Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGe, Hui
dc.contributor.authorWalhout, Albertha J. M.
dc.contributor.authorVidal, Marc
dc.date2022-08-11T08:10:15.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T17:01:38Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T17:01:38Z
dc.date.issued2003-10-11
dc.date.submitted2009-11-23
dc.identifier.citationTrends Genet. 2003 Oct;19(10):551-60. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2003.08.009">Link to article on publisher's site</a>
dc.identifier.issn0168-9525 (Print)
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.tig.2003.08.009
dc.identifier.pmid14550629
dc.identifier.pmid14550629
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/44051
dc.description.abstractThe availability of genome sequences for several organisms, including humans, and the resulting first-approximation lists of genes, have allowed a transition from molecular biology to 'modular biology'. In modular biology, biological processes of interest, or modules, are studied as complex systems of functionally interacting macromolecules. Functional genomic and proteomic ('omic') approaches can be helpful to accelerate the identification of the genes and gene products involved in particular modules, and to describe the functional relationships between them. However, the data emerging from individual omic approaches should be viewed with caution because of the occurrence of false-negative and false-positive results and because single annotations are not sufficient for an understanding of gene function. To increase the reliability of gene function annotation, multiple independent datasets need to be integrated. Here, we review the recent development of strategies for such integration and we argue that these will be important for a systems approach to modular biology.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=14550629&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a>
dc.relation.urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2003.08.009
dc.subjectComputational Biology
dc.subjectDatabases, Genetic
dc.subjectDatabases, Protein
dc.subjectForecasting
dc.subjectGenomics
dc.subjectProtein Interaction Mapping
dc.subjectProteomics
dc.subject*Systems Integration
dc.subjectGenetics and Genomics
dc.titleIntegrating 'omic' information: a bridge between genomics and systems biology
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleTrends in genetics : TIG
dc.source.volume19
dc.source.issue10
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/pgfe_pp/27
dc.identifier.contextkey1070850
html.description.abstract<p>The availability of genome sequences for several organisms, including humans, and the resulting first-approximation lists of genes, have allowed a transition from molecular biology to 'modular biology'. In modular biology, biological processes of interest, or modules, are studied as complex systems of functionally interacting macromolecules. Functional genomic and proteomic ('omic') approaches can be helpful to accelerate the identification of the genes and gene products involved in particular modules, and to describe the functional relationships between them. However, the data emerging from individual omic approaches should be viewed with caution because of the occurrence of false-negative and false-positive results and because single annotations are not sufficient for an understanding of gene function. To increase the reliability of gene function annotation, multiple independent datasets need to be integrated. Here, we review the recent development of strategies for such integration and we argue that these will be important for a systems approach to modular biology.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathpgfe_pp/27
dc.contributor.departmentProgram in Molecular Medicine
dc.contributor.departmentProgram in Gene Function and Expression
dc.source.pages551-60


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Publisher version

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record