Prasugrel compared with high loading- and maintenance-dose clopidogrel in patients with planned percutaneous coronary intervention: the Prasugrel in Comparison to Clopidogrel for Inhibition of Platelet Activation and Aggregation-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 44 trial
Authors
Wiviott, Stephen D.Trenk, Dietmar
Frelinger, Andrew L. III
O'Donoghue, Michelle
Neumann, Franz-Josef
Michelson, Alan D.
Angiolillo, Dominick J.
Hod, Hanoch
Montalescot, Gilles
Miller, Debra L.
Jakubowski, Joseph A.
Cairns, Richard
Murphy, Sabina A.
McCabe, Carolyn H.
Antman, Elliott M.
Braunwald, Eugene
UMass Chan Affiliations
Department of PediatricsDocument Type
Journal ArticlePublication Date
2007-12-18Keywords
AgedAngioplasty, Balloon, Coronary
Combined Modality Therapy
Cross-Over Studies
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Myocardial Infarction
Piperazines
Platelet Activation
Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors
Thiophenes
Thrombolytic Therapy
Ticlopidine
derivatives
Treatment Outcome
Hematology
Oncology
Pediatrics
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
BACKGROUND: The increasing use of higher-than-approved doses of clopidogrel in clinical practice is based in part on the desire for greater levels of inhibition of platelet aggregation (IPA). Prasugrel is a new thienopyridine that is more potent than standard-dose clopidogrel in healthy subjects and patients with stable coronary artery disease. The relative antiplatelet effects of prasugrel versus high-dose clopidogrel in percutaneous coronary intervention patients are unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: Prasugrel in Comparison to Clopidogrel for Inhibition of Platelet Activation and Aggregation-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 44 (PRINCIPLE-TIMI 44) was a randomized, double-blind, 2-phase crossover study of prasugrel compared with high-dose clopidogrel in patients undergoing cardiac catheterization for planned percutaneous coronary intervention. The primary end point of the loading-dose phase (prasugrel 60 mg versus clopidogrel 600 mg) was IPA with 20 mumol/L ADP at 6 hours. Patients with percutaneous coronary intervention entered the maintenance-dose phase, a 28-day crossover comparison of prasugrel 10 mg/d versus clopidogrel 150 mg/d with a primary end point of IPA after 14 days of either drug. In this study, 201 subjects were randomized. IPA at 6 hours was significantly higher in subjects receiving prasugrel (mean+/-SD, 74.8+/-13.0%) compared with clopidogrel (31.8+/-21.1%; Pandlt;0.0001). During the maintenance-dose phase, IPA with 20 mumol/L ADP was higher in subjects receiving prasugrel (61.3+/-17.8%) compared with clopidogrel (46.1+/-21.3%; Pandlt;0.0001). Results were consistent across all key secondary end points; significant differences emerged by 30 minutes and persisted across all time points. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients undergoing cardiac catheterization with planned percutaneous coronary intervention, loading with 60 mg prasugrel resulted in greater platelet inhibition than a 600-mg clopidogrel loading dose. Maintenance therapy with prasugrel 10 mg/d resulted in a greater antiplatelet effect than 150 mg/d clopidogrel.Source
Circulation. 2007 Dec 18;116(25):2923-32. Epub 2007 Dec 3. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.740324DOI
10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.740324Permanent Link to this Item
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/43413PubMed ID
18056526Related Resources
Link to article in PubMedae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.740324