Use of cognitive interviewing to adapt measurement instruments for low-literate Hispanics
| dc.contributor.author | Rosal, Milagros C. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Carbone, Elena T. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Goins, Karin V. | |
| dc.date | 2022-08-11T08:10:22.000 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-08-23T17:05:55Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2022-08-23T17:05:55Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2003-12-25 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2010-03-19 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Diabetes Educ. 2003 Nov-Dec;29(6):1006-17. | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0145-7217 (Linking) | |
| dc.identifier.pmid | 14692374 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/44967 | |
| dc.description.abstract | PURPOSE: Cognitive interviewing techniques were used to adapt existing measures for use with a population of low-literate Spanish-speaking people with diabetes. METHODS: Five individuals of Caribbean origin with diabetes participated in cognitive interviews for 4 instruments (measuring diabetes knowledge, quality of life, self-management, and depression) adapted for oral administration to low-literate individuals. Audiotaped interviews and handwritten notes were subjected to content analysis to identify problems across the 4 instruments as well as specific to a given instrument. RESULTS: The following key problems were identified: general instructions were not helpful, items that were not specific enough generated a variety of interpretations, some wording was confusing, abstract concepts were difficult to understand, some terminology was unfamiliar, and interpretation of certain words was incorrect. CONCLUSIONS: The data illustrate the usefulness of cognitive interviewing as a first step in the process of adapting measurement instruments. | |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | |
| dc.relation | <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=14692374&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a> | |
| dc.relation.url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/014572170302900611 | |
| dc.subject | Aged | |
| dc.subject | Aged, 80 and over | |
| dc.subject | Caribbean Region | |
| dc.subject | *Cognition | |
| dc.subject | Depression | |
| dc.subject | Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 | |
| dc.subject | Educational Status | |
| dc.subject | Female | |
| dc.subject | Hispanic Americans | |
| dc.subject | Humans | |
| dc.subject | Interviews as Topic | |
| dc.subject | Male | |
| dc.subject | Massachusetts | |
| dc.subject | Middle Aged | |
| dc.subject | Needs Assessment | |
| dc.subject | Patient Education as Topic | |
| dc.subject | Psychometrics | |
| dc.subject | Qualitative Research | |
| dc.subject | Quality of Life | |
| dc.subject | Questionnaires | |
| dc.subject | Self Care | |
| dc.subject | Semantics | |
| dc.subject | Behavioral Disciplines and Activities | |
| dc.subject | Behavior and Behavior Mechanisms | |
| dc.subject | Community Health and Preventive Medicine | |
| dc.subject | Preventive Medicine | |
| dc.title | Use of cognitive interviewing to adapt measurement instruments for low-literate Hispanics | |
| dc.type | Journal Article | |
| dc.source.journaltitle | The Diabetes educator | |
| dc.source.volume | 29 | |
| dc.source.issue | 6 | |
| dc.identifier.legacycoverpage | https://escholarship.umassmed.edu/prevbeh_pp/79 | |
| dc.identifier.contextkey | 1234288 | |
| html.description.abstract | <p>PURPOSE: Cognitive interviewing techniques were used to adapt existing measures for use with a population of low-literate Spanish-speaking people with diabetes.</p> <p>METHODS: Five individuals of Caribbean origin with diabetes participated in cognitive interviews for 4 instruments (measuring diabetes knowledge, quality of life, self-management, and depression) adapted for oral administration to low-literate individuals. Audiotaped interviews and handwritten notes were subjected to content analysis to identify problems across the 4 instruments as well as specific to a given instrument.</p> <p>RESULTS: The following key problems were identified: general instructions were not helpful, items that were not specific enough generated a variety of interpretations, some wording was confusing, abstract concepts were difficult to understand, some terminology was unfamiliar, and interpretation of certain words was incorrect.</p> <p>CONCLUSIONS: The data illustrate the usefulness of cognitive interviewing as a first step in the process of adapting measurement instruments.</p> | |
| dc.identifier.submissionpath | prevbeh_pp/79 | |
| dc.contributor.department | Department of Medicine, Division of Preventive and Behavioral Medicine | |
| dc.source.pages | 1006-17 |