• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • UMass Chan Departments, Programs and Centers
    • Population and Quantitative Health Sciences
    • UMass Worcester Prevention Research Center
    • UMass Worcester PRC Publications
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • UMass Chan Departments, Programs and Centers
    • Population and Quantitative Health Sciences
    • UMass Worcester Prevention Research Center
    • UMass Worcester PRC Publications
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of eScholarship@UMassChanCommunitiesPublication DateAuthorsUMass Chan AffiliationsTitlesDocument TypesKeywordsThis CollectionPublication DateAuthorsUMass Chan AffiliationsTitlesDocument TypesKeywords

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Help

    AboutSubmission GuidelinesData Deposit PolicySearchingAccessibilityTerms of UseWebsite Migration FAQ

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    Predicting Fracture Risk in Younger Postmenopausal Women: Comparison of the Garvan and FRAX Risk Calculators in the Women's Health Initiative Study

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Authors
    Crandall, Carolyn J.
    Larson, Joseph
    LaCroix, Andrea
    Cauley, Jane A.
    LeBoff, Meryl S.
    Li, Wenjun
    LeBlanc, Erin S.
    Edwards, Beatrice J.
    Manson, JoAnn E.
    Ensrud, Kristine
    UMass Chan Affiliations
    UMass Worcester Prevention Research Center
    Division of Biomedical Data Science, Department of Medicine
    Document Type
    Journal Article
    Publication Date
    2018-10-17
    Keywords
    FRAX
    Garvan
    fracture
    fracture risk assessment
    osteoporosis
    Community Health and Preventive Medicine
    Health Services Administration
    Health Services Research
    Musculoskeletal Diseases
    Musculoskeletal System
    Preventive Medicine
    Women's Health
    Show allShow less
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Link to Full Text
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-018-4696-z
    Abstract
    BACKGROUND: Guidelines recommend fracture risk assessment in postmenopausal women aged 50-64, but the optimal method is unknown. OBJECTIVES: To compare discrimination and calibration of the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) and Garvan fracture risk calculator for predicting fractures in postmenopausal women aged 50-64 at baseline. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. PARTICIPANTS: Sixty-three thousand seven hundred twenty-three postmenopausal women aged 50-64 years participating in the Women's Health Initiative Observational Study and Clinical Trials. MAIN MEASURES: Incident hip fractures and major osteoporotic fractures (MOF) during 10-year follow-up. Calculated FRAX- and Garvan-predicted hip fracture and MOF fracture probabilities. KEY RESULTS: The observed 10-year hip fracture probability was 0.3% for women aged 50-54 years (n = 14,768), 0.6% for women aged 55-59 years (n = 22,442), and 1.1% for women aged 60-64 years (n = 25,513). At sensitivity thresholds > /= 80%, specificity of both tools for detecting incident hip fracture during 10 years of follow-up was low: Garvan 30.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 30.3-31.0%) and FRAX 43.1% (95% CI 42.7-43.5%). At maximal area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC(c), 0.58 for Garvan, 0.65 for FRAX), sensitivity was 16.0% (95% CI 12.7-19.4%) for Garvan and 59.2% (95% CI 54.7-63.7%) for FRAX. At AUC(c) values, sensitivity was lower in African American and Hispanic women than among white women and lower in women aged 50-54 than those 60-64 years old. Observed hip fracture probabilities were similar to FRAX-predicted probabilities but greater than Garvan-predicted probabilities. At AUC(c) values (0.56 for both tools), sensitivity for identifying MOF was also low (range 26.7-46.8%). At AUC(c) values (0.55 for both tools), sensitivity for identifying any clinical fracture ranged from 18.1 to 34.0%. CONCLUSIONS: In postmenopausal women aged 50-64 years, the FRAX and Garvan fracture risk calculator discriminate poorly between women who do and do not experience fracture during 10-year follow-up. There is no useful threshold for either tool.
    Source

    J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Oct 17. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4696-z. [Epub ahead of print] Link to article on publisher's site

    DOI
    10.1007/s11606-018-4696-z
    Permanent Link to this Item
    http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/44526
    PubMed ID
    30334182
    Related Resources

    Link to Article in PubMed

    ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
    10.1007/s11606-018-4696-z
    Scopus Count
    Collections
    UMass Worcester PRC Publications

    entitlement

    Related items

    Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.

    • Thumbnail

      Policy Brief: Addressing Social Determinants of Health through Community Health Workers: A Call to Action

      London, Katharine; Damio, Grace; Ferrazo, Meredith; Perez-Escamalla, Rafael; Wiggins, Noelle (2018-01-30)
      This technical report was compiled by the Hispanic Health Council in partnership with Southwestern AHEC and a panel of Community Health Worker Policy Research Experts which included our Katharine London from the Center for Health Law and Economics. The report offers a number of policy recommendations for community health workers for communities that might benefit from community-based services. The report offers recommendations on; payment of community health workers; community health worker caseloads; community health worker recruitment; community health worker training; reflective and trauma-informed mentoring and supportive supervision of community health workers; integration of community health workers into care teams; documenting the effect of community heal worker services on social determination of health. The Hispanic Health Council believes a service design that effectively supports community health workers would incorporate the seven areas of policy recommendation included in this report.
    • Thumbnail

      A Public Health Framework for the State Mental Health Authority: A Call for Action by Massachusetts Consumers and Family Members

      Delman, Jonathan (2006-01-01)
      During the Spring of 2006, Consumer Quality Initiatives (CQI) conducted 20 focus groups across the state, 12 with adults with mental illness, 3 with parents of youth with serious emotional disorder, 2 with youth with SED, 1 with family members of adult consumers, and 2 with youth in transition. Supported by a contract with Massachusetts Department of Mental Health (DMH), the goal was to assist DMH in framing the criteria for its upcoming reprocurement. Our findings reveal a frustration with an approach to health care delivery that focuses primarily on the provision of psychiatric care (egs, medication, therapy, hospitalization). We reviewed the focus group reports to identify the most significant themes, which clustered within eight broad categories.
    • Thumbnail

      Making the Case for Sustainable Funding for Community Health Worker Services: Talking to Payers and Providers

      London, Katharine (2018-01-27)
      In this presentation, Katharine London of the Center for Health Law and Economics makes her case for offering sustainable funding for community health worker services. Research has shown community health workers can have a distinct impact on health systems, helping them improve population health and contain costs, while also promoting health equity and community engagement. This presentation was designed to assist CHWs and other advocates in engaging with policymakers and payers to support CHW sustainability and develop a financial plan for their CHW work. It was presented as part of a CHW Sustainability event held at the Families USA’s annual conference, Health Action 2018: Staying Strong for America’s Families, in Washington, DC. See Katharine London's blog post on payment delivery methods for community health workers here.
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2023)  DuraSpace
    Lamar Soutter Library, UMass Chan Medical School | 55 Lake Avenue North | Worcester, MA 01655 USA
    Quick Guide | escholarship@umassmed.edu
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.