Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBlake, Diane R.
dc.contributor.authorLemay, Celeste A.
dc.contributor.authorGaydos, Charlotte A.
dc.contributor.authorQuinn, Thomas C.
dc.date2022-08-11T08:10:09.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T16:57:18Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T16:57:18Z
dc.date.issued2005-04-23
dc.date.submitted2011-11-30
dc.identifier.citationJ Adolesc Health. 2005 Apr;36(4):337-41. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2004.02.032">Link to article on publisher's site</a>
dc.identifier.issn1054-139X (Linking)
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jadohealth.2004.02.032
dc.identifier.pmid15780789
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/43109
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE: To re-evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of leukocyte esterase (LE) for screening adolescent and young adult males for Chlamydia trachomatis using a nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) as the gold standard. METHODS: This study was conducted at two Massachusetts Department of Youth Services sites and one Job Corps site. Recently admitted asymptomatic sexually active male youth aged 14 to 25 years (mean 16.6 years) were recruited between January 2001 and July 2003 (N = 1008). Participants provided first part voided urine specimens for testing with LE and Chlamydia NAAT. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value of urine LE for identification of Chlamydia infection were determined using NAAT as the gold standard. RESULTS: Fifty-seven (5.7%) participants were infected with Chlamydia as defined by a positive NAAT. Defining trace + as the LE cut point resulted in sensitivity and specificity of 57.9% and 78.3%, respectively. Defining 1+ as the cut point resulted in sensitivity and specificity of 47.4% and 96.1%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Urine leukocyte esterase is a moderately sensitive method to screen for Chlamydia. Nevertheless, a substantial proportion of infections are not detected with LE screening. When feasible, urine NAAT provides a much more sensitive and equally noninvasive method of detecting Chlamydia. However, if LE is used as an initial screen followed by NAAT confirmation of LE positive samples, we recommend using trace LE as the cut point for positive results.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=15780789&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a>
dc.relation.urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2004.02.032
dc.subjectAdolescent
dc.subjectAdolescent Behavior
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectCarboxylic Ester Hydrolases
dc.subjectChlamydia Infections
dc.subjectChlamydia trachomatis
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectMale
dc.subject*Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques
dc.subjectPredictive Value of Tests
dc.subjectReference Values
dc.subjectSensitivity and Specificity
dc.subjectSexual Behavior
dc.subjectPediatrics
dc.titlePerformance of urine leukocyte esterase in asymptomatic male youth: another look with nucleic acid amplification testing as the gold standard for Chlamydia detection
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleThe Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine
dc.source.volume36
dc.source.issue4
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/peds_adolescent/10
dc.identifier.contextkey2380667
html.description.abstract<p>PURPOSE: To re-evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of leukocyte esterase (LE) for screening adolescent and young adult males for Chlamydia trachomatis using a nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) as the gold standard.</p> <p>METHODS: This study was conducted at two Massachusetts Department of Youth Services sites and one Job Corps site. Recently admitted asymptomatic sexually active male youth aged 14 to 25 years (mean 16.6 years) were recruited between January 2001 and July 2003 (N = 1008). Participants provided first part voided urine specimens for testing with LE and Chlamydia NAAT. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value of urine LE for identification of Chlamydia infection were determined using NAAT as the gold standard.</p> <p>RESULTS: Fifty-seven (5.7%) participants were infected with Chlamydia as defined by a positive NAAT. Defining trace + as the LE cut point resulted in sensitivity and specificity of 57.9% and 78.3%, respectively. Defining 1+ as the cut point resulted in sensitivity and specificity of 47.4% and 96.1%, respectively.</p> <p>CONCLUSIONS: Urine leukocyte esterase is a moderately sensitive method to screen for Chlamydia. Nevertheless, a substantial proportion of infections are not detected with LE screening. When feasible, urine NAAT provides a much more sensitive and equally noninvasive method of detecting Chlamydia. However, if LE is used as an initial screen followed by NAAT confirmation of LE positive samples, we recommend using trace LE as the cut point for positive results.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathpeds_adolescent/10
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Pediatrics
dc.source.pages337-41


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Publisher version

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record