Women's Representation Among Members and Leaders of National Medical Specialty Societies
Authors
Jagsi, ReshmaMeans, Olivia
Lautenberger, Diana
Jones, Rochelle D.
Griffith, Kent A.
Flotte, Terence R.
Gordon, Lynn K.
Rexrode, Kathryn M.
Wagner, Lori W.
Chatterjee, Archana
UMass Chan Affiliations
Department of PediatricsDocument Type
Accepted ManuscriptPublication Date
2019-10-15Keywords
National medical specialty societiesgender demographics
Gender and Sexuality
Health and Medical Administration
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
PURPOSE: National medical specialty societies speak for their respective fields in policy debates, influence research, affect trainees' specialization decisions, provide career development opportunities, and confer awards and recognitions. This study provides a comprehensive overview of the gender demographics of society members and leaders. METHOD: In 2016, the Group on Women in Medicine and Science (of the Association of American Medical Colleges) sought to characterize the gender of members and leaders of specialty societies from 2000-2015. This report provides descriptive data, including how many of the responding societies (representing each of 30 major medical specialties) had substantial ( > 10%) increases in women's representation among leadership between the first and second halves of the study period. RESULTS: The average proportion of female full members in responding societies was 25.4% in 2005; 29.3% in 2015. The proportion of women serving as the highest-ranking elected leader between 2000-2015 in each specialty ranged from 0 to 37.5% (mean 15.8%). The mean proportion of women on governing boards ranged from 0 to 37.3% (mean of means, 18.8%) in 2000-07 and from 0 to 47.6% (mean of means, 25.2%) in 2008-2015. In 9 specialties, the mean percentage of women serving on governing boards increased by > 10% from the first to second half of the study period. CONCLUSIONS: Although many women are full members of specialty societies, women still constitute a minority of leaders. This report establishes a baseline from which to evaluate the effect of societies' efforts to improve diversity, equity, and inclusion.Source
Acad Med. 2019 Oct 15. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003038. Link to article on publisher's site
DOI
10.1097/ACM.0000000000003038Permanent Link to this Item
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/43701PubMed ID
31625994Related Resources
Rights
© 2020 by the Association of American Medical Colleges. Final accepted manuscript posted after 12 months with a Creative Commons Attribution – Non-Commercial (CC BY-NC) license as allowed by the publisher's policy at http://www.wkopenhealth.com/Institutions.html.Distribution License
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1097/ACM.0000000000003038
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © 2020 by the Association of American Medical Colleges. Final accepted manuscript posted after 12 months with a Creative Commons Attribution – Non-Commercial (CC BY-NC) license as allowed by the publisher's policy at http://www.wkopenhealth.com/Institutions.html.