Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBlake, Diane R.
dc.contributor.authorLemay, Celeste A.
dc.contributor.authorKearney, Margaret H.
dc.contributor.authorMazor, Kathleen M.
dc.date2022-08-11T08:10:09.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T16:57:20Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T16:57:20Z
dc.date.issued2011-06-08
dc.date.submitted2011-11-30
dc.identifier.citationArch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2011 Jun;165(6):533-9. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archpediatrics.2011.87">Link to article on publisher's site</a>
dc.identifier.issn1072-4710 (Linking)
dc.identifier.doi10.1001/archpediatrics.2011.87
dc.identifier.pmid21646586
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/43119
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: To identify ways to improve adolescents' understanding of informed assent by exploring adolescent comprehension of concepts common to all clinical trials as well as those specific to a human immunodeficiency virus vaccine trial. DESIGN: Qualitative descriptive study. SETTING: Community-based organizations. PARTICIPANTS: Healthy adolescents aged 15 to 17 years in 8 focus groups. INTERVENTION: Focus groups were conducted using a semistructured interview guide. Digital recordings of the groups were transcribed verbatim. OUTCOME MEASURE: Textual data were categorized by 2 investigators using directed qualitative content analysis techniques. Major themes and subthemes were identified, and representative quotes were selected. RESULTS: The general research concepts that were most difficult for teens to understand were placebo and randomization. The most difficult vaccine trial concepts were how a vaccine works and that a vaccine is used for prevention rather than treatment. The most difficult human immunodeficiency virus vaccine-specific trial concept was that standard human immunodeficiency virus antibody tests might provide a false-positive result for participants receiving the test vaccine. Focus group participants wanted to be informed about adverse effects, trial procedures, and whether previous research had been performed before making a decision about trial participation. CONCLUSIONS: Many clinical trial concepts were difficult for teens to understand. Attention needs to be directed toward developing effective ways to explain these concepts to adolescents participating in future human immunodeficiency virus vaccine and other clinical trials.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=21646586&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a>
dc.relation.urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archpediatrics.2011.87
dc.subjectAdolescent
dc.subjectAge Factors
dc.subject*Clinical Trials as Topic
dc.subject*Comprehension
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectFocus Groups
dc.subjectHIV Infections
dc.subject*Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectInterviews as Topic
dc.subjectNeeds Assessment
dc.subject*Qualitative Research
dc.subjectRisk Factors
dc.subjectSensitivity and Specificity
dc.subjectUnited States
dc.subjectVaccination
dc.subjectPediatrics
dc.titleAdolescents' understanding of research concepts: a focus group study
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleArchives of pediatrics and adolescent medicine
dc.source.volume165
dc.source.issue6
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/peds_adolescent/21
dc.identifier.contextkey2380679
html.description.abstract<p>OBJECTIVE: To identify ways to improve adolescents' understanding of informed assent by exploring adolescent comprehension of concepts common to all clinical trials as well as those specific to a human immunodeficiency virus vaccine trial.</p> <p>DESIGN: Qualitative descriptive study.</p> <p>SETTING: Community-based organizations.</p> <p>PARTICIPANTS: Healthy adolescents aged 15 to 17 years in 8 focus groups.</p> <p>INTERVENTION: Focus groups were conducted using a semistructured interview guide. Digital recordings of the groups were transcribed verbatim.</p> <p>OUTCOME MEASURE: Textual data were categorized by 2 investigators using directed qualitative content analysis techniques. Major themes and subthemes were identified, and representative quotes were selected.</p> <p>RESULTS: The general research concepts that were most difficult for teens to understand were placebo and randomization. The most difficult vaccine trial concepts were how a vaccine works and that a vaccine is used for prevention rather than treatment. The most difficult human immunodeficiency virus vaccine-specific trial concept was that standard human immunodeficiency virus antibody tests might provide a false-positive result for participants receiving the test vaccine. Focus group participants wanted to be informed about adverse effects, trial procedures, and whether previous research had been performed before making a decision about trial participation.</p> <p>CONCLUSIONS: Many clinical trial concepts were difficult for teens to understand. Attention needs to be directed toward developing effective ways to explain these concepts to adolescents participating in future human immunodeficiency virus vaccine and other clinical trials.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathpeds_adolescent/21
dc.contributor.departmentMeyers Primary Care Institute
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Pediatrics
dc.source.pages533-9


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record