstract | <p>BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Cervical spine dislocations represent an area of great controversy among spine surgeons.</p> <p>PURPOSE: The purpose of this review is to present the specific areas of controversy and to provide a review of the literature.</p> <p>STUDY DESIGN: A case of cervical spine dislocation is presented to illustrate the major controversies related to the treatment of cervical spine dislocations.</p> <p>METHODS: A review of the literature is presented regarding the major controversial aspects of the treatment of cervical spine dislocations.</p> <p>RESULTS: The major areas of controversy include the choice of imaging, closed versus open reduction and surgical approach.</p> <p>CONCLUSIONS: Guidelines for the management of cervical spine dislocations are presented based on evidence-based medicine.</p> | |
dc.identifier.submissionpath | ortho_pp/21 | |
dc.contributor.department | Department of Orthopedics and Physical Rehabilitation | |
dc.source.pages | 418-23 |