The Chitranjan Ranawat Award: functional outcome after total knee replacement varies with patient attributes
UMass Chan Affiliations
Department of Medicine, Division of Preventive and Behavioral MedicineClinical and Population Health Research Program
Department of Orthopedics and Physical Rehabilitation
Document Type
Journal ArticlePublication Date
2008-11-01Keywords
AgedAged, 80 and over
Arthralgia
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee
Awards and Prizes
Body Mass Index
Disability Evaluation
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Male
Orthopedics
Osteoarthritis, Knee
Pain Measurement
Range of Motion, Articular
Retrospective Studies
Societies, Medical
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Walking
Orthopedics
Rehabilitation and Therapy
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Total knee replacement effectively relieves arthritis pain but improvement in physical function varies. A clearer understanding of the patient attributes associated with differing levels of functional gain after TKR is critical to surgical decision making. We reviewed 8050 primary, unilateral TKR patients enrolled in a prospective registry between 2000 and 2005 who had complete data. We evaluated associations between 12-month function (SF12/PCS) and preoperative gender, age, BMI, emotional health (MCS), knee diagnosis, quadriceps strength, and physical function (PCS). More than 98% of patients reported pain relief (KS pain score). At 12 months, mean PCS gain was 13.6 points, but the distribution was bimodal. The mean gain in PCS in the 63% of patients with greater improvement was 21 (SD = 7), and 4.1 (SD = 7) in the remaining 37%. Increased likelihood of poor functional gain was associated with older age, body mass index (BMI) over 40, lower MCS, and poor quadriceps strength. While two-thirds of patients reported functional gain well above national average at 12 months post-TKR, 37% reported limited functional improvement. Further understanding of the patient attributes associated with limited improvement will guide the design of innovative strategies to improve functional outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, prognostic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.Source
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008 Nov;466(11):2597-604. Link to article on publisher's siteDOI
10.1007/s11999-008-0428-8Permanent Link to this Item
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/43022PubMed ID
18810570Related Resources
Link to Article in PubMedae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1007/s11999-008-0428-8