Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGuy, Laura S.
dc.contributor.authorDouglas, Kevin S.
dc.date2022-08-11T08:10:23.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T17:06:58Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T17:06:58Z
dc.date.issued2006-06-14
dc.date.submitted2011-01-06
dc.identifier.citationPsychol Assess. 2006 Jun;18(2):225-30. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.18.2.225">Link to article on publisher's site</a>
dc.identifier.issn1040-3590 (Linking)
dc.identifier.doi10.1037/1040-3590.18.2.225
dc.identifier.pmid16768600
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/45224
dc.description.abstractThe correspondence between the Hare Psychopathy Checklist: Screening Version (PCL:SV; S. D. Hart, D. N. Cox, and R. D. Hare, 1995) and the Hare Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R; R. D. Hare, 1991, 2003) was examined in forensic (N = 175) and correctional (N = 188) samples. Intermeasure correlations for Total scores (.95 forensic, .94 correctional) and the original 2-factor, D. J. Cooke and C. Michie's (2001) 3-factor, and R. D. Hare's (2003) 4-facet models (range = .87-.95) were high. Area under the curve values for the PCL:SV were .98 in both samples (cutoff = PCL-R Total score of 25). The PCL:SV performed well as a screen, maximizing false positive relative to false negative errors. Close correlations for prediction of violent recidivism in the correctional sample were obtained for the PCL-R (.42) and PCL:SV (.37). Results indicate the robust relation between the measures is maintained whether they are completed on the basis of file review only or file plus interview and whether the same or different raters score the measures.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=16768600&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a>
dc.relation.urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.18.2.225
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectAntisocial Personality Disorder
dc.subjectFactor Analysis, Statistical
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectMass Screening
dc.subjectPrisoners
dc.subject*Questionnaires
dc.subjectHealth Services Research
dc.subjectMental and Social Health
dc.subjectPsychiatric and Mental Health
dc.subjectPsychiatry
dc.subjectPsychiatry and Psychology
dc.titleExamining the utility of the PCL:SV as a screening measure using competing factor models of psychopathy
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitlePsychological assessment
dc.source.volume18
dc.source.issue2
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/psych_cmhsr/323
dc.identifier.contextkey1719528
html.description.abstract<p>The correspondence between the Hare Psychopathy Checklist: Screening Version (PCL:SV; S. D. Hart, D. N. Cox, and R. D. Hare, 1995) and the Hare Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R; R. D. Hare, 1991, 2003) was examined in forensic (N = 175) and correctional (N = 188) samples. Intermeasure correlations for Total scores (.95 forensic, .94 correctional) and the original 2-factor, D. J. Cooke and C. Michie's (2001) 3-factor, and R. D. Hare's (2003) 4-facet models (range = .87-.95) were high. Area under the curve values for the PCL:SV were .98 in both samples (cutoff = PCL-R Total score of 25). The PCL:SV performed well as a screen, maximizing false positive relative to false negative errors. Close correlations for prediction of violent recidivism in the correctional sample were obtained for the PCL-R (.42) and PCL:SV (.37). Results indicate the robust relation between the measures is maintained whether they are completed on the basis of file review only or file plus interview and whether the same or different raters score the measures.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathpsych_cmhsr/323
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Psychiatry
dc.source.pages225-30


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record