Socioeconomic status, energy cost, and nutrient content of supermarket food purchases
Name:
Publisher version
View Source
Access full-text PDFOpen Access
View Source
Check access options
Check access options
Authors
Appelhans, Bradley M.Milliron, Brandy-Joe
Woolf, Kathleen
Johnson, Tricia J.
Pagoto, Sherry L.
Schneider, Kristin L.
Whited, Matthew C.
Ventrelle, Jennifer C.
UMass Chan Affiliations
Department of Medicine, Division of Preventive and Behavioral MedicineDocument Type
Journal ArticlePublication Date
2012-04-01Keywords
AdultCommerce
Data Collection
Dietary Fats
Educational Status
Energy Intake
Female
Food
Food Analysis
Food Labeling
Food Packaging
*Food Preferences
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
*Nutritive Value
Poverty
Socioeconomic Factors
Software
United States
Behavioral Disciplines and Activities
Behavior and Behavior Mechanisms
Community Health and Preventive Medicine
Dietetics and Clinical Nutrition
Preventive Medicine
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
BACKGROUND: The relative affordability of energy-dense versus nutrient-rich foods may promote socioeconomic disparities in dietary quality and obesity. Although supermarkets are the largest food source in the American diet, the associations between SES and the cost and nutrient content of freely chosen food purchases have not been described. PURPOSE: To investigate relationships of SES with the energy cost ($/1000 kcal) and nutrient content of freely chosen supermarket purchases. METHODS: Supermarket shoppers (n=69) were recruited at a Phoenix AZ supermarket in 2009. The energy cost and nutrient content of participants' purchases were calculated from photographs of food packaging and nutrition labels using dietary analysis software. Data were analyzed in 2010-2011. RESULTS: Two SES indicators, education and household income as a percentage of the federal poverty guideline (FPG), were associated with the energy cost of purchased foods. Adjusting for covariates, the amount spent on 1000 kcal of food was $0.26 greater for every multiple of the FPG, and those with a baccalaureate or postbaccalaureate degree spent an additional $1.05 for every 1000 kcal of food compared to those with no college education. Lower energy cost was associated with higher total fat and less protein, dietary fiber, and vegetables per 1000 kcal purchased. CONCLUSIONS: Low-SES supermarket shoppers purchase calories in inexpensive forms that are higher in fat and less nutrient-rich. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.Source
Am J Prev Med. 2012 Apr;42(4):398-402. Link to article on publisher's siteDOI
10.1016/j.amepre.2011.12.007Permanent Link to this Item
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/44829PubMed ID
22424253Related Resources
Link to Article in PubMedae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/j.amepre.2011.12.007