A Comparison of Factor Models on the PCL-R With Mentally Disordered Offenders: The Development of a Four-Factor Model
| dc.contributor.author | Vitacco, Michael J. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Rogers, Richard | |
| dc.contributor.author | Neumann, Craig S. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Harrison, Kimberly S. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Vincent, Gina M. | |
| dc.date | 2022-08-11T08:10:23.000 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-08-23T17:07:08Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2022-08-23T17:07:08Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2005-10-01 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2011-01-31 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Michael J. Vitacco, Richard Rogers, Craig S. Neumann, Kimberly S. Harrison, and Gina Vincent. A Comparison of Factor Models on the PCL-R With Mentally Disordered Offenders: The Development of a Four-Factor Model. Criminal Justice and Behavior October 2005 32: 526-545, doi:10.1177/0093854805278414. | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1177/0093854805278414 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/45266 | |
| dc.description.abstract | For more than a decade, researchers and practitioners have generally accepted a two-factor model for the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R) composed of core personality features and an antisocial lifestyle. Very recently, Cooke and Michie (2001) proposed a three-factor solution that divided the core personality features into two dimensions while eliminating antisocial behavior. This study of male, mentally disordered offenders (N = 96) directly compared factor models via confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). When using testlets to combine theoretically similar items into single ratings, the nested three-factor model was an excellent fit. Of importance, the development of a four-factor model with the inclusion of antisocial items also produced an excellent fit. Combined with recent research, these findings have important ramifications for the construct validity of the PCL-R. | |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | |
| dc.relation.url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0093854805278414 | |
| dc.subject | Antisocial Personality Disorder | |
| dc.subject | Psychiatric Status Rating Scales | |
| dc.subject | Violence | |
| dc.subject | Health Services Research | |
| dc.subject | Mental and Social Health | |
| dc.subject | Psychiatric and Mental Health | |
| dc.subject | Psychiatry | |
| dc.subject | Psychiatry and Psychology | |
| dc.title | A Comparison of Factor Models on the PCL-R With Mentally Disordered Offenders: The Development of a Four-Factor Model | |
| dc.type | Journal Article | |
| dc.source.journaltitle | Criminal Justice and Behavior | |
| dc.source.volume | 32 | |
| dc.source.issue | 5 | |
| dc.identifier.legacycoverpage | https://escholarship.umassmed.edu/psych_cmhsr/366 | |
| dc.identifier.contextkey | 1753427 | |
| html.description.abstract | <p>For more than a decade, researchers and practitioners have generally accepted a two-factor model for the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R) composed of core personality features and an antisocial lifestyle. Very recently, Cooke and Michie (2001) proposed a three-factor solution that divided the core personality features into two dimensions while eliminating antisocial behavior. This study of male, mentally disordered offenders (N = 96) directly compared factor models via confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). When using testlets to combine theoretically similar items into single ratings, the nested three-factor model was an excellent fit. Of importance, the development of a four-factor model with the inclusion of antisocial items also produced an excellent fit. Combined with recent research, these findings have important ramifications for the construct validity of the PCL-R.</p> | |
| dc.identifier.submissionpath | psych_cmhsr/366 | |
| dc.contributor.department | Department of Psychiatry | |
| dc.source.pages | 526-545 |