Number of 24-hour diet recalls needed to estimate energy intake
| dc.contributor.author | Ma, Yunsheng | |
| dc.contributor.author | Olendzki, Barbara C. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Pagoto, Sherry L. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Hurley, Thomas G. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Magner, Robert P. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ockene, Ira S. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Schneider, Kristin L. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Merriam, Philip A. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Hebert, James R. | |
| dc.date | 2022-08-11T08:10:22.000 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-08-23T17:05:52Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2022-08-23T17:05:52Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2009-07-07 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2010-03-12 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Ann Epidemiol. 2009 Aug;19(8):553-9. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.annepidem.2009.04.010">Link to article on publisher's site</a> | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1047-2797 (Linking) | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.annepidem.2009.04.010 | |
| dc.identifier.pmid | 19576535 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/44954 | |
| dc.description.abstract | PURPOSE: Twenty-four-hour diet recall interviews (24HRs) are used to assess diet and to validate other diet assessment instruments. Therefore it is important to know how many 24HRs are required to describe an individual's intake. METHOD: Seventy-nine middle-aged white women completed seven 24HRs over a 14-day period, during which energy expenditure (EE) was determined by the doubly labeled water method (DLW). Mean daily intakes were compared to DLW-derived EE using paired t tests. Linear mixed models were used to evaluate the effect of call sequence and day of the week on 24HR-derived energy intake while adjusting for education, relative body weight, social desirability, and an interaction between call sequence and social desirability. RESULTS: Mean EE from DLW was 2115 kcal/day. Adjusted 24HR-derived energy intake was lowest at call 1 (1501 kcal/day); significantly higher energy intake was observed at calls 2 and 3 (2246 and 2315 kcal/day, respectively). Energy intake on Friday was significantly lower than on Sunday. Averaging energy intake from the first two calls better approximated true energy expenditure than did the first call, and averaging the first three calls further improved the estimate (p=0.02 for both comparisons). Additional calls did not improve estimation. CONCLUSIONS: Energy intake is underreported on the first 24HR. Three 24HRs appear optimal for estimating energy intake. | |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | |
| dc.relation | <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=19576535&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a> | |
| dc.relation.url | http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2803049/pdf/nihms119634.pdf | |
| dc.subject | Body Mass Index | |
| dc.subject | Data Collection | |
| dc.subject | *Diet | |
| dc.subject | *Energy Intake | |
| dc.subject | Energy Metabolism | |
| dc.subject | Female | |
| dc.subject | Humans | |
| dc.subject | *Mental Recall | |
| dc.subject | Middle Aged | |
| dc.subject | Socioeconomic Factors | |
| dc.subject | Behavioral Disciplines and Activities | |
| dc.subject | Behavior and Behavior Mechanisms | |
| dc.subject | Community Health and Preventive Medicine | |
| dc.subject | Preventive Medicine | |
| dc.title | Number of 24-hour diet recalls needed to estimate energy intake | |
| dc.type | Journal Article | |
| dc.source.journaltitle | Annals of epidemiology | |
| dc.source.volume | 19 | |
| dc.source.issue | 8 | |
| dc.identifier.legacycoverpage | https://escholarship.umassmed.edu/prevbeh_pp/67 | |
| dc.identifier.contextkey | 1219033 | |
| html.description.abstract | <p>PURPOSE: Twenty-four-hour diet recall interviews (24HRs) are used to assess diet and to validate other diet assessment instruments. Therefore it is important to know how many 24HRs are required to describe an individual's intake.</p> <p>METHOD: Seventy-nine middle-aged white women completed seven 24HRs over a 14-day period, during which energy expenditure (EE) was determined by the doubly labeled water method (DLW). Mean daily intakes were compared to DLW-derived EE using paired t tests. Linear mixed models were used to evaluate the effect of call sequence and day of the week on 24HR-derived energy intake while adjusting for education, relative body weight, social desirability, and an interaction between call sequence and social desirability.</p> <p>RESULTS: Mean EE from DLW was 2115 kcal/day. Adjusted 24HR-derived energy intake was lowest at call 1 (1501 kcal/day); significantly higher energy intake was observed at calls 2 and 3 (2246 and 2315 kcal/day, respectively). Energy intake on Friday was significantly lower than on Sunday. Averaging energy intake from the first two calls better approximated true energy expenditure than did the first call, and averaging the first three calls further improved the estimate (p=0.02 for both comparisons). Additional calls did not improve estimation.</p> <p>CONCLUSIONS: Energy intake is underreported on the first 24HR. Three 24HRs appear optimal for estimating energy intake.</p> | |
| dc.identifier.submissionpath | prevbeh_pp/67 | |
| dc.contributor.department | Clinical and Population Health Research Program | |
| dc.contributor.department | Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine | |
| dc.contributor.department | Department of Medicine, Division of Preventive and Behavioral Medicine | |
| dc.source.pages | 553-9 |