Factors associated with admission to public and private hospitals from a psychiatric emergency screening site
UMass Chan AffiliationsDepartment of Psychiatry
Document TypeJournal Article
Emergency Services, Psychiatric
Referral and Consultation
Refusal to Treat
Health Services Research
Mental and Social Health
Psychiatric and Mental Health
Psychiatry and Psychology
MetadataShow full item record
AbstractOBJECTIVE: The study examined factors associated with admission to public and private hospitals from a mental health care emergency screening system operating under a longstanding mandate to maximize use of private inpatient treatment. METHODS: For 206 patients evaluated at the mental health emergency screening site over a two-and-a-half-month period, data were collected on demographic and clinical characteristics, admission history, services received during the emergency encounter, system variables such as time the patient spent at the emergency screening site, number of admission sites asked to accept the patient, and all reasons cited by providers for refusing to admit the patient. Logistic regression was used to develop a model of factors most likely and least likely to be associated with private hospitalization. RESULTS: Overall, 60 percent of the sample was refused admission by one or more providers, and 55 percent, who were not accepted by and private hospital, became public patients. Private hospital admission was associated with patient or family involvement in referral and disposition, private or Medicaid insurance, a presenting problem of depression or suicidality, and longer time spent at the emergency screening site. Public admission was associated with no insurance, a past history of major public hospitalization, current or past history of assaultiveness, a presenting problem of aggression, and lack of any discharge site. CONCLUSIONS: Private providers are reluctant to admit patients who have characteristics associated with public hospitalization. In the restructuring of health care, a more fully privatized system will likely be called on to absorb such patients. Their care, treatment, and impact on the system should be carefully monitored and evaluated.
SourcePsychiatr Serv. 1995 May;46(5):467-72.
Permanent Link to this Itemhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/45068
Related ResourcesLink to Article in PubMed
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Latent Variable Approaches for Understanding Heterogeneity in Depression: A DissertationUlbricht, Christine M. (2015-04-23)Background: Major depression is one of the most prevalent, disabling, and costly illnesses worldwide. Despite a 400% increase in antidepressant medication use since 1988, fewer than half of treated depression patients experience a clinically meaningful reduction in symptoms and uncertainty exists regarding how to successfully obtain symptom remission. Identifying homogenous subgroups based on clinically observable characteristics could improve the ability to efficiently predict who will benefit from which treatments. Methods: Latent class analysis and latent transition analysis (LTA) were applied to data from the Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression (STAR*D) study to explore how to efficiently identify subgroups comprised of the multiple dimensions of depression and examine changes in subgroup membership during treatment. The specific aims of this dissertation were to: 1) evaluate latent depression subgroups for men and women prior to antidepressant treatment; 2) examine transitions in these subgroups over 12 weeks of citalopram treatment; and 3) examine differences in functional impairment between women’s depression subgroups throughout treatment. Results: Four subgroups of depression were identified for men and women throughout this work. Men’s subgroups were distinguished by depression severity and psychomotor agitation and retardation. Severity, appetite changes, insomnia, and psychomotor disturbances characterized women’s subgroups. Psychiatric comorbidities, especially anxiety disorders, were related to increased odds of membership in baseline moderate and severe depression subgroups for men and women. After 12 weeks of citalopram treatment, depression severity and psychomotor agitation were related to men’s chances of improving. Severity and appetite changes were related to women’s likelihood of improving during treatment. When functional impairment was incorporated in LTA models for women, baseline functional impairment levels were related to both depression subgroups at baseline and chances of moving to a different depression subgroup after treatment. Conclusion: Depression severity, psychomotor disturbances, appetite changes, and insomnia distinguished depression subgroups in STAR*D. Gender, functional impairment, comorbid psychiatric disorders, and likelihood of transitioning to subgroups characterized by symptom improvement differed between these subgroups. The results of this work highlight how relying solely on summary symptom rating scale scores during treatment obscures changes in depression that might be informative for improving treatment response.
Patients' revisions of their beliefs about the need for hospitalizationGardner, William; Lidz, Charles W.; Hoge, Steven K.; Monahan, John; Eisenberg, Marlene M.; Bennett, Nancy S.; Mulvey, Edward P.; Roth, Loren H. (1999-09-01)OBJECTIVE: An influential rationale for involuntary hospitalization is that prospective patients who refuse hospitalization at the time it is offered are likely to change their belief about the necessity of hospitalization after receiving hospital treatment. The authors examine how patients changed their evaluations of psychiatric hospitalization following hospital treatment. METHOD: The authors studied 433 patients who were interviewed about their hospitalization within 2 days of their admission to a psychiatric hospital; 267 of these patients were reinterviewed 4-8 weeks following discharge. RESULTS: When reinterviewed at follow-up, 33 (52%) of 64 patients who said at admission that they did not need hospitalization said that, in retrospect, they believed they had needed it. Only 9 (5%) of 198 patients who said at admission that they needed hospitalization shifted to saying that they had not needed it. CONCLUSIONS: Many of the patients who initially judged that they did not need hospitalization revised their belief after hospital discharge and reported that they had needed hospital treatment. However, perceptions of coercion were stable from admission to follow-up, and patients' attitudes toward hospitalization did not become more positive. Coerced patients did not appear to be grateful for the experience of hospitalization, even if they later concluded that they had needed it.
The rights of state hospital patients: from state hospitals to their alternativesGeller, Jeffrey L.; Fisher, William H.; McDermeit, Melissa; White, Carla L. (1999-12-03)During the 1980s and 1990s the locus of psychiatric treatment in many states shifted from state hospitals to the psychiatric units of general hospitals. The extent to which the rights guaranteed to psychiatric inpatients by state mental health agencies will survive this "privatization" process is unclear. The authors explore this issue by providing a "status report" of patient rights, identified through a national survey. They discuss the problems of preserving these rights as an ever greater proportion of care is provided in general hospitals under the mechanism of managed care.