Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorOsborne, John D.
dc.contributor.authorFlatow, Jared M.
dc.contributor.authorHolko, Michelle
dc.contributor.authorLin, Simon M.
dc.contributor.authorKibbe, Warren A.
dc.contributor.authorZhu, Lihua Julie
dc.contributor.authorDanila, Maria I.
dc.contributor.authorFeng, Gang
dc.contributor.authorChisholm, Rex L.
dc.date2022-08-11T08:10:16.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T17:01:52Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T17:01:52Z
dc.date.issued2009-07-25
dc.date.submitted2011-04-19
dc.identifier.citationBMC Genomics. 2009 Jul 7;10 Suppl 1:S6. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-10-S1-S6">Link to article on publisher's site</a>
dc.identifier.issn1471-2164 (Linking)
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/1471-2164-10-S1-S6
dc.identifier.pmid19594883
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/44102
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: The human genome has been extensively annotated with Gene Ontology for biological functions, but minimally computationally annotated for diseases. RESULTS: We used the Unified Medical Language System (UMLS) MetaMap Transfer tool (MMTx) to discover gene-disease relationships from the GeneRIF database. We utilized a comprehensive subset of UMLS, which is disease-focused and structured as a directed acyclic graph (the Disease Ontology), to filter and interpret results from MMTx. The results were validated against the Homayouni gene collection using recall and precision measurements. We compared our results with the widely used Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM) annotations. CONCLUSION: The validation data set suggests a 91% recall rate and 97% precision rate of disease annotation using GeneRIF, in contrast with a 22% recall and 98% precision using OMIM. Our thesaurus-based approach allows for comparisons to be made between disease containing databases and allows for increased accuracy in disease identification through synonym matching. The much higher recall rate of our approach demonstrates that annotating human genome with Disease Ontology and GeneRIF for diseases dramatically increases the coverage of the disease annotation of human genome.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=19594883&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a>
dc.subjectComputational Biology
dc.subject*Databases, Genetic
dc.subject*Genome, Human
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subject*Software
dc.subject*Unified Medical Language System
dc.subjectGenetics and Genomics
dc.titleAnnotating the human genome with Disease Ontology
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleBMC genomics
dc.source.volume10 Suppl 1
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1076&amp;context=pgfe_pp&amp;unstamped=1
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/pgfe_pp/76
dc.identifier.contextkey1946731
refterms.dateFOA2022-08-23T17:01:53Z
html.description.abstract<p>BACKGROUND: The human genome has been extensively annotated with Gene Ontology for biological functions, but minimally computationally annotated for diseases.</p> <p>RESULTS: We used the Unified Medical Language System (UMLS) MetaMap Transfer tool (MMTx) to discover gene-disease relationships from the GeneRIF database. We utilized a comprehensive subset of UMLS, which is disease-focused and structured as a directed acyclic graph (the Disease Ontology), to filter and interpret results from MMTx. The results were validated against the Homayouni gene collection using recall and precision measurements. We compared our results with the widely used Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM) annotations.</p> <p>CONCLUSION: The validation data set suggests a 91% recall rate and 97% precision rate of disease annotation using GeneRIF, in contrast with a 22% recall and 98% precision using OMIM. Our thesaurus-based approach allows for comparisons to be made between disease containing databases and allows for increased accuracy in disease identification through synonym matching. The much higher recall rate of our approach demonstrates that annotating human genome with Disease Ontology and GeneRIF for diseases dramatically increases the coverage of the disease annotation of human genome.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathpgfe_pp/76
dc.contributor.departmentProgram in Molecular Medicine
dc.contributor.departmentProgram in Gene Function and Expression
dc.source.pagesS6


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
bmc_genomics_annotating_the_hu ...
Size:
781.3Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record