Clinical considerations with the use of antiplatelet therapy in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention
Authors
Braunwald, EugeneAngiolillo, Dominick J.
Bates, Eric
Berger, Peter B.
Bhatt, Deepak
Cannon, Christopher P.
Furman, Mark I.
Gurbel, Paul A.
Michelson, Alan D.
Peterson, Eric D.
Wiviott, Stephen D.
UMass Chan Affiliations
Department of PediatricsDocument Type
Journal ArticlePublication Date
2008-03-01Keywords
Angioplasty, Balloon, CoronaryBlood Platelets
Drug Administration Schedule
Drug Therapy, Combination
Guideline Adherence
Humans
Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors
Platelet Glycoprotein GPIIb-IIIa Complex
Practice Guidelines as Topic
Stents
Thrombosis
Ticlopidine
Treatment Outcome
Hematology
Oncology
Pediatrics
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Despite the proven benefits of using antiplatelet therapy in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), a number of key questions remain to be answered. In recent years, clopidogrel dosing strategies among such patients have evolved considerably, with newer approaches involving loading doses prior to PCI and increases in the time interval and loading dosage in an effort to overcome variable responsiveness/hyporesponsiveness to platelet inhibition. Further, the role of glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa antagonists in elective stenting continues to be defined, with recent evidence suggesting that most appropriate use of these agents is in high-risk patients with elevated troponin levels. There appears to be a relationship between the use of GP IIb/IIIa antagonists with clopidogrel loading and attenuation of early inflammatory and cardiac marker release. Strategies to minimize the chance of late stent thrombosis in patients who receive drug-eluting stents (DES) are also under intense investigation. Among some patients receiving sirolimus and paclitaxel DES, current standard long-term antiplatelet strategies may be insufficient. Patient nonadherence to treatment and premature discontinuation and underutilization of antiplatelet therapies by physicians remain important clinical problems with potentially dire consequences.Source
Clin Cardiol. 2008 Mar;31(3 Suppl 1):I28-35. doi 10.1002/clc.20359DOI
10.1002/clc.20359Permanent Link to this Item
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/43304PubMed ID
18481820Related Resources
Link to article in PubMedae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1002/clc.20359