Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTanriverdi, Kahraman
dc.contributor.authorKucukural, Alper
dc.contributor.authorMikhalev, Ekaterina
dc.contributor.authorTanriverdi, Selim E.
dc.contributor.authorLee, Rosalind
dc.contributor.authorAmbros, Victor R.
dc.contributor.authorFreedman, Jane
dc.date2022-08-11T08:10:18.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T17:03:33Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T17:03:33Z
dc.date.issued2016-05-15
dc.date.submitted2016-04-13
dc.identifier.citationAnal Biochem. 2016 May 15;501:66-74. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2016.02.019. Epub 2016 Mar 10. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ab.2016.02.019">Link to article on publisher's site</a>
dc.identifier.issn0003-2697 (Linking)
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ab.2016.02.019
dc.identifier.pmid26969789
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/44452
dc.description.abstractMicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small noncoding RNA molecules that function in RNA silencing and posttranscriptional regulation of gene expression. miRNAs in biofluids are being used for clinical diagnosis as well as disease prediction. Efficient and reproducible isolation methods are crucial for extracellular RNA detection. To determine the best methodologies for miRNA detection from plasma, the performance of four RNA extraction kits, including an in-house kit, were determined with miScript miRNA assay technology; all were measured using a high-throughput quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) platform (BioMark System) with 90 human miRNA assays. In addition, the performances of complementary DNA (cDNA) and preamplification kits for TaqMan miRNA assays and miScript miRNA assays were compared using the same 90 miRNAs on the BioMark System. There were significant quantification cycle (Cq) value differences for the detection of miRNA targets between isolation kits. cDNA, preamplification, and qPCR performances were also varied. In summary, this study demonstrates differences among RNA isolation methods as measured by reverse transcription (RT)-qPCR. Importantly, differences were also noted in cDNA and preamplification performance using TaqMan and miScript. The in-house kit performed better than the other three kits. These findings demonstrate significant variability between isolation and detection methods for low-abundant miRNA detection from biofluids.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=26969789&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a>
dc.relation.urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ab.2016.02.019
dc.subjectExtracellular RNA
dc.subjectHigh-throughput qPCR
dc.subjectRNA isolation
dc.subjectRT–qPCR
dc.subjectmiRNA
dc.subjectBiochemistry
dc.titleComparison of RNA isolation and associated methods for extracellular RNA detection by high-throughput quantitative polymerase chain reaction
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleAnalytical biochemistry
dc.source.volume501
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/pmm_pp/43
dc.identifier.contextkey8471522
html.description.abstract<p>MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small noncoding RNA molecules that function in RNA silencing and posttranscriptional regulation of gene expression. miRNAs in biofluids are being used for clinical diagnosis as well as disease prediction. Efficient and reproducible isolation methods are crucial for extracellular RNA detection. To determine the best methodologies for miRNA detection from plasma, the performance of four RNA extraction kits, including an in-house kit, were determined with miScript miRNA assay technology; all were measured using a high-throughput quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) platform (BioMark System) with 90 human miRNA assays. In addition, the performances of complementary DNA (cDNA) and preamplification kits for TaqMan miRNA assays and miScript miRNA assays were compared using the same 90 miRNAs on the BioMark System. There were significant quantification cycle (Cq) value differences for the detection of miRNA targets between isolation kits. cDNA, preamplification, and qPCR performances were also varied. In summary, this study demonstrates differences among RNA isolation methods as measured by reverse transcription (RT)-qPCR. Importantly, differences were also noted in cDNA and preamplification performance using TaqMan and miScript. The in-house kit performed better than the other three kits. These findings demonstrate significant variability between isolation and detection methods for low-abundant miRNA detection from biofluids.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathpmm_pp/43
dc.contributor.departmentUMass Metabolic Network
dc.contributor.departmentProgram in Molecular Medicine
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine
dc.source.pages66-74


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Publisher version

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record