Movement Disorder Society-sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS): scale presentation and clinimetric testing results
Authors
Goetz, ChristopherTilley, Barbara C.
Shaftman, Stephanie R.
Stebbins, Glenn T.
Fahn, Stanley
Martinez-Martin, Pablo
Poewe, Werner
Sampaio, Cristina
Stern, Matthew B.
Dodel, Richard
Dubois, Bruno
Holloway, Robert
Jankovic, Joseph
Kulisevsky, Jaime
Lang, Anthony E.
Lees, Andrew
Leurgans, Sue
LeWitt, Peter A.
Nyenhuis, David
Olanow, C. Warren
Rascol, Olivier
Schrag, Anette
Teresi, Jeanne A.
van Hilten, Jacobus J.
LaPelle, Nancy R.
UMass Chan Affiliations
Department of Medicine, Division of Preventive and Behavioral MedicineDocument Type
Journal ArticlePublication Date
2008-11-15Keywords
AdultAged
Aged, 80 and over
*Disability Evaluation
Factor Analysis, Statistical
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Movement Disorders
Neurologic Examination
Parkinson Disease
*Severity of Illness Index
Societies, Medical
Nervous System Diseases
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
We present a clinimetric assessment of the Movement Disorder Society (MDS)-sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS). The MDS-UDPRS Task Force revised and expanded the UPDRS using recommendations from a published critique. The MDS-UPDRS has four parts, namely, I: Non-motor Experiences of Daily Living; II: Motor Experiences of Daily Living; III: Motor Examination; IV: Motor Complications. Twenty questions are completed by the patient/caregiver. Item-specific instructions and an appendix of complementary additional scales are provided. Movement disorder specialists and study coordinators administered the UPDRS (55 items) and MDS-UPDRS (65 items) to 877 English speaking (78% non-Latino Caucasian) patients with Parkinson's disease from 39 sites. We compared the two scales using correlative techniques and factor analysis. The MDS-UPDRS showed high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.79-0.93 across parts) and correlated with the original UPDRS (rho = 0.96). MDS-UPDRS across-part correlations ranged from 0.22 to 0.66. Reliable factor structures for each part were obtained (comparative fit index > 0.90 for each part), which support the use of sum scores for each part in preference to a total score of all parts. The combined clinimetric results of this study support the validity of the MDS-UPDRS for rating PD.Source
Mov Disord. 2008 Nov 15;23(15):2129-70. Link to article on publisher's siteDOI
10.1002/mds.22340Permanent Link to this Item
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/44834PubMed ID
19025984Related Resources
Link to Article in PubMedae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1002/mds.22340