We are upgrading the repository! A content freeze is in effect until December 6, 2024. New submissions or changes to existing items will not be allowed during this period. All content already published will remain publicly available for searching and downloading. Updates will be posted in the Website Upgrade 2024 FAQ in the sidebar Help menu. Reach out to escholarship@umassmed.edu with any questions.
A comparison of the psychometric properties of the hooked on nicotine checklist and the modified Fagerstrom tolerance questionnaire
Name:
Publisher version
View Source
Access full-text PDFOpen Access
View Source
Check access options
Check access options
Authors
Wellman, Robert J.DiFranza, Joseph R.
Pbert, Lori
Fletcher, Kenneth E.
Flint, Alan J.
Young, Martin H.
Druker, Susan
UMass Chan Affiliations
Department of PediatricsDepartment of Psychiatry
Department of Medicine, Division of Preventive and Behavioral Medicine
Department of Family Medicine and Community Health
Document Type
Journal ArticlePublication Date
2006-03-05Keywords
AdolescentAdolescent Behavior
Adult
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Male
Personal Autonomy
Prospective Studies
*Psychometrics
Questionnaires
Reproducibility of Results
Smoking
Smoking Cessation
Behavioral Disciplines and Activities
Behavior and Behavior Mechanisms
Community Health and Preventive Medicine
Preventive Medicine
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
We compared the psychometric properties of the Hooked on Nicotine Checklist (HONC) and the Modified Fagerstrom Tolerance Questionnaire (MFTQ). Adolescent current smokers (n = 215) completed both instruments three times, at baseline and 6- and 12-month follow-up. Internal consistency of the HONC was high (alpha = 0.92), as was its stability over the follow-up interval (intraclass correlation (ICC) = 0.93 over 6 months and 0.91 over 1 year). Internal consistency of the MFTQ was acceptable (alpha = 0.83), and its stability over the follow-up interval was similar to that reported previously (ICC = 0.79 at 6 months and 0.76 at 1 year). The HONC predicted smoking at both follow-up points, while the MFTQ did so only at 6 months. The HONC compared favorably with the MFTQ in all respects. The most important advantage of the HONC is that it is measuring a clearly defined concept, diminished autonomy over tobacco, which begins when the sequelae of tobacco use present a barrier to quitting.Source
Addict Behav. 2006 Mar;31(3):486-95. Epub 2005 Jun 29. Link to article on publisher's siteDOI
10.1016/j.addbeh.2005.05.031Permanent Link to this Item
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/44722PubMed ID
15993004Related Resources
Link to Article in PubMedae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/j.addbeh.2005.05.031