Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRosenbaum, Alan
dc.contributor.authorWarnken, William J.
dc.contributor.authorGrudzinskas, Albert J. Jr.
dc.date2022-08-11T08:10:24.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T17:07:32Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T17:07:32Z
dc.date.issued2003-06-01
dc.date.submitted2012-01-04
dc.identifier.citationRosenbaum A, Warnken WJ, Grudzinskas AJ. (2003) Legal and Ethical Issues in the Court-Mandated Treatment of Batterers. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment and Trauma, 7 (1/2):279-303. DOI: 10.1300/J146v07n01_12
dc.identifier.doi10.1300/J146v07n01_12
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/45365
dc.description<p>Also published as a book chapter in: Dutton, D.G. and Sonkin, D.J. (2003) Intimate Violence: Contemporary Treatment Innovations. New York: Haworth Trauma and Maltreatment Press.</p>
dc.description.abstractIn the following article, we will explore the nature of the therapeutic relationship as it relates to batterers' treatment programs. We will consider the impact of obligations created by forces outside the relationship, such as those imposed by legal proceedings. We will discuss the concepts of confidentiality, privilege, and agency and their impact on the therapeutic relationship and the extent to which the therapists' understanding of the role these concepts play may be altered by court orders that impose treatment on a client/patient. Finally, we examine the issues and choices a therapist must make when engaging in court-ordered treatment of batterers, and the implications of those choices for both therapist and client; we will also suggest guidelines to help therapists sort through the often conflicting goals of therapy and the legal process.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation.urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J146v07n01_12
dc.subjectSpouse Abuse
dc.subjectDomestic Violence
dc.subjectLaw Enforcement
dc.subjectHealth Services Research
dc.subjectLaw
dc.subjectMental and Social Health
dc.subjectPsychiatric and Mental Health
dc.subjectPsychiatry
dc.subjectPsychiatry and Psychology
dc.titleLegal and Ethical Issues in the Court-Mandated Treatment of Batterers
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleJournal of Aggression, Maltreatment and Trauma
dc.source.volume7
dc.source.issue1/2
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/psych_cmhsr/484
dc.identifier.contextkey2429844
html.description.abstract<p>In the following article, we will explore the nature of the therapeutic relationship as it relates to batterers' treatment programs. We will consider the impact of obligations created by forces outside the relationship, such as those imposed by legal proceedings. We will discuss the concepts of confidentiality, privilege, and agency and their impact on the therapeutic relationship and the extent to which the therapists' understanding of the role these concepts play may be altered by court orders that impose treatment on a client/patient. Finally, we examine the issues and choices a therapist must make when engaging in court-ordered treatment of batterers, and the implications of those choices for both therapist and client; we will also suggest guidelines to help therapists sort through the often conflicting goals of therapy and the legal process.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathpsych_cmhsr/484
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Psychiatry
dc.source.pages279-303


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record