Processing strategies and software solutions for data-independent acquisition in mass spectrometry
Authors
Bilbao, AivettVaresio, Emmanuel
Luban, Jeremy
Strambio-De-Castillia, Caterina
Hopfgartner, Gerard
Muller, Markus
Lisacek, Frederique
UMass Chan Affiliations
Program in Molecular MedicineDocument Type
Journal ArticlePublication Date
2015-03-01Keywords
Bottom-up proteomicsData processing and analysis
Data-independent acquisition
Label-free quantification
Mass spectrometry-LC-MS/MS
Amino Acids, Peptides, and Proteins
Biochemistry
Genomics
Molecular Biology
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Data-independent acquisition (DIA) offers several advantages over data-dependent acquisition (DDA) schemes for characterizing complex protein digests analyzed by LC-MS/MS. In contrast to the sequential detection, selection, and analysis of individual ions during DDA, DIA systematically parallelizes the fragmentation of all detectable ions within a wide m/z range regardless of intensity, thereby providing broader dynamic range of detected signals, improved reproducibility for identification, better sensitivity, and accuracy for quantification, and, potentially, enhanced proteome coverage. To fully exploit these advantages, composite or multiplexed fragment ion spectra generated by DIA require more elaborate processing algorithms compared to DDA. This review examines different DIA schemes and, in particular, discusses the concepts applied to and related to data processing. Available software implementations for identification and quantification are presented as comprehensively as possible and examples of software usage are cited. Processing workflows, including complete proprietary frameworks or combinations of modules from different open source data processing packages are described and compared in terms of software availability and usability, programming language, operating system support, input/output data formats, as well as the main principles employed in the algorithms used for identification and quantification. This comparative study concludes with further discussion of current limitations and expectable improvements in the short- and midterm future.Source
Proteomics. 2015 Mar;15(5-6):964-80. doi: 10.1002/pmic.201400323. Epub 2015 Feb 2. Link to article on publisher's site
DOI
10.1002/pmic.201400323Permanent Link to this Item
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/44477PubMed ID
25430050Related Resources
ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1002/pmic.201400323