Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWilliams, Mark R.
dc.contributor.authorWard, Denham S.
dc.contributor.authorLightdale, Jenifer R.
dc.date2022-08-11T08:10:12.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T16:59:21Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T16:59:21Z
dc.date.issued2017-03-01
dc.date.submitted2017-06-01
dc.identifier.citationAnesth Analg. 2017 Mar;124(3):821-830. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001566. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000001566">Link to article on publisher's site</a>
dc.identifier.issn0003-2999 (Linking)
dc.identifier.doi10.1213/ANE.0000000000001566
dc.identifier.pmid27622720
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/43565
dc.description<p>Full list of authors omitted for brevity. For full list see article.</p>
dc.description.abstractThe Sedation Consortium on Endpoints and Procedures for Treatment, Education, and Research, established by the Analgesic, Anesthetic, and Addiction Clinical Trial Translations, Innovations, Opportunities, and Networks public-private partnership with the US Food and Drug Administration, convened a meeting of sedation experts from a variety of clinical specialties and research backgrounds with the objective of developing recommendations for procedural sedation research. Four core outcome domains were recommended for consideration in sedation clinical trials: (1) safety, (2) efficacy, (3) patient-centered and/or family-centered outcomes, and (4) efficiency. This meeting identified core outcome measures within the efficacy and patient-centered and/or family-centered domains. Safety will be addressed in a subsequent meeting, and efficiency will not be addressed at this time. These measures encompass depth and levels of sedation, proceduralist and patient satisfaction, patient recall, and degree of pain experienced. Consistent use of the recommended outcome measures will facilitate the comprehensive reporting across sedation trials, along with meaningful comparisons among studies and interventions in systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=27622720&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a>
dc.relation.urlhttps://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000001566
dc.subjectAnesthesia and Analgesia
dc.subjectAnesthesiology
dc.titleEvaluating Patient-Centered Outcomes in Clinical Trials of Procedural Sedation, Part 1 Efficacy: Sedation Consortium on Endpoints and Procedures for Treatment, Education, and Research Recommendations
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleAnesthesia and analgesia
dc.source.volume124
dc.source.issue3
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/peds_pp/136
dc.identifier.contextkey10236419
html.description.abstract<p>The Sedation Consortium on Endpoints and Procedures for Treatment, Education, and Research, established by the Analgesic, Anesthetic, and Addiction Clinical Trial Translations, Innovations, Opportunities, and Networks public-private partnership with the US Food and Drug Administration, convened a meeting of sedation experts from a variety of clinical specialties and research backgrounds with the objective of developing recommendations for procedural sedation research. Four core outcome domains were recommended for consideration in sedation clinical trials: (1) safety, (2) efficacy, (3) patient-centered and/or family-centered outcomes, and (4) efficiency. This meeting identified core outcome measures within the efficacy and patient-centered and/or family-centered domains. Safety will be addressed in a subsequent meeting, and efficiency will not be addressed at this time. These measures encompass depth and levels of sedation, proceduralist and patient satisfaction, patient recall, and degree of pain experienced. Consistent use of the recommended outcome measures will facilitate the comprehensive reporting across sedation trials, along with meaningful comparisons among studies and interventions in systematic reviews and meta-analyses.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathpeds_pp/136
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology
dc.source.pages821-830


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record