Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSchwartz, Carolyn E.
dc.contributor.authorLennes, Inga
dc.contributor.authorHammes, Bernard
dc.contributor.authorLapham, Carrie
dc.contributor.authorBottner, Wayne
dc.contributor.authorMa, Yunsheng
dc.date2022-08-11T08:10:22.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T17:05:47Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T17:05:47Z
dc.date.issued2003-08-01
dc.date.submitted2008-01-15
dc.identifier.citationJ Palliat Med. 2003 Aug;6(4):593-603. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/109662103768253704">Link to article on publisher's site</a>
dc.identifier.issn1096-6218 (Print)
dc.identifier.doi10.1089/109662103768253704
dc.identifier.pmid14516501
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/44936
dc.description.abstractAdvance care planning requires an explicit and comprehensive discussion of patient values and conceptualization of quality of life. The Living Well open-ended interview intervention was developed to help patients and their health care agents to engage in a meaningful discussion of values so that decisions made in the last year of life are made with the patients' values in mind. We used qualitative and quantitative analysis to streamline this 10-question interview, and to generate hypotheses for future research. Interviews with 52 terminally ill patients were coded according to methodological weaknesses and content (support, spirit/feelings, palliative care, and quality of life). Node analysis revealed that three primary and three backup/probe questions yielded information that minimized misinformation, sampled from all four content areas, led to discussions of importance for good planning and decision-making, and may have led to earlier hospice admission than the national average. Two emerging themes, Generativity (passing on values or assets to the next generation) and essence (simple pleasures in everyday life), and were then quantitatively analyzed. People who mentioned generativity tended to be older, had a longer length of hospice stay, and a longer time to death after interview, compared to those who did not mention the theme. People who mentioned essence also tended to be older, but tended to have a shorter length of hospice stay and a shorter time to death after the interview. We conclude that this interview may improve access to hospice, and that generativity and essence are worthwhile themes for future research.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=14516501&dopt=Abstract ">Link to article in PubMed</a>
dc.relation.urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1089/109662103768253704
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subject*Advance Care Planning
dc.subjectAged
dc.subjectAged, 80 and over
dc.subject*Attitude to Death
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectInterviews as Topic
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectMiddle Aged
dc.subject*Palliative Care
dc.subject*Quality of Life
dc.subjectSocial Support
dc.subjectSpirituality
dc.subjectGeriatrics
dc.subjectHealth Services Research
dc.subjectPublic Health Education and Promotion
dc.titleHoning an advance care planning intervention using qualitative analysis: the Living Well interview
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleJournal of palliative medicine
dc.source.volume6
dc.source.issue4
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/prevbeh_pp/5
dc.identifier.contextkey413077
html.description.abstract<p>Advance care planning requires an explicit and comprehensive discussion of patient values and conceptualization of quality of life. The Living Well open-ended interview intervention was developed to help patients and their health care agents to engage in a meaningful discussion of values so that decisions made in the last year of life are made with the patients' values in mind. We used qualitative and quantitative analysis to streamline this 10-question interview, and to generate hypotheses for future research. Interviews with 52 terminally ill patients were coded according to methodological weaknesses and content (support, spirit/feelings, palliative care, and quality of life). Node analysis revealed that three primary and three backup/probe questions yielded information that minimized misinformation, sampled from all four content areas, led to discussions of importance for good planning and decision-making, and may have led to earlier hospice admission than the national average. Two emerging themes, Generativity (passing on values or assets to the next generation) and essence (simple pleasures in everyday life), and were then quantitatively analyzed. People who mentioned generativity tended to be older, had a longer length of hospice stay, and a longer time to death after interview, compared to those who did not mention the theme. People who mentioned essence also tended to be older, but tended to have a shorter length of hospice stay and a shorter time to death after the interview. We conclude that this interview may improve access to hospice, and that generativity and essence are worthwhile themes for future research.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathprevbeh_pp/5
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Medicine, Division of Preventive and Behavioral Medicine
dc.source.pages593-603


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record