Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMa, Yunsheng
dc.contributor.authorOlendzki, Barbara C.
dc.contributor.authorPagoto, Sherry L.
dc.contributor.authorHurley, Thomas G.
dc.contributor.authorMagner, Robert P.
dc.contributor.authorOckene, Ira S.
dc.contributor.authorSchneider, Kristin L.
dc.contributor.authorMerriam, Philip A.
dc.contributor.authorHebert, James R.
dc.date2022-08-11T08:10:22.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T17:05:52Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T17:05:52Z
dc.date.issued2009-07-07
dc.date.submitted2010-03-12
dc.identifier.citationAnn Epidemiol. 2009 Aug;19(8):553-9. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.annepidem.2009.04.010">Link to article on publisher's site</a>
dc.identifier.issn1047-2797 (Linking)
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.annepidem.2009.04.010
dc.identifier.pmid19576535
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/44954
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE: Twenty-four-hour diet recall interviews (24HRs) are used to assess diet and to validate other diet assessment instruments. Therefore it is important to know how many 24HRs are required to describe an individual's intake. METHOD: Seventy-nine middle-aged white women completed seven 24HRs over a 14-day period, during which energy expenditure (EE) was determined by the doubly labeled water method (DLW). Mean daily intakes were compared to DLW-derived EE using paired t tests. Linear mixed models were used to evaluate the effect of call sequence and day of the week on 24HR-derived energy intake while adjusting for education, relative body weight, social desirability, and an interaction between call sequence and social desirability. RESULTS: Mean EE from DLW was 2115 kcal/day. Adjusted 24HR-derived energy intake was lowest at call 1 (1501 kcal/day); significantly higher energy intake was observed at calls 2 and 3 (2246 and 2315 kcal/day, respectively). Energy intake on Friday was significantly lower than on Sunday. Averaging energy intake from the first two calls better approximated true energy expenditure than did the first call, and averaging the first three calls further improved the estimate (p=0.02 for both comparisons). Additional calls did not improve estimation. CONCLUSIONS: Energy intake is underreported on the first 24HR. Three 24HRs appear optimal for estimating energy intake.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=19576535&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a>
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2803049/pdf/nihms119634.pdf
dc.subjectBody Mass Index
dc.subjectData Collection
dc.subject*Diet
dc.subject*Energy Intake
dc.subjectEnergy Metabolism
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subject*Mental Recall
dc.subjectMiddle Aged
dc.subjectSocioeconomic Factors
dc.subjectBehavioral Disciplines and Activities
dc.subjectBehavior and Behavior Mechanisms
dc.subjectCommunity Health and Preventive Medicine
dc.subjectPreventive Medicine
dc.titleNumber of 24-hour diet recalls needed to estimate energy intake
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleAnnals of epidemiology
dc.source.volume19
dc.source.issue8
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/prevbeh_pp/67
dc.identifier.contextkey1219033
html.description.abstract<p>PURPOSE: Twenty-four-hour diet recall interviews (24HRs) are used to assess diet and to validate other diet assessment instruments. Therefore it is important to know how many 24HRs are required to describe an individual's intake.</p> <p>METHOD: Seventy-nine middle-aged white women completed seven 24HRs over a 14-day period, during which energy expenditure (EE) was determined by the doubly labeled water method (DLW). Mean daily intakes were compared to DLW-derived EE using paired t tests. Linear mixed models were used to evaluate the effect of call sequence and day of the week on 24HR-derived energy intake while adjusting for education, relative body weight, social desirability, and an interaction between call sequence and social desirability.</p> <p>RESULTS: Mean EE from DLW was 2115 kcal/day. Adjusted 24HR-derived energy intake was lowest at call 1 (1501 kcal/day); significantly higher energy intake was observed at calls 2 and 3 (2246 and 2315 kcal/day, respectively). Energy intake on Friday was significantly lower than on Sunday. Averaging energy intake from the first two calls better approximated true energy expenditure than did the first call, and averaging the first three calls further improved the estimate (p=0.02 for both comparisons). Additional calls did not improve estimation.</p> <p>CONCLUSIONS: Energy intake is underreported on the first 24HR. Three 24HRs appear optimal for estimating energy intake.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathprevbeh_pp/67
dc.contributor.departmentClinical and Population Health Research Program
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Medicine, Division of Preventive and Behavioral Medicine
dc.source.pages553-9


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Publisher version

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record