Authors
Perrin, James M.Knapp, Alixandra A.
Browning, Marsha F.
Comeau, Anne Marie
Green, Nancy S.
Lipstein, Ellen A.
Metterville, Danielle R.
Prosser, Lisa A.
Queally, Denise
Kemper, Alex R.
Document Type
Journal ArticlePublication Date
2010-03-16Keywords
*Evidence-Based Medicine*Expert Testimony
Health Plan Implementation
Humans
Infant, Newborn
*Neonatal Screening
Patient Advocacy
Rare Diseases
United States
Genetics and Genomics
Medical Genetics
Pediatrics
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
This article describes the background, development, and initial implementation of new procedures for the systematic review of key issues in newborn screening. Building on the work of other systematic review efforts, the Evidence Review Group described here has aimed to develop consistent and transparent strategies for evidence review. This process has helped to strengthen a complex analysis and decision system by providing balanced evidence, taking into account available high-quality data, expert opinion, and other levels of evidence, in a transparent manner. The methods developed and the identification of areas of missing data may also help investigators begin to standardize the clinical and laboratory data they collect pertaining to the newborn screening and diagnosis of rare disorders and their outcomes and focus future research efforts in the most needed areas.Source
Genet Med. 2010 Mar;12(3):131-4. Link to article on publisher's siteDOI
10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181d28eb1Permanent Link to this Item
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/43281PubMed ID
20154629Related Resources
Link to Article in PubMedae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181d28eb1