Optimization of human dendritic cell sample preparation for mass spectrometry-based proteomic studies
Name:
Publisher version
View Source
Access full-text PDFOpen Access
View Source
Check access options
Check access options
Authors
Zhang, YingBottinelli, Dario
Lisacek, Frederique
Luban, Jeremy
Strambio-De-Castillia, Caterina
Varesio, Emmanuel
Hopfgartner, Gerard
UMass Chan Affiliations
Program in Molecular MedicineDocument Type
Journal ArticlePublication Date
2015-09-01Keywords
LC–MS/MSMonocyte-derived dendritic cells
Protein precipitation
Protein solubilization
Proteomics
Sample preparation
Amino Acids, Peptides, and Proteins
Biochemistry
Chemistry
Genomics
Molecular Biology
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Dendritic cells (DCs) are specialized leukocytes that orchestrate the adaptive immune response. Mass spectrometry (MS)-based proteomic study of these cells presents technical challenges, especially when the DCs are human in origin due to the paucity of available biological material. Here, to maximize MS coverage of the global human DC proteome, different cell disruption methods, lysis conditions, protein precipitation, and protein pellet solubilization and denaturation methods were compared. Mechanical disruption of DC cell pellets under cryogenic conditions, coupled with the use of RIPA (radioimmunoprecipitation assay) buffer, was shown to be the method of choice based on total protein extraction and on the solubilization and identification of nuclear proteins. Precipitation by acetone was found to be more efficient than that by 10% trichloroacetic acid (TCA)/acetone, allowing in excess of 28% more protein identifications. Although being an effective strategy to eliminate the detergent residue, the acetone wash step caused a loss of protein identifications. However, this potential drawback was overcome by adding 1% sodium deoxycholate into the dissolution buffer, which enhanced both solubility of the precipitated proteins and digestion efficiency. This in turn resulted in 6 to 11% more distinct peptides and 14 to 19% more total proteins identified than using 0.5M triethylammonium bicarbonate alone, with the greatest increase (34%) for hydrophobic proteins.Source
Anal Biochem. 2015 Sep 1;484:40-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2015.05.007. Epub 2015 May 15. Link to article on publisher's site
DOI
10.1016/j.ab.2015.05.007Permanent Link to this Item
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/44478PubMed ID
25983236Related Resources
ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/j.ab.2015.05.007