Public policy and limits of diversion programs for reducing jail exposure of persons with serious mental illness
| dc.contributor.author | Fisher, William H. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Grudzinskas, Albert J. Jr. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Roy-Bujnowski, Kristen M. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Wolff, Nancy | |
| dc.date | 2022-08-11T08:10:24.000 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-08-23T17:07:38Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2022-08-23T17:07:38Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2011-12-01 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2012-05-16 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | <p>Psychiatr Serv. 2011 Dec;62(12):1503-5. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.004532010" target="_blank">Link to article on publisher's site</a></p> | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1075-2730 (Linking) | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1176/appi.ps.004532010 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/45388 | |
| dc.description.abstract | OBJECTIVE: Diverting potential arrestees with serious mental illnesses from the criminal justice system to mental health services has become a mainstay of public policy. Federal funding for local diversion and mental health court programs mandates that recipients of funds focus on "nonviolent misdemeanants," allowing more serious offenders to proceed through the justice system. This study explored the potential effects of applying such exclusions to a group of arrestees with serious psychiatric illnesses. METHODS: Data on charges in a cohort of mental health service recipients (N=13,816) were analyzed. RESULTS: Episodes of felony arrest, including some involving violence toward others, outnumbered misdemeanors. Under federal funding policies, many such cases would be processed through the justice system. CONCLUSIONS: Expanding inclusion criteria is necessary if diversion is to significantly affect incarceration rates among persons with mental illnesses. Policy makers should heed the accumulating evidence in this area in determining priorities for funding. | |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | |
| dc.relation | <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=22193799&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a> | |
| dc.relation.url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.004532010 | |
| dc.subject | Community Mental Health Services | |
| dc.subject | Criminal Law | |
| dc.subject | Mental Disorders | |
| dc.subject | Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care) | |
| dc.subject | Public Policy | |
| dc.subject | Health Services Research | |
| dc.subject | Mental and Social Health | |
| dc.subject | Psychiatric and Mental Health | |
| dc.subject | Psychiatry | |
| dc.subject | Psychiatry and Psychology | |
| dc.title | Public policy and limits of diversion programs for reducing jail exposure of persons with serious mental illness | |
| dc.type | Journal Article | |
| dc.source.journaltitle | Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.) | |
| dc.source.volume | 62 | |
| dc.source.issue | 12 | |
| dc.identifier.legacycoverpage | https://escholarship.umassmed.edu/psych_cmhsr/506 | |
| dc.identifier.contextkey | 2852780 | |
| html.description.abstract | <p>OBJECTIVE: Diverting potential arrestees with serious mental illnesses from the criminal justice system to mental health services has become a mainstay of public policy. Federal funding for local diversion and mental health court programs mandates that recipients of funds focus on "nonviolent misdemeanants," allowing more serious offenders to proceed through the justice system. This study explored the potential effects of applying such exclusions to a group of arrestees with serious psychiatric illnesses.</p> <p>METHODS: Data on charges in a cohort of mental health service recipients (N=13,816) were analyzed.</p> <p>RESULTS: Episodes of felony arrest, including some involving violence toward others, outnumbered misdemeanors. Under federal funding policies, many such cases would be processed through the justice system.</p> <p>CONCLUSIONS: Expanding inclusion criteria is necessary if diversion is to significantly affect incarceration rates among persons with mental illnesses. Policy makers should heed the accumulating evidence in this area in determining priorities for funding.</p> | |
| dc.identifier.submissionpath | psych_cmhsr/506 | |
| dc.contributor.department | Department of Psychiatry | |
| dc.source.pages | 1503-5 |
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
A Public Health Framework for the State Mental Health Authority: A Call for Action by Massachusetts Consumers and Family MembersDuring the Spring of 2006, Consumer Quality Initiatives (CQI) conducted 20 focus groups across the state, 12 with adults with mental illness, 3 with parents of youth with serious emotional disorder, 2 with youth with SED, 1 with family members of adult consumers, and 2 with youth in transition. Supported by a contract with Massachusetts Department of Mental Health (DMH), the goal was to assist DMH in framing the criteria for its upcoming reprocurement. Our findings reveal a frustration with an approach to health care delivery that focuses primarily on the provision of psychiatric care (egs, medication, therapy, hospitalization). We reviewed the focus group reports to identify the most significant themes, which clustered within eight broad categories.
-
Promoting the Health of Parents & Children: Addressing Perinatal Mental Health by Building Medical Provider Capacity Through Perinatal Psychiatry Access ProgramsMental health conditions are the most common obstetric complications of the perinatal period, impacting 1 in 5 individuals during pregnancy and the year following pregnancy. Perinatal mental health (PMH) conditions have deleterious effects on the health of perinatal individuals and their children, and are a leading and preventable cause of maternal mortality. Nevertheless, PMH conditions are underrecognized, underdiagnosed, and undertreated. To address these gaps, Massachusetts created the Massachusetts Child Psychiatry Access Program (MCPAP) for Moms to build the capacity of frontline medical providers to address PMH conditions by providing education, consultation, and resources and referrals. MCPAP for Moms has emerged as a successful and scalable model with at least 25 states or organizations implementing or developing similar Perinatal Psychiatry Access Programs. This report summarizes the Perinatal Psychiatry Access Program model and its individual and national impact.
-
Linking Kids with Trauma to Evidence-Based Treatment: Implementation of a Centralized Referral System at the Child Trauma Training Center at the University of Massachusetts Medical SchoolAt a time when the general standard of child welfare and mental health provision has been improving, some important groups in Massachusetts remain under-served. One such is children suffering from trauma. Despite various state-wide efforts to educate professionals about the evidence-based treatments available, trauma sufferers have typically faced long waits to receive these treatments, with average waiting times at some larger mental health agencies stretching to four or even six months. In this brief, we are presenting the implementation of a highly innovative Centralized Referral System – LINK-KID – developed at the Child Trauma Training Center (CTTC) at the University of Massachusetts Medical School. LINK-KID referral system connects children in need of evidence-based trauma treatment with mental health providers who have been trained in these treatments.
