Efficacy Outcome Measures for Pediatric Procedural Sedation Clinical Trials: An ACTTION Systematic Review
Authors
Williams, Mark R.Nayshtut, Michael
Hoefnagel, Amie
McKeown, Andrew
Carlson, Douglas W.
Cravero, Joseph
Lightdale, Jenifer R.
Mason, Keira P.
Wilson, Stephen
Turk, Dennis C.
Dworkin, Robert H.
Ward, Denham S.
UMass Chan Affiliations
Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric GastroentrologyDocument Type
Journal ArticlePublication Date
2017-09-14
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Objective evaluations comparing different techniques and approaches to pediatric procedural sedation studies have been limited by a lack of consistency among the outcome measures used in assessment. This study reviewed those existing measures, which have undergone psychometric analysis in a pediatric procedural sedation setting, to determine to what extent and in what circumstances their use is justified across the spectrum of procedures, age groups, and techniques. The results of our study suggest that a wide range of measures has been used to assess the efficacy and effectiveness of pediatric procedural sedation. Most lack the evidence of validity and reliability that is necessary to facilitate rigorous clinical trial design, as well as the evaluation of new drugs and devices. A set of core pediatric sedation outcome domains and outcome measures can be developed on the basis of our findings. We believe that consensus among all stakeholders regarding appropriate domains and measures to evaluate pediatric procedural sedation is possible and that widespread implementation of such recommendations should be pursued.Source
Anesth Analg. 2017 Sep 14. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002456. Link to article on publisher's siteDOI
10.1213/ANE.0000000000002456Permanent Link to this Item
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/43605PubMed ID
28922236Related Resources
Link to Article in PubMedae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1213/ANE.0000000000002456